Dwight
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 10, 2007 11:02:46 GMT -5
Posts: 2,686
|
Post by Dwight on Feb 25, 2009 13:37:54 GMT -5
I still hate the blurring stuff and I simply don't watch shows from that era because it annoys the hell out of me after awhile.
I still hate the WWE name and always will.
|
|
|
|
Post by Batista on Feb 25, 2009 15:53:05 GMT -5
You shouldn't have to blur history. Sure, it might just be wrestling, but Vince changed the companies name, making him blur that logo is disgraceful. Its not like having it un-blurred would make the WWE any money by selling old dvds. Sure the logos there in the matches (turnbuckle and what not) but as long as the new WWE logo was on the bottom left corner of the screen it should be fine. Its so hard to sit threw old matches due to that blur crap.
|
|
Skittles McD
Superstar
Yo Bro!
Joined on: May 17, 2005 14:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 633
|
Post by Skittles McD on Feb 25, 2009 16:36:08 GMT -5
The worst part is the belt getting blurred.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Natural Eddy Valintino on Feb 25, 2009 16:43:31 GMT -5
Doesn't bother me. I just go to abingham to get old WWF videos.
|
|
|
|
Post by cawshbykid on Feb 25, 2009 18:02:16 GMT -5
They blur the scratch logo because it looks to similar to the one they still use and there is supposed to be no mentions of WWF anywhere, thats why they will cut the audio out when someone says WWF on the old re-released PPV's. They can say World Wrestling Federation all they want, its just the WWF usages that is illegal.
|
|
|
|
Post by Greg Weinstein on Feb 25, 2009 19:57:02 GMT -5
Yeah, the whole blurring thing on old vids is stupid.
|
|
|
|
Post by ztj_wwf on Feb 25, 2009 20:17:35 GMT -5
What I will never understand is why they didn't just go back to the WWWF initials instead in WWE and has anyone brought up the fact that the current logo makes no sense? The current logo has WW, so the company is World Wrestling? Why didn't they just add a line under the f so it would be the letter E on the side of the two W's instead of what it is now, which is nothing, just WW. That always confused me.
|
|
|
|
Post by AndyPeck13 on Feb 25, 2009 21:18:10 GMT -5
What I will never understand is why they didn't just go back to the WWWF initials instead in WWE and has anyone brought up the fact that the current logo makes no sense? The current logo has WW, so the company is World Wrestling? Why didn't they just add a line under the f so it would be the letter E on the side of the two W's instead of what it is now, which is nothing, just WW. That always confused me. i always thought the same thing...but i suppose it's too late to change it now |
|
ohiochad
Superstar
The Codebreaker!
Joined on: May 2, 2008 17:46:55 GMT -5
Posts: 732
|
Post by ohiochad on Feb 25, 2009 22:29:04 GMT -5
I still hate the blurring stuff and I simply don't watch shows from that era because it annoys the hell out of me after awhile.I still hate the WWE name and always will. This. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 25, 2024 16:23:02 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 25, 2009 23:16:38 GMT -5
Silver Vision allows the scratch logo to be seen without blurring on their 'Tagged Classics', and so on...
In regards to the name 'WWE', surely the sensible thing for McMahon to do (seeing as he forces the term 'sports-entertainment' down everyone's throats would be to rename the WWF to 'World Sports Entertainment', as there's bugger-all wrestling anyway...
|
|
