|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Mar 19, 2009 12:05:09 GMT -5
No, people are complaining because we don't care about womens wrestling. Just about nobody does. Yet, TNA decides to push it down our throats with terrible womens "6-Man" Tag matches. It's bad when theres 2 Knockout storylines going on. Both in which are extremely bad storylines. - Triple S You may not, but according to ratings which is what they are basing this off of, the public does and what the public wants, they get. Exactly - that's what I was talking about. |
|
|
|
Post by DontHassleTheHoff on Mar 19, 2009 12:10:40 GMT -5
Let's see.. Knockouts draw.. X-Division not so much.. Yeah, I think they should hire X-Division guys.  In my opinion the X-Division made TNA, that and WCW left overs... |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Mar 19, 2009 12:13:13 GMT -5
Let's see.. Knockouts draw.. X-Division not so much.. Yeah, I think they should hire X-Division guys. In my opinion the X-Division made TNA, that and WCW left overs... That has nothing to do with what I said. I'm talking about the here and now - the ratings prove the Knockout matches out rate the X-Division matches. |
|
|
|
Post by Heresy on Mar 19, 2009 14:16:41 GMT -5
In my opinion the X-Division made TNA, that and WCW left overs... That has nothing to do with what I said. I'm talking about the here and now - the ratings prove the Knockout matches out rate the X-Division matches. TNA shouldn't be running with that fact, but questioning it... knockouts aren't more talented, and they aren't better booked. Oh but they have tits and ass, which ultimately results in the difference in ratings. Is that difference worth catering to? Is a bunch of horny guys looking only to see a sexy catfight make for a stable, expandable pro wrestling fanbase? It obviously wouldn't or TNA's segment by segment ratings would be more consistent. |
|
