|
Post by kev85hasbro on Oct 29, 2009 17:04:36 GMT -5
unbelievably crap... I'm sure they will end up ending the wwf mattell contract shortly
terrible 1 out of 10 I could make better
|
|
dam
Main Eventer
Number 4? I wanna be number 1
Joined on: Jan 22, 2008 18:57:58 GMT -5
Posts: 3,024
|
Post by dam on Oct 29, 2009 17:09:32 GMT -5
unbelievably crap... I'm sure they will end up ending the wwf mattell contract shortly terrible 1 out of 10 I could make better wwf? Dude what are you talking about?
|
|
|
Post by kev85hasbro on Oct 29, 2009 17:11:33 GMT -5
ok then WWE just for you. I'm telling the truth, theyre dog shit
|
|
|
Post by Dan88 on Oct 29, 2009 17:26:49 GMT -5
ok then WWE just for you. I'm telling the truth, theyre dog poop An opinion is not truth, its just that, an opinion
|
|
rvd_mr_ppv
Main Eventer
Courage, Honor, Loyalty, Sacrifice. You're braver than you think.
Joined on: Sept 1, 2002 11:20:16 GMT -5
Posts: 2,600
|
Post by rvd_mr_ppv on Oct 29, 2009 19:53:25 GMT -5
ok then WWE just for you. I'm telling the truth, theyre dog poop An opinion is not truth, its just that, an opinion Agreed! Just because they're not Hasbros! , , Jakks had the line for 13 years & nothing they did straight away was amazing, it took time. This is only Mattel's first line ups with Singles, 2-Packs, Entrance Greats & Elites & already, they have done a far better start off job than Jakks ever did & have made some of their later pieces that were awesome look mediocre compared to these bad boys & things will only get better & improve over time just like it did for Jakks. If you're gonna give a highly rated opinion on them being crap or only score them a 1 out of 10, at least state why or give reasons, because in my opinion, a 1 out of 10 is just laughable without excuse or reasoning to back it up. Although, if you were giving a 1 out of 10 for Flex Force, then I could 100% agree with that, although, we all have to remember, that's the kids line anyways so they're not catered for to us.
|
|
hitman1072
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 9, 2005 1:43:07 GMT -5
Posts: 1,495
|
Post by hitman1072 on Oct 30, 2009 0:57:28 GMT -5
unbelievably crap... I'm sure they will end up ending the wwf mattell contract shortly terrible 1 out of 10 I could make better The WWF Mattell contract huh? That right there shows us all we need to know about you.
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of Lime Green Jello! on Oct 30, 2009 2:48:29 GMT -5
Lol yeah right, look at the Batista, Triple H and Cena, they all have the same torso, and the HHH/Batista molds are pretty much the exact same, minus the boots. Even Kofi and Bourne's torso's are both the same. I'd be willing to bet money that each wrestler don't get their own torso either. That might be true...but the main problem with Jakks wasn't body reuse, it was that the bodies sucked. They were more realistic than Mattel's body molds.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 28, 2024 12:04:27 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2009 4:21:21 GMT -5
Lack of torsos?? wtf are u smokkn.... every figure is shaped uniquely. Can't u see thaT?! they don't use the same torsos for all superstars like they do in Jakks..... Mattels Figs are all made from scratch! Lol yeah right, look at the Batista, Triple H and Cena, they all have the same torso, and the HHH/Batista molds are pretty much the exact same, minus the boots. Even Kofi and Bourne's torso's are both the same. I'd be willing to bet money that each wrestler don't get their own torso either. Wow you're right about all three having the same torso but you're wrong about Kofi and Evan their both figures are unique, much like Big SHow's. OMg stupid Mattel i thought each figure was going to be different... and why the fuk are they already releasing the same figures... two batistas? two cenas? i thought they would incorporate the whole roster before rereleasing the same fukn figures....omg ...........
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of Lime Green Jello! on Oct 30, 2009 4:51:46 GMT -5
Lol yeah right, look at the Batista, Triple H and Cena, they all have the same torso, and the HHH/Batista molds are pretty much the exact same, minus the boots. Even Kofi and Bourne's torso's are both the same. I'd be willing to bet money that each wrestler don't get their own torso either. Wow you're right about all three having the same torso but you're wrong about Kofi and Evan their both figures are unique, much like Big SHow's. OMg stupid Mattel i thought each figure was going to be different... and why the fuk are they already releasing the same figures... two batistas? two cenas? i thought they would incorporate the whole roster before rereleasing the same fukn figures....omg ........... The Kofi and Bourne torsos are exactly the same, look closer.
|
|
MVH
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 8, 2008 22:28:38 GMT -5
Posts: 2,597
|
Post by MVH on Oct 30, 2009 7:43:17 GMT -5
interesting to note that they changed DiBiase's wrist tape to black
|
|
peterjp2
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
24 ref's and counting, 944 on eBay
Joined on: Feb 8, 2006 10:18:07 GMT -5
Posts: 1,734
|
Post by peterjp2 on Oct 30, 2009 17:45:38 GMT -5
Not bad for the first waves. Bring on Randy Orton and Mickie James.
|
|
hitman1072
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 9, 2005 1:43:07 GMT -5
Posts: 1,495
|
Post by hitman1072 on Oct 31, 2009 2:26:18 GMT -5
That might be true...but the main problem with Jakks wasn't body reuse, it was that the bodies sucked. They were more realistic than Mattel's body molds. No...they really weren't. Jakks has made terrible figures. The best things they ever did only turned out decent. Most everything else was very mediocre to awful.
