|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Feb 17, 2009 23:41:06 GMT -5
Kong/Kim was terrible and not all that entertaining. Even if Stock is as good as you guys make her seem, it still isn't going to be worth it in the end. Thats the problem, their building up a division the average wrestling fan DOES NOT care about. I've seen 2 matches from Stock and while she's a great female wrestler, she isn't going to be worth the money for 1 or 2 fueds. - Triple S Terrible? That's laughable - but it's your opinion. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 17:51:56 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2009 23:43:23 GMT -5
Okay, maybe "terrible" wasn't the word to use, now that I look back on it. Still though, i've seen MUCH better female wrestling fueds than Kim/Kong.
Even the WWE has produced some better "diva" fueds over the past few years, than Kong/Kim.
- Triple S
|
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Asia on Feb 17, 2009 23:48:32 GMT -5
Kong/Kim was terrible and not all that entertaining. Even if Stock is as good as you guys make her seem, it still isn't going to be worth it in the end. Thats the problem, their building up a division the average wrestling fan DOES NOT care about. I've seen 2 matches from Stock and while she's a great female wrestler, she isn't going to be worth the money for 1 or 2 fueds. - Triple S disagree, Kong/Kim had some incredible matches with some being the best of the show and MOTYC. |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Feb 17, 2009 23:50:32 GMT -5
Kong/Kim was terrible and not all that entertaining. Even if Stock is as good as you guys make her seem, it still isn't going to be worth it in the end. Thats the problem, their building up a division the average wrestling fan DOES NOT care about. I've seen 2 matches from Stock and while she's a great female wrestler, she isn't going to be worth the money for 1 or 2 fueds. - Triple S disagree, Kong/Kim had some incredible matches with some being the best of the show and MOTYC. Exactly. Kong/Kim tore the house down everytime they had a match. |
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Feb 18, 2009 2:14:56 GMT -5
They sign a new knockout every other week!
Slow down a little!
I wish I had a pic of her..
|
|
Bozwell634™
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 27, 2007 0:11:21 GMT -5
Posts: 4,652
|
Post by Bozwell634™ on Feb 18, 2009 2:18:46 GMT -5
Sounds good too me, they are getting quite a womens division even if they only wrestle in battle royals all the time.
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Feb 18, 2009 2:26:43 GMT -5
They sign a new knockout every other week! Slow down a little! I wish I had a pic of her.. Her and Ashley Lane are the first ones since Sojo in December..  . Honestly, I don't see the problem signing more women really. They just need to drop Sojo, Saeed (the gimmick, not Melissa), Christy, and Rhaka Khan. |
|
|
|
Post by Controversial Maverick PUNK on Feb 18, 2009 3:50:00 GMT -5
Kong/Kim was terrible and not all that entertaining. Even if Stock is as good as you guys make her seem, it still isn't going to be worth it in the end. Thats the problem, their building up a division the average wrestling fan DOES NOT care about. I've seen 2 matches from Stock and while she's a great female wrestler, she isn't going to be worth the money for 1 or 2 fueds. - Triple S disagree, Kong/Kim had some incredible matches with some being the best of the show and MOTYC. LOL... Kim/Kong in a MOTY?.. Seriously?.. No match in that feud was a MOTYC - or anywhere close to it.. Best of the show, admittedly - but certainly not MOTY worthy... If that's your opinion, though, then you're pefectly entitled to think that.. |
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Asia on Feb 18, 2009 5:18:02 GMT -5
disagree, Kong/Kim had some incredible matches with some being the best of the show and MOTYC. LOL... Kim/Kong in a MOTY?.. Seriously?.. No match in that feud was a MOTYC - or anywhere close to it.. Best of the show, admittedly - but certainly not MOTY worthy... If that's your opinion, though, then you're pefectly entitled to think that.. They did have a MOTYC, i forgot which match it was, either one on PPV or the one which was the main event of IMPACT. This was a MOTYC for all the top wrestling journalist aswell as most of the internet community not just my idea of one and no it did not win MOTY. |
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Feb 18, 2009 6:53:51 GMT -5
Here are pics of her  DAMN!!! ^^^^^  |
|
r44gz96
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Joined on: Mar 8, 2009 10:42:07 GMT -5
Posts: 1,783
|
Post by r44gz96 on Feb 18, 2009 7:14:26 GMT -5
Here are pics of her DAMN!!! ^^^^^ Shame im not in my 20's   |
|
|
|
Post by Controversial Maverick PUNK on Feb 18, 2009 10:57:47 GMT -5
Here are pics of her DAMN!!! ^^^^^ Shame im not in my 20's The first pic, definitely... the second one - not so much ... |
|
|
|
Post by The Mac on Feb 18, 2009 11:26:58 GMT -5
Here is her in action
|
|
I LIKE BIG BUTTS
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
5-1
Joined on: May 14, 2008 16:35:10 GMT -5
Posts: 2,557
|
Post by I LIKE BIG BUTTS on Feb 18, 2009 14:17:47 GMT -5
Kong/Kim also had more heat than anything else on the shows it was on.
|
|
|
|
Post by abyss on Feb 18, 2009 14:34:18 GMT -5
Honestly, TNA is hiring way too many knockouts. I feel like they should focus more on using TBP. They have an interesting act and they seem to bring in ratings (for TNA standards). I can't believe that neither of them has held the belt yet. But overall, women's wrestling doesn't have a large market, and I don't get why they are trimming down on the roster, only to bring in more knockouts.
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Feb 18, 2009 15:19:05 GMT -5
Honestly, TNA is hiring way too many knockouts. I feel like they should focus more on using TBP. They have an interesting act and they seem to bring in ratings (for TNA standards). I can't believe that neither of them has held the belt yet. But overall, women's wrestling doesn't have a large market, and I don't get why they are trimming down on the roster, only to bring in more knockouts. Because, of the same reason you just mentioned - ratings. Honestly, I don't get the hype of TBP. Angelina is the - I guess - Shawn Michaels of the two while Velvet's the Marty Jannetty. I can see Angelina going far alone but Velvet - not so much. |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Feb 19, 2009 6:09:12 GMT -5
i was more impressed with the blonde chick
|
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Feb 19, 2009 15:19:12 GMT -5
Honestly, TNA is hiring way too many knockouts. I feel like they should focus more on using TBP. They have an interesting act and they seem to bring in ratings (for TNA standards). I can't believe that neither of them has held the belt yet. But overall, women's wrestling doesn't have a large market, and I don't get why they are trimming down on the roster, only to bring in more knockouts. Because, of the same reason you just mentioned - ratings. Honestly, I don't get the hype of TBP. Angelina is the - I guess - Shawn Michaels of the two while Velvet's the Marty Jannetty. I can see Angelina going far alone but Velvet - not so much. Womans wrestling can only get you so far until it flops over. |
|
