|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Jan 27, 2009 6:03:06 GMT -5
The ecw belt is quite good. The writing is a very solid effort, its not amazing but i know from experience that is damn hard so congrats on a fantastic effort. The purple could be a tad lighter to distinguish it from the black too.
However, that belt shouldnt have the black on the main plate (in all the crevases). The old pre-wwe ecw belt featured the purple instead of red and the main plate only had black where it said world and champion.
If you were going for the WWE-ECW look then the purple needs to be red on the logo, the side plates need black in the crevases, and the ecw side plates need black outer with red letters.
So yeah not sure which one you were after but those are the specs. Nice work.
|
|
|
Post by inrogers29 on Jan 27, 2009 6:11:14 GMT -5
my favorite is the ecw belt
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 18:30:02 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2009 13:42:50 GMT -5
The ecw belt is quite good. The writing is a very solid effort, its not amazing but i know from experience that is damn hard so congrats on a fantastic effort. The purple could be a tad lighter to distinguish it from the black too. However, that belt shouldnt have the black on the main plate (in all the crevases). The old pre-wwe ecw belt featured the purple instead of red and the main plate only had black where it said world and champion. That would be true if he was doing the Awesome, Tanaka, Credible on version of the ECW title. The Shane Douglas version had red ECW logo on the main plate, the triangles behind the barbedwire bats were painted black, and the belt had yellow backing with "The Franchise" airbrushed on the backing. The Taz version had a black ECW logo and globe on the main plate, the blood was orange (not red), the triangles behind the barbedwire bats were painted black, and it had orange backing. Both the Franchise and Taz version had blue globes on the side plates with "Hardcore Wrestling" in red. The Franchise version of the outer side plates were red ECW logo, and blue paint outside it. The Taz version however was red ECW logo with black paint outside it.
|
|
TheXtremisT
Main Eventer
10 Year Member
This is the way
Joined on: May 3, 2008 8:03:15 GMT -5
Posts: 3,931
|
Post by TheXtremisT on Jan 27, 2009 13:45:34 GMT -5
okay dude I don't remeber him posting about his fig or why cena has elbow pads its about his belt that he made which I think is brilliant but since your jelious you can't make a better one you act like is horrible. last time I checked I don't remember you posting a belt that's better. and btw his figure came with elbow pads. so please quit being a jerk. actually i do believe my ECW belt was better but you can search for that since i posted it a few months back. I wasn't trying to be a jerk i was trying to help him out and show him what the belt is suppose to look like but he was just a prick about us giving him pointers. to the OP your ECW belt is nice. the ONLY thing i can bitch about is i think the purple is a tad to dark but thats just being picky. the leather is a tad large but we're not gonna get into this again. well you certainly came off as a jerk, and i was a prick? get real mate there's no need to insult me, just because we have a difference of opinion doesn't mean i was a prick, and don't insult someone when they haven't insulted or offended you and you were giving me pointers? no actually you were criticising it and basically saying there was nothing good about it - yeah right this post was not about cena wearing elbow pads, plus i explained why it was a bit too large, and guess what? it doesn't even make the belt look bad
|
|
TheXtremisT
Main Eventer
10 Year Member
This is the way
Joined on: May 3, 2008 8:03:15 GMT -5
Posts: 3,931
|
Post by TheXtremisT on Jan 27, 2009 13:48:05 GMT -5
The ecw belt is quite good. The writing is a very solid effort, its not amazing but i know from experience that is damn hard so congrats on a fantastic effort. The purple could be a tad lighter to distinguish it from the black too. However, that belt shouldnt have the black on the main plate (in all the crevases). The old pre-wwe ecw belt featured the purple instead of red and the main plate only had black where it said world and champion. If you were going for the WWE-ECW look then the purple needs to be red on the logo, the side plates need black in the crevases, and the ecw side plates need black outer with red letters. So yeah not sure which one you were after but those are the specs. Nice work. well to be honest, i used a ref pick from wwe magazine, and i know they showed the old ecw belt as it had no black in the crevases, so i put the black on i ddnt realise the ecw logo had red, but i dont mind i still think it looks good
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 18:30:02 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2009 21:23:12 GMT -5
The ecw belt is quite good. The writing is a very solid effort, its not amazing but i know from experience that is damn hard so congrats on a fantastic effort. The purple could be a tad lighter to distinguish it from the black too. However, that belt shouldnt have the black on the main plate (in all the crevases). The old pre-wwe ecw belt featured the purple instead of red and the main plate only had black where it said world and champion. If you were going for the WWE-ECW look then the purple needs to be red on the logo, the side plates need black in the crevases, and the ecw side plates need black outer with red letters. So yeah not sure which one you were after but those are the specs. Nice work. well to be honest, i used a ref pick from wwe magazine, and i know they showed the old ecw belt as it had no black in the crevases, so i put the black on i ddnt realise the ecw logo had red, but i dont mind i still think it looks good Thanks for answering my question /sarcasm. I guess because you think I'm new around here you'll just skip over a good question. Incase you missed it, the question was, why do you stitch your belts? No real belts made after 1983 had stitching (besides the original BG, which hasn't been used since early 2000), but they did have tooling, and leather lacing (the DG). So why do you do that again?
