|
|
Post by XHW on Sept 9, 2009 13:36:43 GMT -5
I don't think it would be good
|
|
|
|
Post by Swarm on Sept 9, 2009 14:12:53 GMT -5
It's not exactly like it could be much worse than the product is already.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lewscher on Sept 9, 2009 14:26:33 GMT -5
I <3 that girl who has that "What am i doing here?" look on her face  peopard type jacket?? us lol i agree  and i agree and get what your saying, TNA's idea of action is interviews and backstage goble-dee-gook..... just awesome matches would be cool and but not all the in ring intro's just on the way down is cool, make them EARN! that title and not go with fan favourite(jeff/cena) and then it'll be like NWA prestigeness and awesome-ness..... just dont go all kicks, n holdsand guards.... keep the wrestling still, but TNA will go ott as usual, BUT I STILL LOVE TNA'S PRODUCT ;D more-so before christians time but his time was awesome, im not dissing him as i love his charisma but after he's main run it was crap with steiner and angle |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 29, 2024 10:46:56 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2009 20:42:44 GMT -5
Frank Trigg VS AJ Styles said it all... I actully enjoyed that tbh. I know, I know.. "I enjoy everything TNA does" but still. I thought it was entertaining. I know, but the reaction from the ImpactZone faithful said it all really...Especially when they were chanting 'We Want Fake Wrestling!'  |
|
eddie eddie
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 17, 2009 17:54:26 GMT -5
Posts: 2,873
|
Post by eddie eddie on Sept 9, 2009 21:00:23 GMT -5
i dont think that the US audience would be into fake mma. theres already so many people whod rather watch UFC, etc. over wrestling because its of fakeness. i dont understand why any of those people would begin to watch a fake version of something already out there. and theyd lose the attention of the niche of fans that watch wrestling for wrestling.
aaand i dont think tna could actually pull it off correctly for more than one match.
|
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Sept 9, 2009 21:19:46 GMT -5
I actully enjoyed that tbh. I know, I know.. "I enjoy everything TNA does" but still. I thought it was entertaining. I know, but the reaction from the ImpactZone faithful said it all really...Especially when they were chanting 'We Want Fake Wrestling!' It wasn't in the iMPACT Zone.  |
|
|
|
Post by Mr. McCluer on Sept 9, 2009 21:34:34 GMT -5
They have wrestlers not MMA fighters. Matches are predetermined and MMA bouts are not. No offense but this is a horrible idea. I know but its all about presentation. The UFC gives us pro wrestling style backstories and what not. Why can't wrestling use the sports rules etc. to present themselves? |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 29, 2024 10:46:56 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2009 22:46:50 GMT -5
I know, but the reaction from the ImpactZone faithful said it all really...Especially when they were chanting 'We Want Fake Wrestling!' It wasn't in the iMPACT Zone. Erm..Sorry...I know that too, but it seems like the same fans from the ImpactZone go to all the same TNA shows, PPV or otherwise...They know what they want, as do we, eh?  |
|
Ben
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
Hi.
Joined on: Aug 1, 2009 22:41:23 GMT -5
Posts: 3,800
|
Post by Ben on Sept 11, 2009 23:05:33 GMT -5
Im fine with ranking but the rest sounds like a bad idea
|
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Sept 11, 2009 23:10:29 GMT -5
If TNA offered more Mussel Shoals Mammajammas, I might not get bored so quickly.
|
|
|
|
Post by kahnspiricy on Sept 11, 2009 23:13:50 GMT -5
What will be the point of TNAWRESTLING then?
