|
|
Post by Hollywood Asia on Jul 27, 2009 20:25:28 GMT -5
Just because her boobs aren't falling out of her bra dosen't mean she has no body. Have you seen her? She is tiny and skinny |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jul 27, 2009 22:38:03 GMT -5
im all for seeing naked women with tig ol bitties, but i thought TNA was kinda above this. Cause now they're making it out to be a grand event..."oh our girls our naked" . That's not gonna make their product any better and it may alienate some fans. Im sure it'll be good for Playboy though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jul 27, 2009 22:43:38 GMT -5
im all for seeing naked women with tig ol bitties, but i thought TNA was kinda above this. Cause now they're making it out to be a grand event..."oh our girls our naked" . That's not gonna make their product any better and it may alienate some fans. Im sure it'll be good for Playboy though. Basically what Flava Dave mentioned. They had commercials promoting the Knockouts claiming not to be Diva's and such, and now they are posing in Playboy. Kinda hypocritical. |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jul 27, 2009 22:57:48 GMT -5
im all for seeing naked women with tig ol bitties, but i thought TNA was kinda above this. Cause now they're making it out to be a grand event..."oh our girls our naked" . That's not gonna make their product any better and it may alienate some fans. Im sure it'll be good for Playboy though. Basically what Flava Dave mentioned. They had commercials promoting the Knockouts claiming not to be Diva's and such, and now they are posing in Playboy. Kinda hypocritical. And pushing Velvet & Angelina & them raping the ring rope isn't? See what I mean? If those aren't them being hypocritical, then this wouldn't be either. |
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jul 27, 2009 23:03:02 GMT -5
Basically what Flava Dave mentioned. They had commercials promoting the Knockouts claiming not to be Diva's and such, and now they are posing in Playboy. Kinda hypocritical. And pushing Velvet & Angelina & them raping the ring rope isn't? See what I mean? If those aren't them being hypocritical, then this wouldn't be either. Thats just their entrance, showing off they they are hot girls. But not divas, in WWE- the Divas would pose nude for Playboy. Not TNA is doing it, as I said- its hypocritical. |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jul 27, 2009 23:07:01 GMT -5
And pushing Velvet & Angelina & them raping the ring rope isn't? See what I mean? If those aren't them being hypocritical, then this wouldn't be either. Thats just their entrance, showing off they they are hot girls. But not divas, in WWE- the Divas would pose nude for Playboy. Not TNA is doing it, as I said- its hypocritical. If raping a freaking ring rope is "showing they're hot girls" so is being nude in a magazine. There's a major diffrence between getting into a ring and showing you're hot (See someone like Maryse/Melina) and basically saying "Look.. I can rape a ring rope.." Just my two cents. Oh, and I'm not saying that this isn't hypocritical by no means. Just sayin' that so is TBP's entrance/push. |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jul 28, 2009 12:37:57 GMT -5
Thats just their entrance, showing off they they are hot girls. But not divas, in WWE- the Divas would pose nude for Playboy. Not TNA is doing it, as I said- its hypocritical. If raping a freaking ring rope is "showing they're hot girls" so is being nude in a magazine. There's a major diffrence between getting into a ring and showing you're hot (See someone like Maryse/Melina) and basically saying "Look.. I can rape a ring rope.." Just my two cents. Oh, and I'm not saying that this isn't hypocritical by no means. Just sayin' that so is TBP's entrance/push. you lost me SG. there's a big difference between a ring entrance and posing nude in playboy. For one, kids can turn on the tv and see that ring entrance. they cant turn on the tv and see nude women. And i've never looked at them as "raping" the ring ropes. I'm sure the ropes didnt mind. Personally, i just TNA tries to hard to get noticed..ie..Pacman jones, sarah palin, playboy. And there too damn stupid to realize that people want to see good storylines, combined with good wrestling and fresh faces. |
|
|
|
Post by Calcifer Boheme on Jul 30, 2009 15:58:42 GMT -5
I never thought TNA would be above thise... obviously there are some women who aren't going to pose...
But I don't think posing nude hurts credibility at all. Or at least it shouldn't.
I'm also happy that Traci is posing first.
|
|
|
|
Post by lewpacnitdontstop on Jul 30, 2009 22:14:36 GMT -5
Liam would just about die if Velvet Sky was in Playboy Magazine... Somehow I can't see it happening, sure, there's some beautiful women in TNA, but not too many. This could cripple the Knockouts division prestige. Not too many? Victor- err um, Tera, Velvet, Angelina Love, Traci Brooks, Taylor Wylde, Val, the list goes on and on. As long as it aint ODB or Kong, it'll be awesome. |
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Jul 31, 2009 0:39:06 GMT -5
Rape? Those ring ropes are totally asking for it.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 28, 2024 23:44:52 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2009 0:59:07 GMT -5
Which is why Lauren needs to pose... she has neither.. She has no body either  "Hi, my name is Differ, please beg to me." |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jul 31, 2009 1:08:20 GMT -5
"Hi, my name is Differ, please beg to me." Never reliazed how hot she really was until that pic tbh. |
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Wrestling on Aug 1, 2009 12:11:08 GMT -5
"Hi, my name is Differ, please beg to me." Never reliazed how hot she really was until that pic tbh. Agreed. Now, on topic: I can understand why they are doing this, I mean, maybe they realized that when people buy those magazines they might tune in. It's smart business, you could call it hypocritical, but it's still smart business. |
|
|
|
Post by the franchise on Aug 1, 2009 12:44:08 GMT -5
Just because you buy the magazine that is no indication that people would want to watch the wrestling show.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kurt Burton: Script Doctor! on Aug 1, 2009 13:27:09 GMT -5
I really hope they get Kong to pose.
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Wrestling on Aug 1, 2009 13:42:02 GMT -5
Just because you buy the magazine that is no indication that people would want to watch the wrestling show. Not everyone, but I think some will. Also, they'll get more media attention. |
|
|
|
Post by Sam Hain on Aug 1, 2009 20:27:40 GMT -5
I don't really think it's hypocritical. Most of the WWE's diva's are there strictly for their looks. Other than Christy (who is freakin hot!) I can't think of one Knockout that hasn't paid her dues on the indy circuit or in the WWE before making it to TNA.
Also, the WWE's women's division is a joke.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 28, 2024 23:44:52 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2009 20:53:02 GMT -5
I can just see impact in a few weeks lol Kevin Nash, Scott Steiner, JB sitting there in MEM lockeroom looking at Traci's playboy, JB: "wow those are some big Tweets" Steiner: (incoherent babbling)........Big ass boobs"  Lmao. I could totally see that happening. |
|
