|
|
Post by LtD73 on Sept 26, 2009 4:30:06 GMT -5
WWE Creative arent happy about the upcoming HIAC, they are not in favour of the 3 HIAC matches in 1 night, and as blood is still not allowed, they are finding it difficult to plan the matches.
The talent involved arent happy with the concept either, the veterans think that that many HIAC matches will steal focus from each other.
There are currently plans to have the IC triple threat as a ladder match, that may be scrapped due to the TLC match last month and the upcoming TLC ppv.
Wrestlezone
|
|
Conor
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 18, 2008 17:27:35 GMT -5
Posts: 1,199
|
Post by Conor on Sept 26, 2009 4:51:26 GMT -5
Creative arn't the only ones not happy!
They should just have hbk vs cody rhodes on raw and say winner gets to choose the stipulation at hiac (legacy would have to have been complaining to the gm beforehand for it to make sense) then rhodes cheat to win and choose a different type of match like a chase the midget match etc
|
|
|
|
Post by The L.F.C Fan on Sept 26, 2009 5:42:56 GMT -5
Hopefully they change it. Ladder IC Title Match sounds awesome though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Elliot on Sept 26, 2009 6:37:12 GMT -5
And I can guarantee that the veterans mentioned were the Undertaker, Triple H and Shawn Michaels. Those three guys pretty much revolutionized the match and don't want to see it go down the pan, and I don't blame them. I can guarantee that the Hell in a Cell match will no longer be looked at as a huge, destructive match it once was because by the time the PPV is over, it will be overly done and nobody will want to see it again. It will be exactly the same with Tables, Ladders and Chairs.
Even No Way Out and it's multiple Elimination Chambers has ruined that match type. It used to be one of my favorites, but now that they are over using it with two in one night, it's not as exciting anymore. And the fact that an Elimination Chamber match kicked off last years No Way Out was even worse.
|
|
ROHWorld_Steven
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 1, 2006 14:55:13 GMT -5
Posts: 1,516
|
Post by ROHWorld_Steven on Sept 26, 2009 6:40:03 GMT -5
It's kind of ironic that they're actually called the 'Creative Team'...
|
|
bencw
Main Eventer
30 refs. aka ecworiginal.
Joined on: Dec 22, 2008 8:04:49 GMT -5
Posts: 4,273
|
Post by bencw on Sept 26, 2009 6:41:09 GMT -5
wow, they're saying this with little over a week to go
failure to prepare is preparing to fail?
|
|
|
|
Post by Vitamin Z on Sept 26, 2009 6:53:20 GMT -5
These theme PPVs are a terrible idea to begin with.
|
|
Ryan
Main Eventer
True Join Date: 2006
Joined on: Jun 22, 2008 5:35:29 GMT -5
Posts: 1,638
|
Post by Ryan on Sept 26, 2009 6:53:51 GMT -5
I have never liked the idea of having so many HIAC matches in the one night, it takes the away the buzz from the match if they have 3. I also wasn't in favor of having 2 Elimination Chamber matches at No Way Out, even though it didn't turn out to be that bad it just takes away the hype for these type of matches.
|
|
|
|
Post by ericbischoff on Sept 26, 2009 8:09:57 GMT -5
Creative arn't the only ones not happy! They should just have hbk vs cody rhodes on raw and say winner gets to choose the stipulation at hiac (legacy would have to have been complaining to the gm beforehand for it to make sense) then rhodes cheat to win and choose a different type of match like a chase the midget match etc That actual sound like as good idea. But not chasing the midget, lol. Maybe Cody Rhodes and Ted DiBiase Vs Shawn Michaels in handicap match and Triple H not allowed to near the ring, otherwise DQ or something like as that. To be honest, they only made their match as hell in a cell because of Triple H. That suppose be main event, but WWE shows thgat they not care about ECW Champion, as ECW Champion wont be Hell in a Cell match, how lame was that? Orton vs Cena... Thats better be LAST one, even Cena says last RAW but that wont be last one, for sure. |
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Sept 26, 2009 8:16:31 GMT -5
How can anyone be happy? Seriously, these match themed PPVs detract from the 'aura' of the certain match types. Having 3 HIAC in one night is way overdone and reduces the impact that it has.
Match themed PPVs are the stupidest idea.
|
|
Vintage ToneBoat
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 27, 2008 14:17:16 GMT -5
Posts: 2,097
|
Post by Vintage ToneBoat on Sept 26, 2009 8:21:28 GMT -5
this is what happens when you make match types the theme of the ppv...this a russo/tna idea...wwe should left well enough alone. These new names are cheezier than a chese pizza. whats next an all "on a pole" ppv?
|
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Sept 26, 2009 10:04:14 GMT -5
So wait...if Creative doesn't like it...and the talent doesn't like it...and the fans don't like it...then why in the blue hell are they doing it?
|
|
|
|
Post by Elliot on Sept 26, 2009 10:12:11 GMT -5
So wait...if Creative doesn't like it...and the talent doesn't like it...and the fans don't like it...then why in the blue hell are they doing it? Because they thrive on disappointment and misery... |
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Sept 26, 2009 11:42:53 GMT -5
So wait...if Creative doesn't like it...and the talent doesn't like it...and the fans don't like it...then why in the blue hell are they doing it? I can only assume Vince is probably the one who likes it |
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Wrestling on Sept 26, 2009 11:54:28 GMT -5
When even WWE's Creative team doesn't like an idea, it is a sign that it sucks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Phantom on Sept 26, 2009 12:35:51 GMT -5
All the other matches on the card will be shortened and all the Cells will be watered down. Yeah, it's a bad idea.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Sept 26, 2009 14:07:16 GMT -5
Creative arn't the only ones not happy! /quote] Exactly what I was thinking. |
|
|
|
Post by irishcurse64 on Sept 26, 2009 14:14:10 GMT -5
I guess the creative team isn't to creative, are they?I hate gimmick PPVs.Just like everyone else said,it takes away from the match when you see 3 in one night.That 3 way ladder match would have probably been sweet though.
|
|
|
|
Post by miserere on Sept 26, 2009 14:49:04 GMT -5
I also hate gimmick pay-per-views. An event with all 5-person tag team matches? Whose idea was that?
|
|
|
|
Post by Edge618 on Sept 26, 2009 14:56:52 GMT -5
The concepts are stupid, it backs them into a corner. Look, the HIAC PPV is in 1 week, so after that happens, lets say 5 months from now theres a real hot feud that just needs a huge blow off match. Well then creative has to sit down and say "Well we can't have HIAC because of the PPV, TLC is out, it cant be an I Quit or hardcore match because we have to save those for Extreme Rules. " Its really stupid. What HIAC are people going to buy HIAC for?? I think that majority want to see Punk/Taker over Cena/Orton. They could have easily kept it No Mercy, and still had Punk/Taker in HIAC. It would mean more since it wouldnt have the others to take way from it, and no one cares too much about the Cena/Orton one. And it also makes the undercard look even worse. When they put a graphic up on Raw, saying "Hell In A Cell: Triple Threat Match for the US Championship". Its confusing, i didnt know if it would be in HIAC, no we know its not, and it makes it look a lot lesser than the main events. Which the undercard should be, but not so clearly. They just drew a distinct line between undercard and main event. The undercard wont be able to blur the lines with a great match because it wont even be under the same circumstances as the main events.
|
|
