|
|
Post by Hollywood Asia on Jan 17, 2009 21:30:45 GMT -5
Punk shouldn't be anywhere near headline WM matches Asia didn't you used to like Punk? Regardless, he's done nothing to deserve being in that position, he jobbed out most of 2008. Had a forgetable World Title Reign and is now in mid card obscurity. No way does he deserve or should be in a high profile match. Im being realistic but all the fanboys are drunk on Pepsi i guess to understand that. |
|
|
|
Post by ppk101 on Jan 17, 2009 21:35:35 GMT -5
Asia didn't you used to like Punk? Regardless, he's done nothing to deserve being in that position, he jobbed out most of 2008. Had a forgetable World Title Reign and is now in mid card obscurity. No way does he deserve or should be in a high profile match. Im being realistic but all the fanboys are drunk on Pepsi i guess to understand that. I get what you're saying, but Punk did have I think it was the second most wins in 2008, he didn't job out most of the year. He held 3 different titles, won Money in the Bank, and I don't think his World Title run was bad until the night he lost the title and the way they handled him afterwards. I agreed with people who say he shouldn't face Austin but I think he could face HBK... there's no reason why he couldn't. |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Jan 17, 2009 21:52:54 GMT -5
I would rather see Morrison/Michaels than Punk/Michaels tbh. S
|
|
|
|
Post by pineappleexpress on Jan 17, 2009 21:57:17 GMT -5
Yeah, Morrison/Michaels would rock the crap.
Have Morrison mirror Michaels' early days leading into WrestleMania, even employing a bodyguard, a la Diesel.
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Jan 17, 2009 22:00:31 GMT -5
Yeah, Morrison/Michaels would rock the ****. Have Morrison mirror Michaels' early days leading into WrestleMania, even employing a bodyguard, a la Diesel. Yeah, that would be better then "Wrestlemania 24: Part Two" for me and would be a buy for me. |
|
|
|
Post by Controversial Maverick PUNK on Jan 17, 2009 22:34:47 GMT -5
To hell with Morrison - if Punk's not worthy of wrestling HBK at WM - as some in here have said, then Morrison definitely isn't..
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 3, 2024 8:46:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2009 22:38:02 GMT -5
It should be Morrison. Why would CM Punk be randomly inserted into the rivalry with HBK? He clearly failed as a main-eventer that's why he's in the i.c. level now.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 3, 2024 8:46:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2009 22:43:20 GMT -5
The only current wrestlers that are remotely near Michaels level are Undertaker, Shelton Benjamin, Kurt Angle, and Sting. But storyline wise, it would make sense to have a young up & comer like Morrison battle HBK.
|
|
|
|
Post by Controversial Maverick PUNK on Jan 17, 2009 22:56:21 GMT -5
It should be Morrison. Why would CM Punk be randomly inserted into the rivalry with HBK? He clearly failed as a main-eventer that's why he's in the i.c. level now. He didn't fail at anything... the clueless and mostly useless, creative team were the ones who failed - not Punk.. but I digress.. If you actually bothered to read what I wrote, you'd see that there is no rivalry, no feud between Michaels and Punk.. This is based solely on the hypothetical premise, that Michaels himself, picks Punk as the person he wants to face in his last ever match, so he can pass the torch to the future of the company.. It's not that complicated to understand.. Anyway, I'm done with this now - I'm getting tired of repeating myself.. |
|
|
|
Post by fallenheart on Jan 18, 2009 0:35:00 GMT -5
That would be great, HBK vs Cm Punk that would be great, I would love to see that at Mania . I will i can get tickets for Mania...
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Jan 18, 2009 1:34:42 GMT -5
To hell with Morrison - if Punk's not worthy of wrestling HBK at WM - as some in here have said, then Morrison definitely isn't.. I'm not the one who said Punk wasn't worthy of facing Michaels at 'Mania. I'm saying it would be a better story than with Punk. |
|
|
|
Post by AdamBomb on Jan 18, 2009 1:56:17 GMT -5
This whole Morrison thing is ridiculous. Punk has been the  ing World Heavyweight Champion for God sake, that one fact alone puts them on different plateaus entirely. If we're talking about a WrestleMania main event spot and it's between CM Punk and John Morrison, Punk is obviously getting the spot regardless of what anyone of us thinks. All that matters is what WWE thinks, and they obviously favor CM Punk more.... and rightfully so in my opinion. |
|
|
|
Post by TeamExtreme718x on Jan 18, 2009 2:53:11 GMT -5
You guys are all bitching about this match..But you know that you would all have interest in it if it were to happen..
|
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Jan 18, 2009 3:19:11 GMT -5
I don't think Punk is good enought to beat or even face HBK in his last match.
It would be better than jbl/hbk though, that's for sure.
|
|
|
|
Post by Calcifer Boheme on Jan 18, 2009 12:09:02 GMT -5
It shouldn't happen at 25, there's no build up... Plus the angle makes far more sense for HBK/JBL to have it's blow off at Mania.
But maybe a couple of years down the road, it'd be cool.
|
|
|
|
Post by thepeopleschamp on Jan 18, 2009 12:29:12 GMT -5
Holy Crap. Just yesterday everyone hated CM Punk and said he was a bad wrestler. Now we want him to face HBK. Strange strange board. But this would be a fantastic match. ha ha are you forgetting this is WF where large quantities of people turn more than Kane turns heel & face |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 18, 2009 13:28:08 GMT -5
You guys are all bitching about this match..But you know that you would all have interest in it if it were to happen.. In the match, yes. The way that this guy has it planned out, no. It's funny, if you criticize the idea, he attacks you. |
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Jan 18, 2009 14:47:29 GMT -5
i'd like to see that at next year's mania...i think cm punk has to be redeemed a bit more over the next year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Controversial Maverick PUNK on Jan 18, 2009 14:49:37 GMT -5
You guys are all bitching about this match..But you know that you would all have interest in it if it were to happen.. In the match, yes. The way that this guy has it planned out, no. It's funny, if you criticize the idea, he attacks you. Where?.. Show me one instance where I've "attacked" anybody in this thread.. All I've done is tried to explain myself over, and over and over again - because some people, apparently are not able to grasp the simple concept of the idea.. To hell with Morrison - if Punk's not worthy of wrestling HBK at WM - as some in here have said, then Morrison definitely isn't.. I'm not the one who said Punk wasn't worthy of facing Michaels at 'Mania. I'm saying it would be a better story than with Punk. I never said you were.. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 18, 2009 15:28:13 GMT -5
"Do I need post the definition of the word "hypothetical"?"
Acting like I'm stupid.
|
|