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of Lime Green Jello! on Oct 31, 2009 2:57:32 GMT -5
They were more realistic than Mattel's body molds. No...they really weren't. Jakks has made terrible figures. The best things they ever did only turned out decent. Most everything else was very mediocre to awful. I'll admit Jakks do exaggerate some of the physiques on some of their figures but Mattel's versions of HHH, Cena and Batista is laughable. The Mattel figure line is horrible, maybe it'll increase over time but for now, even a Jakks figure with missing detail are better than these.
|
|
hitman1072
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 9, 2005 1:43:07 GMT -5
Posts: 1,495
|
Post by hitman1072 on Oct 31, 2009 10:29:18 GMT -5
No...they really weren't. Jakks has made terrible figures. The best things they ever did only turned out decent. Most everything else was very mediocre to awful. I'll admit Jakks do exaggerate some of the physiques on some of their figures but Mattel's versions of HHH, Cena and Batista is laughable. The Mattel figure line is horrible, maybe it'll increase over time but for now, even a Jakks figure with missing detail are better than these. No...again you are wrong. Jakks' versions are pathetic. Have you seen the latest John Cena figures? Why did they make it a bobblehead? I don't want a Cena bobblehead...I want a Cena action figure. Also...why does nearly every Triple H have Brock Lesnar's torso? How about the TRU exclusive Triple H from WM 22? Can you honestly say it compares to Mattel's Triple H Entrance Greats? It is silly to even debate this with you. It's like comparing the nicest areas of San Diego to any part of Gary, IN. Jakks in this case would be Gary, IN.
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of Lime Green Jello! on Oct 31, 2009 17:17:01 GMT -5
I'll admit Jakks do exaggerate some of the physiques on some of their figures but Mattel's versions of HHH, Cena and Batista is laughable. The Mattel figure line is horrible, maybe it'll increase over time but for now, even a Jakks figure with missing detail are better than these. No...again you are wrong. Jakks' versions are pathetic. Have you seen the latest John Cena figures? Why did they make it a bobblehead? I don't want a Cena bobblehead...I want a Cena action figure. Also...why does nearly every Triple H have Brock Lesnar's torso? How about the TRU exclusive Triple H from WM 22? Can you honestly say it compares to Mattel's Triple H Entrance Greats? It is silly to even debate this with you. It's like comparing the nicest areas of San Diego to any part of Gary, IN. Jakks in this case would be Gary, IN. You're in no position to be talking about Triple H torsos when you like the Mattel version. The TRU exclusive was fine for what it was, everyone should know that you're not going to get Hot Toys quality when buying from Jakks, and if you're not going to get it from Jakks then you're sure as hell not going to get it from Mattel. By the sounds of things, you're judging the entire Jakks line based off the last couple of months, kinda pathetic actually.
|
|
|
Post by Next Manufactured’s Sweater on Oct 31, 2009 17:57:45 GMT -5
Although, if you were giving a 1 out of 10 for Flex Force, then I could 100% agree with that, although, we all have to remember, that's the kids line anyways so they're not catered for to us. And strangely enough, they're the closest we've had to Hasbros in over ten years (since Slammers) so kev85hasbro probably likes them best out of Mattel's line.
|
|
hitman1072
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 9, 2005 1:43:07 GMT -5
Posts: 1,495
|
Post by hitman1072 on Oct 31, 2009 23:06:45 GMT -5
No...again you are wrong. Jakks' versions are pathetic. Have you seen the latest John Cena figures? Why did they make it a bobblehead? I don't want a Cena bobblehead...I want a Cena action figure. Also...why does nearly every Triple H have Brock Lesnar's torso? How about the TRU exclusive Triple H from WM 22? Can you honestly say it compares to Mattel's Triple H Entrance Greats? It is silly to even debate this with you. It's like comparing the nicest areas of San Diego to any part of Gary, IN. Jakks in this case would be Gary, IN. You're in no position to be talking about Triple H torsos when you like the Mattel version. The TRU exclusive was fine for what it was, everyone should know that you're not going to get Hot Toys quality when buying from Jakks, and if you're not going to get it from Jakks then you're sure as hell not going to get it from Mattel. By the sounds of things, you're judging the entire Jakks line based off the last couple of months, kinda pathetic actually. Sure I am in that position. The Mattel Triple H looks far better. The TRU exclusive was sh*t. Garbage. I don't get that statement. If we aren't going to get it from Jakks...we won't get it from Mattel? How can you even compare the 2 companies? Jakks has never put out anything great or even remotely good. The DCUC line put out by Mattel blows anything Jakks has ever or will ever do completely out of the water. The WWE product will continue this starting on 1/1/10. No...again you are wrong. I am basing it on the product Jakks has produced since 1996. It has been absolutely mediocre to poor at best. Now I am wondering...why are you even here? You've said you will not collect Mattel WWE. You have said that in your terribly boring posts over and over...and over. We got it. You don't like Mattel, yet you keep posting on a board regarding figures you will never buy according to you. That my friend is truly pathetic.