|
|
TheXtremisT
Main Eventer
10 Year Member
This is the way
Joined on: May 3, 2008 8:03:15 GMT -5
Posts: 3,931
|
Post by TheXtremisT on Jan 28, 2009 13:16:13 GMT -5
well to be honest, i used a ref pick from wwe magazine, and i know they showed the old ecw belt as it had no black in the crevases, so i put the black on i ddnt realise the ecw logo had red, but i dont mind i still think it looks good Thanks for answering my question /sarcasm. I guess because you think I'm new around here you'll just skip over a good question. Incase you missed it, the question was, why do you stitch your belts? No real belts made after 1983 had stitching (besides the original BG, which hasn't been used since early 2000), but they did have tooling, and leather lacing (the DG). So why do you do that again? ok mate calm down, i didn't see that, i apologise well the 1/500 belts have stitching, and i have seen recent belts with stitching, i saw it on close up pics so they do have it
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 18:30:02 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2009 19:48:36 GMT -5
Thanks for answering my question /sarcasm. I guess because you think I'm new around here you'll just skip over a good question. Incase you missed it, the question was, why do you stitch your belts? No real belts made after 1983 had stitching (besides the original BG, which hasn't been used since early 2000), but they did have tooling, and leather lacing (the DG). So why do you do that again? ok mate calm down, i didn't see that, i apologise well the 1/500 belts have stitching, and i have seen recent belts with stitching, i saw it on close up pics so they do have it I'm calm, sorry if I came off a bit harsh. The only belts that use stitching are Fig Inc. replica belts, pre 80's belts(besides the original BG), and the new ECW belt that was made by a movie prop company. Real belts made by Reggie Parks, Dave Millican, Joe Marshall, etc do not use stitching on their belts. They have tooling, which is a stamp (with whatever design they choose) that is hammered into the leather to make a outer boarder. I didn't know if you were trying to simulate tooling by adding the stitching or were just following pics of Fig Inc. belts. That's why I asked.
