|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on Apr 5, 2009 16:06:00 GMT -5
I like how everyone hates on TNA for bringing in guys like Kip James. Then Stevie Richards comes in, who is even worse, and everyone loves it. And how is Kip James a better talent than Richards? |
|
|
|
Post by laythvandam on Apr 5, 2009 16:07:53 GMT -5
I'm glad Stevie has been brung to TNA, he was disgustingly underused by WWE.
He'll make some good TV, I can see it.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 28, 2024 2:47:31 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2009 17:03:19 GMT -5
by what possible measure is billy gunn better than stevie richards? Ok maybe that was a slight exaggeration. But Billy Gunn is at least a bigger name, although that's not really important because it's not like either is capable of making money for the company at all. Regardless, nobody like these two would be beneficial to TNA. I just don't get why everyone always says to stop with the rejects, and then everyone loves Stevie coming.Stevie wasn't hired because he's a former WWE wrestler, he was hired because he's friends with Terry Taylor. Ever since Daivari, TNA hasn't hired any so called "WWE rejects" and that's going to continue since Boogeyman will probably be hired too because he's Booker BFF, not because he's a "WWE reject". |
|
|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on Apr 5, 2009 17:05:26 GMT -5
Ok maybe that was a slight exaggeration. But Billy Gunn is at least a bigger name, although that's not really important because it's not like either is capable of making money for the company at all. Regardless, nobody like these two would be beneficial to TNA. I just don't get why everyone always says to stop with the rejects, and then everyone loves Stevie coming.Stevie wasn't hired because he's a former WWE wrestler, he was hired because he's friends with Terry Taylor. Ever since Daivari, TNA hasn't hired any so called "WWE rejects" and that's going to continue since Boogeyman will probably be hired too because he's Booker BFF, not because he's a "WWE reject". But being in the fed doesn't hurt. |
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy on Apr 5, 2009 17:50:09 GMT -5
and to me, stevie hardly qualifies as a wwe "reject". someone like billy gunn is a reject because WWE gave him a million chances to get over and he never could, because he sucks. outside of being the mouthpiece for the Right to Censor, when did Stevie ever get any sort of a decent push for more than 2 weeks?
|
|
|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on Apr 5, 2009 17:51:43 GMT -5
and to me, stevie hardly qualifies as a wwe "reject". someone like billy gunn is a reject because WWE gave him a million chances to get over and he never could, because he sucks. outside of being the mouthpiece for the Right to Censor, when did Stevie ever get any sort of a decent push for more than 2 weeks? Hey..Stevie Night Heat was an awesome show  |
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Apr 5, 2009 19:03:15 GMT -5
He's a great talent. I just don't want them to write him into a corner. which i can definetly see, which will have been the 100th time they did it with talent that was in another business. |
|