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of Lime Green Jello! on Oct 31, 2009 23:13:17 GMT -5
You're in no position to be talking about Triple H torsos when you like the Mattel version. The TRU exclusive was fine for what it was, everyone should know that you're not going to get Hot Toys quality when buying from Jakks, and if you're not going to get it from Jakks then you're sure as hell not going to get it from Mattel. By the sounds of things, you're judging the entire Jakks line based off the last couple of months, kinda pathetic actually. Sure I am in that position. The Mattel Triple H looks far better. The TRU exclusive was sh*t. Garbage. I don't get that statement. If we aren't going to get it from Jakks...we won't get it from Mattel? How can you even compare the 2 companies? Jakks has never put out anything great or even remotely good. The DCUC line put out by Mattel blows anything Jakks has ever or will ever do completely out of the water. The WWE product will continue this starting on 1/1/10. No...again you are wrong. I am basing it on the product Jakks has produced since 1996. It has been absolutely mediocre to poor at best. Now I am wondering...why are you even here? You've said you will not collect Mattel WWE. You have said that in your terribly boring posts over and over...and over. We got it. You don't like Mattel, yet you keep posting on a board regarding figures you will never buy according to you. That my friend is truly pathetic. The Mattel Triple H only looks better because of the attire it comes with, in which case, that aspect is better than Jakks. You're expecting far too much from Jakks, like I said, you're not going to get Hot Toys quality figures from them, and definitely not Mattel, as shown by the protos. So you've never bought a WWE figure ever? This is a forum where users can give opinions about certain things, if theres something I don't like then I can say I don't like it, the point of it being a forum. And I've said before, I might pick up an Entrance Great or two so there goes that comment of yours. In the end though, its all opinion, you have yours and I have mine, you prefer Mattel, I prefer Jakks.
|
|
hitman1072
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 9, 2005 1:43:07 GMT -5
Posts: 1,495
|
Post by hitman1072 on Nov 1, 2009 16:24:42 GMT -5
Sure I am in that position. The Mattel Triple H looks far better. The TRU exclusive was sh*t. Garbage. I don't get that statement. If we aren't going to get it from Jakks...we won't get it from Mattel? How can you even compare the 2 companies? Jakks has never put out anything great or even remotely good. The DCUC line put out by Mattel blows anything Jakks has ever or will ever do completely out of the water. The WWE product will continue this starting on 1/1/10. No...again you are wrong. I am basing it on the product Jakks has produced since 1996. It has been absolutely mediocre to poor at best. Now I am wondering...why are you even here? You've said you will not collect Mattel WWE. You have said that in your terribly boring posts over and over...and over. We got it. You don't like Mattel, yet you keep posting on a board regarding figures you will never buy according to you. That my friend is truly pathetic. The Mattel Triple H only looks better because of the attire it comes with, in which case, that aspect is better than Jakks. You're expecting far too much from Jakks, like I said, you're not going to get Hot Toys quality figures from them, and definitely not Mattel, as shown by the protos. So you've never bought a WWE figure ever? This is a forum where users can give opinions about certain things, if theres something I don't like then I can say I don't like it, the point of it being a forum. And I've said before, I might pick up an Entrance Great or two so there goes that comment of yours. In the end though, its all opinion, you have yours and I have mine, you prefer Mattel, I prefer Jakks. In that case...you just have terrible taste in what you collect. It is just that simple.
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of Lime Green Jello! on Nov 2, 2009 1:45:50 GMT -5
The Mattel Triple H only looks better because of the attire it comes with, in which case, that aspect is better than Jakks. You're expecting far too much from Jakks, like I said, you're not going to get Hot Toys quality figures from them, and definitely not Mattel, as shown by the protos. So you've never bought a WWE figure ever? This is a forum where users can give opinions about certain things, if theres something I don't like then I can say I don't like it, the point of it being a forum. And I've said before, I might pick up an Entrance Great or two so there goes that comment of yours. In the end though, its all opinion, you have yours and I have mine, you prefer Mattel, I prefer Jakks. In that case...you just have terrible taste in what you collect. It is just that simple. Lol at the irony. Out of curiousity, can you not handle it when other peoples opinion is different from yours? You seem rather defensive whenever someone has the slightest negative thing to say about these excuses for action figures.
|
|