|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on Jul 20, 2009 19:47:21 GMT -5
A littler more info: Wrestling Observer editor Dave Meltzer wrote a brief note on the www.f4wonline.com message board to say that it was actually Dixie Carter's decision for Jeff Jarrett to step away from his duties in TNA, not Jarrett's. "It was not Jeff's decision. It was Dixie's decision," Meltzer wrote. "Very complicated issue. In fact, more complicated than anyone would believe." It should be noted that there was a rumor going around among TNA personnel backstage at last night's show saying Jarrett was suspended. I read that message as well and personally unless Dixie cites her reasons, it just furthers my convictions that TNA has no understanding of how to run itself.
|
|
|
Post by danikzz on Jul 20, 2009 20:00:15 GMT -5
Yeah, he can "claim" all the poop he wants, but I doubt Dixie gives a damn a man who's wife passed two years ago is dating his fellow employee's ex. Trust me, she cares! Everyone heard the rumors and Dixie said she wouldn't do anything about it until she heard some concrete info. Then at Jeff's 4th of July party, a drunk Karen was bragging to everyone, including Dixie, about how great Jeff was in bed. That is what broke the camels back. Sure it wasn't the Iron Shiek?
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Jul 20, 2009 22:03:44 GMT -5
Doesn't seem like this story has any real credibility to it. I personally still think it's TNA's attempt at a worked shoot. - Triple S these are my thoughts as well. i mean, it's causing enough attention.
|
|
MR._SOCKO
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 2, 2002 11:08:22 GMT -5
Posts: 4,268
|
Post by MR._SOCKO on Jul 21, 2009 8:00:50 GMT -5
Smells like a work to me.
|
|
|
Post by laythvandam on Jul 21, 2009 8:13:21 GMT -5
I'm suspicious of this whole thing now, I think it has worked all over it.
Seriously think Dixie would try and oust Jarrett, I doubt it.
I'd love to know where you're getting all this "info" from too.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Jul 21, 2009 10:59:24 GMT -5
all these worked shoots dont change ing anything
|
|
|
Post by Patrick Bateman on Jul 21, 2009 13:36:18 GMT -5
all these worked shoots dont change ing anything It's more interesting than anything WWE has going on right now. They should put this drama on TV in front of a camera, in the words of the great Vince Russo: RATINGS, BAY-BEE~!
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jul 21, 2009 13:37:44 GMT -5
all these worked shoots dont change ing anything It's more interesting than anything WWE has going on right now. They should put this drama on TV in front of a camera, in the words of the great Vince Russo: RATINGS, BAY-BEE~! or tna for that matter
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Jul 21, 2009 13:56:49 GMT -5
all these worked shoots dont change ing anything It's more interesting than anything WWE has going on right now. They should put this drama on TV in front of a camera, in the words of the great Vince Russo: RATINGS, BAY-BEE~! lol that made no sense lol wwe can do whatever the they want they are established tna aint so doing these dumb ass storylines result in NOTHING
|
|
|
Post by The Dude on Jul 21, 2009 14:17:47 GMT -5
Doesn't Jarrett own TNA?
|
|
|
Post by Patrick Bateman on Jul 21, 2009 14:26:16 GMT -5
It's more interesting than anything WWE has going on right now. They should put this drama on TV in front of a camera, in the words of the great Vince Russo: RATINGS, BAY-BEE~! lol that made no sense lol wwe can do whatever the they want they are established tna aint so doing these dumb ass storylines result in NOTHING Again. I'll put it in Mark terms: lol it makes perfect sense cuz both wwe and tna's shows suck so the backstage drama is a lot betta lol
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Jul 21, 2009 14:29:55 GMT -5
oh i get it...then again ppl backstage on wwe could be doing 6 to 10 lines of coke and then writing storylines
|
|
|
Post by The Sexy Psychotic on Jul 21, 2009 14:46:59 GMT -5
all these worked shoots dont change ing anything It's more interesting than anything WWE has going on right now. They should put this drama on TV in front of a camera, in the words of the great Vince Russo: RATINGS, BAY-BEE~! Tbh, it would make sense to put these two on screen together, don't make the issue public, but have these two fighting over peronal problems. If done right it could be like HBk/Hart, Rock/Austin, Edge/Matt, but if done wrong, it could really end up ed up, both onscreen and behind the scenes
|
|
|
Post by Patrick Bateman on Jul 21, 2009 15:51:22 GMT -5
oh i get it...then again ppl backstage on wwe could be doing 6 to 10 lines of coke and then writing storylines Who says they don't do that?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 28, 2024 23:41:46 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2009 22:58:00 GMT -5
This will now all be discussed in the Official thread...
- Triple S
|
|