Ratedwwe
Main Eventer
WF Divas group member
Joined on: Jul 8, 2007 18:17:49 GMT -5
Posts: 3,105
|
Post by Ratedwwe on Aug 7, 2009 19:20:07 GMT -5
Pro Wrestling Torch reports... TNA officials are considering bringing in former WWE Women's Champion Jazz for a role in the Knockouts division. |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Aug 7, 2009 19:21:35 GMT -5
Yeah, I'll belive it when I see it. Why? She was "rumored" to be in the Knockouts Battle Royal in 07 to crown the first chamion.. that didn't happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy on Aug 7, 2009 19:21:39 GMT -5
I'd rather they bring her husband for WHITE BOY CHALLENGES
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Wrestling on Aug 7, 2009 20:27:28 GMT -5
If I remember correctly, Jazz was a good wrestler back in 2004 in the WWE, but there are too many Knockouts already for a show.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 29, 2024 1:55:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2009 20:35:29 GMT -5
TNA doesnt need Jazz IMO. She has to be like what 40 now?
|
|
|
|
Post by XHW on Aug 7, 2009 20:39:16 GMT -5
ahhh I would pass, nothing amazing, just another knockout to have on their roster and not use imo
|
|
CMC
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 18, 2008 10:34:53 GMT -5
Posts: 2,373
|
Post by CMC on Aug 7, 2009 20:46:52 GMT -5
TNA doesnt need Jazz IMO. She has to be like what 40 now? 35. |
|
|
|
Post by Patrick Bateman on Aug 7, 2009 21:03:47 GMT -5
I'd rather they bring her husband for WHITE BOY CHALLENGES YO YOU KNOW ITS THE MACK MILITANT! |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Aug 7, 2009 22:01:24 GMT -5
Here's the thing about the Knockouts/Wrestlers in General. I've never gotten the "there's to many ____ on the roster". Isn't it better to have to many than not enough? TNA can do alot more with the 16ish Knockouts they have because of the fact it's only one show. The WWE only really has one womens feud for the two belts. TNA is doing 2-3 feuds (including the womens belt). Because, you've got Angelina/ODB right now and Flash/Sarita. You add in the teasing of Traci/Taylor. It works because they don't have to think "Oh crap, in 6 months we won't have anything to do with the knockouts because we've done it all" like the WWE has a problem with sometime. See what I mean? I think TNA should clean out some Knockouts (Sojo, Rhaka, Christy) but the number of Knockouts is fine right now as long as it doesn't become a giant clustersmurf. Just my two cents.
|
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Aug 7, 2009 22:18:25 GMT -5
But dude, with that- you can only fit in so much. So with the 16+ woman wrestlers getting 3 feuds or so on a show, it leaves out a lot of other talent that should be getting used, which aren't. [Male]
|
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Aug 7, 2009 22:23:50 GMT -5
But dude, with that- you can only fit in so much. So with the 16+ woman wrestlers getting 3 feuds or so on a show, it leaves out a lot of other talent that should be getting used, which aren't. [Male] Okay.. so you want to cut the Knockouts down to one feud? That would make sense if they Knockouts didn't draw ratings. No matter what reason(s) people use - the knockouts draw. They deserve the television time over alot of talent even if it means cutting down X-Division time because they draw. If the X-Division starts getting higher rated segmenents - then cut the Knockouts down for them but until then the Knockouts deserve more TV time and with them getting pushed more TNA needs the 16+ women so their storylines don't get stale & boring. |
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Aug 7, 2009 22:32:55 GMT -5
But they certainly do not need 3 separate feuds. Because I can guarantee you that one of those feuds will be a low rating. I mean sure, you can have 2 feuds. 1 for the title and than 1 rivalry feud. Makes sense. But 3 or more, too much. When you bring in the X Division, it's called- Make it draw. The X Division is what got TNA far in the first place, it draws. They seem to have lost faith in the X Division, making it not as important. Especially when you have 3 woman feuds hogging up all the air time. As I said, 2 is perfect. 3 or more is completely overkill.
|
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Aug 7, 2009 23:04:50 GMT -5
But they certainly do not need 3 separate feuds. Because I can guarantee you that one of those feuds will be a low rating. I mean sure, you can have 2 feuds. 1 for the title and than 1 rivalry feud. Makes sense. But 3 or more, too much. When you bring in the X Division, it's called- Make it draw. The X Division is what got TNA far in the first place, it draws. They seem to have lost faith in the X Division, making it not as important. Especially when you have 3 woman feuds hogging up all the air time. As I said, 2 is perfect. 3 or more is completely overkill. Again, not when it draws. If you have 3 feuds with women that can WORK it's good. It's no diffrent than having 3 X-Division Feuds or Heavyweight feuds at all. As long as it draws - why stop? Makes no sense tbh. I guess we'll just agree to dis-agree.  |
|
|
|
Post by Lita's Lover on Aug 8, 2009 0:56:29 GMT -5
They really don't need Jazz. They have plenty of female talent already
|
|
|
|
Post by machoking on Aug 8, 2009 6:22:30 GMT -5
I've always been a Jazz fan, so I'd love to see her join TNA.
|
|
|
|
Post by dmallett4 on Aug 8, 2009 7:21:52 GMT -5
But they certainly do not need 3 separate feuds. Because I can guarantee you that one of those feuds will be a low rating. I mean sure, you can have 2 feuds. 1 for the title and than 1 rivalry feud. Makes sense. But 3 or more, too much. When you bring in the X Division, it's called- Make it draw. The X Division is what got TNA far in the first place, it draws. They seem to have lost faith in the X Division, making it not as important. Especially when you have 3 woman feuds hogging up all the air time. As I said, 2 is perfect. 3 or more is completely overkill. Again, not when it draws. If you have 3 feuds with women that can WORK it's good. It's no diffrent than having 3 X-Division Feuds or Heavyweight feuds at all. As long as it draws - why stop? Makes no sense tbh. I guess we'll just agree to dis-agree. what segments have been drawing high since the gail kim/kong feud ended? |
|
|
|
Post by laythvandam on Aug 8, 2009 7:37:38 GMT -5
I hope Jazz doesn't come, she's long past her best.
|
|
|
|
Post by White Trash Lucha on Aug 8, 2009 8:37:03 GMT -5
I'd rather they bring her husband for WHITE BOY CHALLENGES The first thing that came into my head when I saw Jazz We want Mack!  |
|
|
|
Post by The Silent Flute (joepetree) on Aug 8, 2009 12:17:30 GMT -5
Id really rather see Lita Come Back and become knockout Champion
|
|
|
|
Post by WCWA Online on Aug 8, 2009 12:24:14 GMT -5
the line "TNA Interested in former a WWE.." anything needs to stop being said. Develop your own stars, TNA, stop bottom feeding off WWE's cast aways. There's plenty of ultra talented women out there. You want a super dominant, muscle girl? Try to get Sara Del Ray. Stop living off of whatever WWE throws away.
TNA: We Are Dumpster Divers
|
|