|
|
TheXtremisT
Main Eventer
10 Year Member
This is the way
Joined on: May 3, 2008 8:03:15 GMT -5
Posts: 3,931
|
Post by TheXtremisT on Jan 30, 2009 12:19:53 GMT -5
ok mate calm down, i didn't see that, i apologise well the 1/500 belts have stitching, and i have seen recent belts with stitching, i saw it on close up pics so they do have it I'm calm, sorry if I came off a bit harsh. The only belts that use stitching are Fig Inc. replica belts, pre 80's belts(besides the original BG), and the new ECW belt that was made by a movie prop company. Real belts made by Reggie Parks, Dave Millican, Joe Marshall, etc do not use stitching on their belts. They have tooling, which is a stamp (with whatever design they choose) that is hammered into the leather to make a outer boarder. I didn't know if you were trying to simulate tooling by adding the stitching or were just following pics of Fig Inc. belts. That's why I asked. Tooling??? lol well i'm sure i saw stitching on the WHC in real life, and i am 90% sure i saw it on 1/500 belts but i think they also look better with it on
|
|
|
Post by dmallett4 on Jan 30, 2009 13:22:01 GMT -5
While i think the belts are good, you should really change your attitude. Not once has your belt been 'picked on', as people are only pointing out flaws that make the belt innacurate, and therefore trying to help you improve in the future. Yet you dont seem to appreciate this, and just post 'well i like it that way', as your only defense.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 18:30:02 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2009 15:40:04 GMT -5
I'm calm, sorry if I came off a bit harsh. The only belts that use stitching are Fig Inc. replica belts, pre 80's belts(besides the original BG), and the new ECW belt that was made by a movie prop company. Real belts made by Reggie Parks, Dave Millican, Joe Marshall, etc do not use stitching on their belts. They have tooling, which is a stamp (with whatever design they choose) that is hammered into the leather to make a outer boarder. I didn't know if you were trying to simulate tooling by adding the stitching or were just following pics of Fig Inc. belts. That's why I asked. Tooling??? lol well i'm sure i saw stitching on the WHC in real life, and i am 90% sure i saw it on 1/500 belts but i think they also look better with it on Yes tooling, you stupid ignorant b!tch. This is tooling: This is the tooling on one of the many real belts I own WOW, look at that! No stitching to be seen ANYWHERE. Like I said before it's a boarder design stamp that is hammered into the leather. So why don't you do some research before you come in here and try to act like you know more about belts than me. EDIT: These are tooling stamps, This is what it does to the leather:
|
|
TheXtremisT
Main Eventer
10 Year Member
This is the way
Joined on: May 3, 2008 8:03:15 GMT -5
Posts: 3,931
|
Post by TheXtremisT on Jan 31, 2009 10:48:23 GMT -5
Tooling??? lol well i'm sure i saw stitching on the WHC in real life, and i am 90% sure i saw it on 1/500 belts but i think they also look better with it on Yes tooling, you stupid ignorant b!tch. This is tooling: This is the tooling on one of the many real belts I own WOW, look at that! No stitching to be seen ANYWHERE. Like I said before it's a boarder design stamp that is hammered into the leather. So why don't you do some research before you come in here and try to act like you know more about belts than me. EDIT: These are tooling stamps, This is what it does to the leather: WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU MAN? when did i ever come across as saying i knew more than you??? i was merely saying that i thought i saw stitching on the real WHC, not that i knew more about it than you - which is clearly not true as evident by your last post which gave me quite a bit of info to be completely honest it does look like stitching, so someone like me who has no knowledge of tooling thought it was stitching plus, this was the closest i could get to 'tooling' Now, why the hell do you keep thinking i'm coming across as someone who is annoying you? i have done nothing to seem offensive, or smart-arsed yet you seem to have tken offense for no reason i suggest you change your tone, and don't offend anyone else on this board or you will get told by the admins to stop insulting people now take a minute to re-read what i wrote earlier, and try to see it from my perspective (someone who doesn't know about these things on belts) i thank you for showing me my fault, but you don't have to take things the wrong way i would appreciate it if you could just forget this incident, and hope this doesn't happen again
|
|
TheXtremisT
Main Eventer
10 Year Member
This is the way
Joined on: May 3, 2008 8:03:15 GMT -5
Posts: 3,931
|
Post by TheXtremisT on Jan 31, 2009 10:51:57 GMT -5
While i think the belts are good, you should really change your attitude. Not once has your belt been 'picked on', as people are only pointing out flaws that make the belt innacurate, and therefore trying to help you improve in the future. Yet you dont seem to appreciate this, and just post 'well i like it that way', as your only defense. ok i see your point, i guess i thought they were really good for me, but others didn't i just thought they didn't see what was good about it
|
|
|
Post by Jaz on Jan 31, 2009 11:08:24 GMT -5
looks great again man, don't worry about all those stupid people that don't like it, as long as you like it it's great. 10/10
|
|