Oklahomie
Superstar
Nope.
Joined on: May 6, 2007 11:50:44 GMT -5
Posts: 758
|
Post by Oklahomie on Aug 13, 2007 10:31:58 GMT -5
WOOO ANGLE HAS THE WHOLE FEDERATION!  YEAH!!! SCREW YOU TNA HOME GROWN STARS! Well,Time 2 Get The Rope And Hook  You TNA!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Aug 13, 2007 11:25:56 GMT -5
TNA is setting up Joe winning for BFG. It's the biggest show of the year for TNA, it will mean more. Honestly, what would you prefer Joe winning tonight, or at BFG? Everybody was saying the same thing last year, did it happen? |
|
|
|
Post by kurtangleisgod on Aug 13, 2007 12:05:43 GMT -5
Having all the belts on Joe would be just as bad in my opinion, not because of who he is, but the general idea sucks. I like angle more, because he is one of my all tiem favorites, so I marked when he won the match, but here is how I see this going, one of two ways:
-Cornette is pissed about the screwjob, and puts Joe into the No Surrender, making it a triple threat, where anyone can win, and if Angle retains, then he can pinn Abyss, so Joe at least doesn't do the job, and maybe set up for Joe/Angle V at Bound For Glory, where joe finally wins.
OR
- On the impacts leadign to No Surrender, Joe costs Angle the tag and X titles, and then Angle loses the IWGP title overseas. Joe tries to screw Angle at No Surrender, but Angle manages to fight hiim off. Bound For Glory is Joe/Angle V, world title, with joe going over.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Aug 13, 2007 12:30:37 GMT -5
why does joe have the tag titles wtf ... does "The match of champions" ring any bells?... no whats that |
|
|
|
Post by comebackkid on Aug 13, 2007 12:43:56 GMT -5
 TNA: WE ARE WRESTLING |
|
|
|
Post by Mr. McCluer on Aug 13, 2007 12:55:35 GMT -5
F this crap, Samoa Joe deserves to be champion finally, they ahve really dropped the ball with him, forget tna, they suck now,
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Aug 13, 2007 14:53:30 GMT -5
F this crap, Samoa Joe deserves to be champion finally, they ahve really dropped the ball with him, forget tna, they suck now, angle has more cred thus more reason to have all the belts. he's been built as the guy whose done it all...why not just wiat till its down to one title again and have Joe win it. Works for me |
|
|
|
Post by reecechillin on Aug 13, 2007 16:11:38 GMT -5
i hope angle gets all the belts off him quickly it sucks with it like this
BFG will suck if there isnt 3 different title matches
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Aug 13, 2007 17:06:29 GMT -5
i hope angle gets all the belts off him quickly it sucks with it like this BFG will suck if there isnt 3 different title matches TNA accomplished there purpose. to set Kurt Angle up as the only man ever to hold all the belts in the company...there's no way he keeps them all. I predict after bound for glory he has none left  |
|
|
|
Post by comebackkid on Aug 13, 2007 17:08:40 GMT -5
i hope angle gets all the belts off him quickly it sucks with it like this BFG will suck if there isnt 3 different title matches TNA accomplished there purpose. to set Kurt Angle up as the only man ever to hold all the belts in the company...there's no way he keeps them all. I predict after bound for glory he has none left AJ Styles did already just not in this stupid fashion nice try making sense of idiocy |
|
|
|
Post by wwemark1 on Aug 13, 2007 17:27:44 GMT -5
TNA accomplished there purpose. to set Kurt Angle up as the only man ever to hold all the belts in the company...there's no way he keeps them all. I predict after bound for glory he has none left AJ Styles did already just not in this stupid fashion nice try making sense of idiocy That pisses me off to. It took away from Styles' Triple Crown wins. |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Aug 13, 2007 17:34:04 GMT -5
When did styles hold all thre titles at the same time?
|
|
|
|
Post by j2dacversion3 on Aug 13, 2007 17:40:24 GMT -5
When did styles hold all thre titles at the same time? He's the only man to hold all three seperately. |
|
|
|
Post by wwemark1 on Aug 13, 2007 17:45:52 GMT -5
When did styles hold all thre titles at the same time? A triple crown means you've held all the titles. It doesn't mean you held them all at the same time (like Kurt). |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Aug 13, 2007 17:47:11 GMT -5
When did styles hold all thre titles at the same time? He's the only man to hold all three seperately. thank you. exactly my point. Angle is different. He's the only, as Joe puts it unilateral champion. Styles was the first but not only triple crown champion. Angle joins him now and personally is a much greater accomplishment. technically you could say Kurt is the standard becasue Styles titles were NWA. Thanks SG, I know what the Triple crown is,,,expalin that to Clemens  |
|
|
|
Post by comebackkid on Aug 13, 2007 17:47:40 GMT -5
AJ's was actually impressive since the title meant alot more then as opposed to now
|
|
|
|
Post by wwemark1 on Aug 13, 2007 17:50:16 GMT -5
AJ's was actually impressive since the title meant alot more then as opposed to now Exactly. Styles also beat diffrent people to win the X/Tag/World unlike Kurt & it came off better because Kurt has been champions before in big company (WWE) but this was Styles' first times winning these titles in a "big" compnay in TNA. |
|
|
|
Post by wwemark1 on Aug 13, 2007 17:52:25 GMT -5
He's the only man to hold all three seperately. thank you. exactly my point. Angle is different. He's the only, as Joe puts it unilateral champion. Styles was the first but not only triple crown champion. Angle joins him now and personally is a much greater accomplishment. technically you could say Kurt is the standard becasue Styles titles were NWA. Thanks SG, I know what the Triple crown is,,,expalin that to Clemens He knows what it means.. you obviously don't. A triple crown winner means you have held ALL the titles in that one promotion you can hold regardless if it's diffrent times OR at the same exact time. |
|
|
|
Post by comebackkid on Aug 13, 2007 17:57:04 GMT -5
thank you. exactly my point. Angle is different. He's the only, as Joe puts it unilateral champion. Styles was the first but not only triple crown champion. Angle joins him now and personally is a much greater accomplishment. technically you could say Kurt is the standard becasue Styles titles were NWA. Thanks SG, I know what the Triple crown is,,,expalin that to Clemens He knows what it means.. you obviously don't. A triple crown winner means you have held ALL the titles in that one promotion you can hold regardless if it's diffrent times OR at the same exact time. Kool-Aid does that, your brain refuses to accept the idiocy of the things you worship. |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Aug 13, 2007 18:12:34 GMT -5
thank you. exactly my point. Angle is different. He's the only, as Joe puts it unilateral champion. Styles was the first but not only triple crown champion. Angle joins him now and personally is a much greater accomplishment. technically you could say Kurt is the standard becasue Styles titles were NWA. Thanks SG, I know what the Triple crown is,,,expalin that to Clemens He knows what it means.. you obviously don't. A triple crown winner means you have held ALL the titles in that one promotion you can hold regardless if it's diffrent times OR at the same exact time. Why do you assume I dont know that. I didnt say anything about not knowing that...You and him were the ones that chimed in about the triple crown thing...I never mentioned that...I was talking about all at the same time. Guess I shoulda made that clear in the beginning but I assumed that people would know what I'm talking about seeing as how Kurt has all the titles at once. forgive me for assuming you two would be able to understand that and not try to make an issue over it. |
|
