Post by Biff Slamkovich™ on Jan 2, 2010 15:25:59 GMT -5
This is not a joke topic, I just wanted to bring something odd to the boards attention, but here goes.
Many people on the boards here are still reviewing their figures and noticing the differences between Jakks' products and Mattels products. This includes things like the painting of hair, body molds, knee and elbow padding, head sculpts, skin tone, ect.
However, I've just noticed a very obscure and random thing about ALL of the Mattel figures that have been released thus far that set them apart from Jakks figures.
NONE of them have any nipples! Mattel did a great job creating different sized chest molds and body sculpts, as most are very defined and realistic. However, the lack of nipples is just hilarious to me. I'm guessing this was a conscious decision by Mattel considering most of their target consumers are of a younger audience, but I just find it weird.
I know this is completely random, but I'd like to hear some thoughts about this.
Many people on the boards here are still reviewing their figures and noticing the differences between Jakks' products and Mattels products. This includes things like the painting of hair, body molds, knee and elbow padding, head sculpts, skin tone, ect.
However, I've just noticed a very obscure and random thing about ALL of the Mattel figures that have been released thus far that set them apart from Jakks figures.
NONE of them have any nipples! Mattel did a great job creating different sized chest molds and body sculpts, as most are very defined and realistic. However, the lack of nipples is just hilarious to me. I'm guessing this was a conscious decision by Mattel considering most of their target consumers are of a younger audience, but I just find it weird.
I know this is completely random, but I'd like to hear some thoughts about this.