|
|
|
|
Post by Heresy on Sept 12, 2009 20:43:13 GMT -5
I always thought TNA should incorporate aspects of MMA into their product to differentiate from Sports Entertainment. Does that mean having weight classes or matches consisting of three five-minute rounds? No. It means producing a show that emphasizes competition over entertainment for entertainment's sake. It means having several guys ready to challenge the champ instead of circulating the same two or three. Each division would have it's own set of guys and the belts that represent them would be treated equally. An X-division guy taking on a Heavyweight would be considered a big deal and not just a squash match. The Heavyweight titles would be thought of as no more prestigious than the Tag team or Heavyweight or Knockout titles. That's what I think of when the concept of incorporating MMA into Pro Wrestling comes to mind.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Sept 13, 2009 12:29:47 GMT -5
Matches are predetermined and MMA bouts are not. Yeah like MMA organizations always throw the "top contender" against a guy. People often pay to see a guy get destroyed. People know the outcome. Look at how EliteXC crumbled. They booked Kimbo against crap and made him look good, then he got beat by a real fighter. Plus the fact I know a guy who actually WROTE WFA. As much as I even enjoy UFC, to say matches are predetermined in a way is bullsh*t. |
|
Deep Shadows
Main Eventer
MXW 6 is here! https://youtu.be/LiDlNuiKmjA
Joined on: Jul 7, 2006 2:39:30 GMT -5
Posts: 3,504
|
Post by Deep Shadows on Sept 14, 2009 1:08:39 GMT -5
Most of you that responded don't get what he's saying.
I think an organization that would adopt the good from each era of wrestling and incorporate some MMA presentation could really hit it big right now.
You take 80's era, early 90's, a splash of new era and some MMA and you've got greatness.
I think what the biggest thing that's wrong with pro wrestling today is most feel like..."hey, most people know it's "fake" so why try and make them think otherwise." That's pretty much why WWE has gone to sh*t and TNA is headed that way because they're more concerned about competing with WWE than anything else.
|
|
|
|
Post by ortonisgod on Sept 14, 2009 15:11:49 GMT -5
I always thought TNA should incorporate aspects of MMA into their product to differentiate from Sports Entertainment. Does that mean having weight classes or matches consisting of three five-minute rounds? No. It means producing a show that emphasizes competition over entertainment for entertainment's sake. It means having several guys ready to challenge the champ instead of circulating the same two or three. Each division would have it's own set of guys and the belts that represent them would be treated equally. An X-division guy taking on a Heavyweight would be considered a big deal and not just a squash match. The Heavyweight titles would be thought of as no more prestigious than the Tag team or Heavyweight or Knockout titles. That's what I think of when the concept of incorporating MMA into Pro Wrestling comes to mind. This is exactly what i was saying but i might not have been quite as clear. I didn't mean actually incorpate mma into the in ring product, i simply meant presenting wrestling like more of a legitimate fighting sport ala UFC. With real enforced rules, standards, and divisions. Real life storylines without bad comedy. But with worked pro wrasslin matches ;D |
|
|
|
Post by OmegaGaijin on Sept 14, 2009 15:39:33 GMT -5
I always thought TNA should incorporate aspects of MMA into their product to differentiate from Sports Entertainment. Does that mean having weight classes or matches consisting of three five-minute rounds? No. It means producing a show that emphasizes competition over entertainment for entertainment's sake. It means having several guys ready to challenge the champ instead of circulating the same two or three. Each division would have it's own set of guys and the belts that represent them would be treated equally. An X-division guy taking on a Heavyweight would be considered a big deal and not just a squash match. The Heavyweight titles would be thought of as no more prestigious than the Tag team or Heavyweight or Knockout titles. That's what I think of when the concept of incorporating MMA into Pro Wrestling comes to mind. This is exactly what i was saying but i might not have been quite as clear. I didn't mean actually incorpate mma into the in ring product, i simply meant presenting wrestling like more of a legitimate fighting sport ala UFC. With real enforced rules, standards, and divisions. Real life storylines without bad comedy. But with worked pro wrasslin matches ;D i get what both of you are saying,i agree. |
|
|
|
Post by L 0 T T 0 on Sept 16, 2009 0:20:18 GMT -5
I wonder how Spike TV execs would feel about this Thread. Survey says?  LOL |
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Sept 16, 2009 1:47:13 GMT -5
No, it wont work at all, horrible idea and will drive TNA downwards not upwards.
|
|
