Adam235
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 25, 2007 14:30:36 GMT -5
Posts: 4,844
|
Post by Adam235 on Sept 2, 2009 16:26:57 GMT -5
Love the idea. Surprisingly I've been doing 6 PPVs a year for my wrestling figure fed for quite awhile. Allows a longer build up for the big title matches.
|
|
|
|
Post by irishcurse64 on Sept 2, 2009 16:48:11 GMT -5
I would like it if WWE and TNA went to 6 PPVs a year.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 29, 2024 10:35:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2009 17:15:24 GMT -5
I would like it if WWE and TNA went to 6 PPVs a year. You may get your wish for 6 PPVs for TNA but I feel WWE is at a stage and because of how big the product is it really can not go back to just six PPVs. WWE needs a PPV each month. |
|
|
|
Post by wwfepenguin on Sept 2, 2009 18:26:38 GMT -5
Dixie has finally got it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is a great idea, b/c i never buy TNA ppv's incase they arn't going to worth my 3 hours. So having them every two months would rock, and Impact would be a hell of a lot better. Anyone recall when WWF only had 4 ppv's and it was great. Thank you Dixie!  |
|
|
|
Post by 6 seasons and a movie on Sept 2, 2009 22:39:15 GMT -5
I wouldn't mind seeing TNA only have 6-8 pay per views and then maybe do a live impact or a special impact every so often in the months they don't have a ppv.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 29, 2024 10:35:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2009 8:58:05 GMT -5
They should definatly stick to the current format, with only 6 PPVs a year it would just be Sting,Foley etc in the main event in every single one.
By having them monthly it gives more chance that younger, newer stars will appear on the card
|
|
