|
|
Post by deskjet on Feb 8, 2009 8:13:40 GMT -5
Either this article is fake or Eric is talking total bull$ht! Sounds more like Sour grapes to me. I think TNA has vision, and is slowly getting better with some creativity. I get tired of hearing people say TNA is wwe lite. Every promotion inluding WWE has borrowed or done things similar to other promotions. There's really just no way aroun it unless you make it a non wrestling show to begin with, then wats the point. Anyway, Sounds like it was more like TNA didnt want Bischoff and Hogan comin in and makin it their little playground so thats why they're not in it. And putting people down becasue they cant get jobs in WWE or the former WCW isnt much of a put down considering the current state of WWE...i mean damn, how many times are we gonna see th McMahons vs someone saga played out. And given the fact that WCW was in the crapper for about 3 years after the nwo, isnt sayin much either. I think TNA is doing the best they can with the little roster and time that they have. Personally I have no prob with the MEM and really dont see it like the nwo. Nwo was hogan, hall, , Nash, and about 40 jackoff jobbers, all against 1 guy-Sting. This is group against group now. more like what you seen in the wwe attitude era like the Hart Foundation vs DX...you dont see that in WWE now, so even though it was done before, it makes it fresh. And Bischoff has no room to talk about creativity becasue Japan was doin an NWO style angle before he did it. that's where he got the idea(it's in his book). Bottom line, in the past year TNA has done more right things then wrong i believe, and that's a step towards the right direction imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Feb 8, 2009 15:40:22 GMT -5
A lot of rebuttals in these comments!
I think Bischoff is right on some things but who cares what he thinks?
He is not even involved with wrestling anymore unless celebrity wrestling counts..
|
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Feb 8, 2009 15:53:11 GMT -5
bischoff is a very smart man
|
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Feb 9, 2009 11:35:58 GMT -5
TNA should just respond with a photo of David Arquette holding the WCW title.
|
|
|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on Feb 9, 2009 11:56:02 GMT -5
Either this article is fake or Eric is talking total bull$ht! Sounds more like Sour grapes to me. I think TNA has vision, and is slowly getting better with some creativity. I get tired of hearing people say TNA is wwe lite. Every promotion inluding WWE has borrowed or done things similar to other promotions. There's really just no way aroun it unless you make it a non wrestling show to begin with, then wats the point. Anyway, Sounds like it was more like TNA didnt want Bischoff and Hogan comin in and makin it their little playground so thats why they're not in it. And putting people down becasue they cant get jobs in WWE or the former WCW isnt much of a put down considering the current state of WWE...i mean damn, how many times are we gonna see th McMahons vs someone saga played out. And given the fact that WCW was in the crapper for about 3 years after the nwo, isnt sayin much either. I think TNA is doing the best they can with the little roster and time that they have. Personally I have no prob with the MEM and really dont see it like the nwo. Nwo was hogan, hall, , Nash, and about 40 jackoff jobbers, all against 1 guy-Sting. This is group against group now. more like what you seen in the wwe attitude era like the Hart Foundation vs DX...you dont see that in WWE now, so even though it was done before, it makes it fresh. And Bischoff has no room to talk about creativity becasue Japan was doin an NWO style angle before he did it. that's where he got the idea(it's in his book). Bottom line, in the past year TNA has done more right things then wrong i believe, and that's a step towards the right direction imo. Seriously..you think TNA has vision...and that vision would be what..let Russo rehash more WCW/NWO storylines. That MEM takeover a few weeks back was BS and seriously I considered taking TNA off the DVR schedule. |
|
