|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Aug 23, 2007 23:40:39 GMT -5
Were we supposed to forget that Traci was Kazarian's valet for all that time?
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Aug 23, 2007 23:41:33 GMT -5
Were we supposed to forget that Traci was Kazarian's valet for all that time? she was bentley's |
|
|
|
Post by wwemark1 on Aug 23, 2007 23:53:13 GMT -5
Were we supposed to forget that Traci was Kazarian's valet for all that time? You're thinking of Matt Bentley Kazarian's former tag team partner unless she managed him & I don't know it. |
|
|
|
Post by comebackkid on Aug 23, 2007 23:55:21 GMT -5
She managed them when they were a tag team im sure
|
|
|
|
Post by alessicustoms2 on Aug 24, 2007 0:15:26 GMT -5
Great Show - I thought the Steiner Angle match was good I was hoping Steiners for the win but meh
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Aug 24, 2007 1:01:14 GMT -5
Were we supposed to forget that Traci was Kazarian's valet for all that time? You're thinking of Matt Bentley Kazarian's former tag team partner unless she managed him & I don't know it. After the New Franchise Traci stayed as Bentely's valet, they teamed up with Kaz to form Shazarian, then they split and it was just traci and Matt...again..then dusty's secretary then roode...so yes, you're right, there is a bit of history there between the two  |
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Aug 24, 2007 3:05:39 GMT -5
So I am going to ask (since I didn't watch iMPACT)... was it any good? I mean if it is than I would try to catch the replay but is it worth the effort of finding out what time the replay comes on at here in Canada?
|
|
|
|
Post by wwemark1 on Aug 24, 2007 3:13:22 GMT -5
I enjoyed it.. take that for what it's worth.
|
|
|
|
Post by comebackkid on Aug 24, 2007 3:30:05 GMT -5
So I am going to ask (since I didn't watch iMPACT)... was it any good? I mean if it is than I would try to catch the replay but is it worth the effort of finding out what time the replay comes on at here in Canada? This isn't the WWE Raw thread where if you asked this some people would say no unbiasedly. Everyone is gonna "omfgz itt waz gud" regardless of what was on the show 99% of the time. www.wrestlingobserver.com has a great recap of this show from an unbias standpoint with many points TNA marks are blind too. |
|
|
|
Post by hmcustoms on Aug 24, 2007 13:00:30 GMT -5
The quote in your sig is broken, and it makes you look like more of an idiot than Asia  |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Aug 24, 2007 14:15:04 GMT -5
The quote in your sig is broken, and it makes you look like more of an idiot than Asia I'm not a fan of Asia either but no need to call him names in the thread. can ya stay on topic?  |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Aug 24, 2007 14:47:41 GMT -5
So I am going to ask (since I didn't watch iMPACT)... was it any good? I mean if it is than I would try to catch the replay but is it worth the effort of finding out what time the replay comes on at here in Canada? This isn't the WWE Raw thread where if you asked this some people would say no unbiasedly. LMAO |
|
|
|
Post by comebackkid on Aug 24, 2007 15:43:12 GMT -5
The quote in your sig is broken, and it makes you look like more of an idiot than Asia Thanks HIW, man of 1000 bans |
|
|
|
Post by THE *Legendary* STINGER on Aug 25, 2007 13:24:38 GMT -5
So I am going to ask (since I didn't watch iMPACT)... was it any good? I mean if it is than I would try to catch the replay but is it worth the effort of finding out what time the replay comes on at here in Canada? This isn't the WWE Raw thread where if you asked this some people would say no unbiasedly. Everyone is gonna "omfgz itt waz gud" regardless of what was on the show 99% of the time. www.wrestlingobserver.com has a great recap of this show from an unbias standpoint with many points TNA marks are blind too. dude why do you have to talk so much crapabout tna fans? You know that TNA was a good show, WAY more than what you expected. it was back at the pace that TNA had before this belt thing. |
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Aug 25, 2007 15:43:59 GMT -5
omg i hate 2 say it but i told u so LOOOL
Lol people these days
TNA dont come on here
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Aug 25, 2007 15:50:43 GMT -5
This isn't the WWE Raw thread where if you asked this some people would say no unbiasedly. Everyone is gonna "omfgz itt waz gud" regardless of what was on the show 99% of the time. www.wrestlingobserver.com has a great recap of this show from an unbias standpoint with many points TNA marks are blind too. dude why do you have to talk so much **** about tna fans? You know that TNA was a good show, WAY more than what you expected. it was back at the pace that TNA had before this belt thing. I watched the replay... and I dunno if you were watching the same show I was because that was truthfully... not that great... I still reserve that the only time TNA was good was either when they were on their Wednesday Pay Per View or the first year they had monthly PPV deals... so 03-04-ish |
|
|
|
Post by THE *Legendary* STINGER on Aug 25, 2007 15:58:23 GMT -5
dude why do you have to talk so much **** about tna fans? You know that TNA was a good show, WAY more than what you expected. it was back at the pace that TNA had before this belt thing. I watched the replay... and I dunno if you were watching the same show I was because that was truthfully... not that great... I still reserve that the only time TNA was good was either when they were on their Wednesday Pay Per View or the first year they had monthly PPV deals... so 03-04-ish you've got to be kidding me. The pacman thing is interesting because they are starting something new with EY EY vs Truth was good Roode vs Kaz was good Kurt vs Steiners was awesome what do you want from TNA? a PPV deal and AJ vs Amazing Red? from what they have TNA is doing ok. Lets just see what they do with Two hours. |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Aug 25, 2007 18:26:24 GMT -5
I have to question I guesss what constitutes good to people? Is it your favorite stars being showcased, the sotorytelling in the ring, the vignettes outside the ring?
Seems alot of people that bash the product are the ones that want to see styles vs daniels, Petey vs Lethal, Sabin, shelley, etc.
I'm all for those matches but like Roode said from what they have they are doing well...this week we got...some x guys like Kaz, young. Some nostalgia, with kurt/Steiners, hilarious and well done backstage stuff...and some new feuds with Kaz/roode. I think TNA has tried to givbe the fans a little of everything and I dont think alot of people look at that...they just want who they want now...that aint gonna happen when you only have one show. Does TNA need to cut some fat and expand their booking...sure, and hopefully they will.
the thing that makes bad programming for me is when unecessary and unconnective things happpen...I see that a bit more in WWE than TNA although TNA at times can be guilty of that.
then ya have some people that just bitch about everything becasue thats the thing to do..it's become habitchual ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by comebackkid on Aug 25, 2007 18:54:56 GMT -5
Things that make sense constitute as good.
I love how everything is "onfgz awsum" to these TNA marks, just as I said before.
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Aug 25, 2007 21:50:09 GMT -5
Things that make sense constitute as good. I love how everything is "onfgz awsum" to these TNA marks, just as I said before. If your actually able to engage in a meaningful debate I'd like to ask what exactly about the last 2 impact shows didnt make sense. I can really only think of two things; the Pacman title shot and the misinterpretation/misinformation of the announced lottery, both of which can be explainsed rationally, well maybe not Pacman . Point is it's one thing to bash "marks", but without a valid schematic of your cognitive processings, of the companies in which you critique, for us to understand, you essentially make yourself a "mark" as well...go ahead, take a minute...let it sink in. care to enlighten us? |
|
