|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Apr 8, 2009 13:40:33 GMT -5
What's the diffrence between Danny having a match with Eric and Rourke "knocking out" WWE's top heel and it going nowhere? But, that was okay.. Because Rourke is a well known name, i can safely say i have never heard of Bonaduce before, mainly because no-one cares about him. Its not as if Rourke was even in a damn match, whereas this guy is. Hes taking up valuable air time when they could of had a decent match. I've never heard of Rourke until "The Wrestler". It's not like Danny is going to be wrestling the top heel or babyface. It's wrestling Eric Young. I don't see a problem with it as long as Young isn't buried. |
|
|
|
Post by the franchise on Apr 8, 2009 13:54:49 GMT -5
I say Bonaduce pins him in the middle of the ring.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Apr 8, 2009 14:38:43 GMT -5
Because Rourke is a well known name, i can safely say i have never heard of Bonaduce before, mainly because no-one cares about him. Its not as if Rourke was even in a damn match, whereas this guy is. Hes taking up valuable air time when they could of had a decent match. I've never heard of Rourke until "The Wrestler". It's not like Danny is going to be wrestling the top heel or babyface. It's wrestling Eric Young. I don't see a problem with it as long as Young isn't buried. Many people hadn't but at least Rourke is VERY well known because of it. Bonaduce hasn't been relevant since the 70s. |
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Apr 8, 2009 15:03:41 GMT -5
Because Rourke is a well known name, i can safely say i have never heard of Bonaduce before, mainly because no-one cares about him. Its not as if Rourke was even in a damn match, whereas this guy is. Hes taking up valuable air time when they could of had a decent match. . It's not like Danny is going to be wrestling the top heel or babyface. It's wrestling Eric Young. I don't see a problem with it as long as Young isn't buried.  |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Apr 8, 2009 15:05:06 GMT -5
I've never heard of Rourke until "The Wrestler". It's not like Danny is going to be wrestling the top heel or babyface. It's wrestling Eric Young. I don't see a problem with it as long as Young isn't buried. I'm just not a "movie buff". That's mainly why. |
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Apr 8, 2009 15:20:04 GMT -5
There's a big difference between Rourke and Danny. WWE atleast went the direction of separating the wrestlers from Mickey. They commended him on a good job ACTING as a wrestler, but by no means made any claims that he was an actual wrestler.
As opposed to TNA, who reach out to celebrity for some MUCH NEEDED press, throw them in the ring as if they've been wresting for years, hoping that they will magically put on a clinic and that people will care.
2 words:
Pacman Jones.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Apr 8, 2009 16:22:25 GMT -5
I'm just not a "movie buff". That's mainly why. Did you see Sin City? Cause he was in that. |
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Apr 8, 2009 16:35:09 GMT -5
I'm just not a "movie buff". That's mainly why. Did you see Sin City? Cause he was in that. woah was that really mickey rourke first time i saw rourke in a film was in Grindhouse |
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Apr 8, 2009 17:30:01 GMT -5
Its like comparing rosie o donell to Julia roberts
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan17: The Total Package on Apr 8, 2009 18:17:10 GMT -5
Its like comparing rosie o donell to Julia roberts lol |
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Apr 8, 2009 18:45:26 GMT -5
What's the diffrence between Danny having a match with Eric and Rourke "knocking out" WWE's top heel and it going nowhere? But, that was okay.. Because Rourke is a well known name, i can safely say i have never heard of Bonaduce before, mainly because no-one cares about him. Its not as if Rourke was even in a damn match, whereas this guy is. Hes taking up valuable air time when they could of had a decent match. Yeah.. Bonaduce is the same level as Rourke? Maybe before the wrestler but not now. He won many awards and was nominated for an oscar so I think he is like 100 times better than Danny. . . I didn't like the Rourke stuff either but it wasn't depressing like this sh*t.  |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Apr 8, 2009 18:55:33 GMT -5
