Deleted
Joined on: Oct 1, 2024 8:28:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2009 10:42:41 GMT -5
TNA is far better than WWE right now, in my opinion. Their shows are way more entertaining, and the storylines are pretty good. However, the MEM thing has ran it's course, but back when it first started, it was the hottest thing in wrestling.
|
|
|
|
Post by AdamBomb on Jul 18, 2009 10:55:21 GMT -5
When someone asks for an opinion over what I prefer, and I think one of the options is a huge steaming pile of horse****, I tend to not want to sugarcoat it. I don't think of it as 'trashing TNA' - I think of it as being perfectly honest. I think WWE is for 8 year olds now - just as long as we're being perfectly honest. Okay, while will still being honest, when I turn on TNA and see the absolutely terrible characters, bad acting, terrible announcing, lack of selling, bad language for the sake of just doing it, and the unbelievable amount of ads, videos, and interviews.... I think TNA has to be for people who have developmental problems and are flat out morons. I can't fathom how anyone sits through that show - and YES, I do watch it... well, I try to at least. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 1, 2024 8:28:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2009 11:02:34 GMT -5
TNA is starting to get repetative. All there storylines have one guy betrays the other, then the other says "now its personal" and they feud for months on and off. Also, every episode somehow ends the MEM beating up Foley/Jarret or the other way around.
|
|
|
|
Post by Calcifer Boheme on Jul 18, 2009 11:21:24 GMT -5
While wrestling has always been at it's best when the lines of reality are blurred, TNA just doesn't do it well. Most of the time, their angles don't even make sense. It makes me sad because I want to like TNA and am a fan of a lot of the workers. But I just get so frustrated watching them. Not Lance Storm level frustrated, but it still irks me.
WWE, though, can be amazing when they want. Smackdown is the best example of that right now. Punk/Hardy is amazing. They are letting Punk shine on the mic, and Hardy has been more interesting to me than he has been in a long time. Raw is definitely not as good, though I'm enjoying the MVP/Swagger feud.
But overall, I'd say WWE is far better than TNA
|
|
|
|
Post by Quanthor on Jul 18, 2009 13:07:55 GMT -5
I think WWE is for 8 year olds now - just as long as we're being perfectly honest. Okay, while will still being honest, when I turn on TNA and see the absolutely terrible characters, bad acting, terrible announcing, lack of selling, bad language for the sake of just doing it, and the unbelievable amount of ads, videos, and interviews.... I think TNA has to be for people who have developmental problems and are flat out morons. I can't fathom how anyone sits through that show - and YES, I do watch it... well, I try to at least. All those things and the really terribly chaotic camera movements makes TNA nearly impossible to watch. It's not even funny bad like WCW Thunder, it's just plain...bad. I feel substantially stupider every time I attempt to watch their programs. The sad thing is they use to rely on their talent to put on great matches but I can't even remember the last time they even had a four star caliber match. Everything ends in controversy which destroys any chance they have of putting on excellent performances. How TNA stays on air is a bigger mystery then what happened to D.B. Cooper. |
|