Because Rourke is a well known name, i can safely say i have never heard of Bonaduce before, mainly because no-one cares about him. Its not as if Rourke was even in a damn match, whereas this guy is. Hes taking up valuable air time when they could of had a decent match. Yeah.. Bonaduce is the same level as Rourke? Maybe before the wrestler but not now. He won many awards and was nominated for an oscar so I think he is like 100 times better than Danny. . . I didn't like the Rourke stuff either but it wasn't depressing like this sh*t. Yeah, Rourke "knocking out" is way more "depressing" than this/ |
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy on Apr 8, 2009 20:26:24 GMT -5
Yeah.. Bonaduce is the same level as Rourke? Maybe before the wrestler but not now. He won many awards and was nominated for an oscar so I think he is like 100 times better than Danny. . . I didn't like the Rourke stuff either but it wasn't depressing like this sh*t. Yeah, Rourke "knocking out" is way more "depressing" than this/ rourke took a few years off from acting to be a boxer. he's legit tough. danny bonaduce is a roid-taking, child star ginger  . |
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Apr 8, 2009 20:53:26 GMT -5
hes a ing d class celeb |
|
|
|
Post by Lewscher on Apr 9, 2009 17:14:56 GMT -5
I say Bonaduce pins him in the middle of the ring. i say bonaduche goes out on a stretcher no offense but as much as i admire his willing to suceed like in hogans CCW , he ed up so much, and was so rusty then again he is a rookie and time can hopefully help but i dont expect much from danny, then again this is danny and will wanna show off again and up,  im not against him im just saying the truth...... -he voluntered to go over the rope for RVD and ed up -he voluntered to get him by goldberg and got made to lok like a pu$$y, lol |
|
BIGticket5
Main Eventer
add me: www.myspace/rostafer_23
Joined on: Jan 26, 2002 20:01:11 GMT -5
Posts: 1,745
|
Post by BIGticket5 on Apr 10, 2009 3:18:55 GMT -5
What's the diffrence between Danny having a match with Eric and Rourke "knocking out" WWE's top heel and it going nowhere? But, that was okay.. Because Rourke is a well known name, i can safely say i have never heard of Bonaduce before, mainly because no-one cares about him. Its not as if Rourke was even in a damn match, whereas this guy is. Hes taking up valuable air time when they could of had a decent match. danny bonaduce is just as well known if not moreso than mickey rourke. he has been famous for many, many years. he just isn't taken very seriously anymore b/c of his past drug use and string of reality shows he has appeared on. |
|
Zincdust
Main Eventer
WF 20+ Year Member
WF Day 1 Member
Redefining "Old Toy Weirdo"
Joined on: Dec 18, 2001 15:13:21 GMT -5
Posts: 3,537
|
Post by Zincdust on Apr 10, 2009 9:46:28 GMT -5
Did you see Sin City? Cause he was in that. woah was that really mickey rourke first time i saw rourke in a film was in Grindhouse Where was Rourke in Grindhouse? Or are you thinking of Bruce Willis? Because Willis was in both Sin City and Grindhouse... |
|
|
|
Post by Lennon on Apr 10, 2009 13:59:05 GMT -5
Because Rourke is a well known name, i can safely say i have never heard of Bonaduce before, mainly because no-one cares about him. Its not as if Rourke was even in a damn match, whereas this guy is. Hes taking up valuable air time when they could of had a decent match. danny bonaduce is just as well known if not moreso than mickey rourke. he has been famous for many, many years. he just isn't taken very seriously anymore b/c of his past drug use and string of reality shows he has appeared on. ......No..... |
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Apr 10, 2009 14:31:08 GMT -5
Because Rourke is a well known name, i can safely say i have never heard of Bonaduce before, mainly because no-one cares about him. Its not as if Rourke was even in a damn match, whereas this guy is. Hes taking up valuable air time when they could of had a decent match. danny bonaduce is just as well known if not moreso than mickey rourke. he has been famous for many, many years. he just isn't taken very seriously anymore b/c of his past drug use and string of reality shows he has appeared on. are you for real? bonaduce is not nearly as well known as rourke. |
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Apr 10, 2009 15:46:05 GMT -5
Lets put it this way. There's a reason WWE got Mickey Rourke, and TNA got Danny Bonaduce.
That statement alone should show you what level each person is on.
|
|
