|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on Jan 5, 2010 18:21:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy on Jan 5, 2010 18:22:18 GMT -5
That's an epic victory for TNA, Hogan's ridiculous claims be damned.
|
|
|
|
Post by moonlight on Jan 5, 2010 18:23:38 GMT -5
That's a good number a little higher then I expected it to be actually.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 5, 2010 18:24:27 GMT -5
Aren't they getting between a 1 and a 1.3.
I wouldn't call this a victory.
|
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Jan 5, 2010 18:24:27 GMT -5
Exactly what I predicted. I said they would get around a 1.5
|
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy on Jan 5, 2010 18:27:47 GMT -5
Aren't they getting between a 1 and a 1.3. I wouldn't call this a victory. To go up against RAW and retain your entire core base of an audience while adding another 50% is pretty damn good. Too bad the show completely sucked. |
|
kjw
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Jul 14, 2005 14:31:52 GMT -5
Posts: 279
|
Post by kjw on Jan 5, 2010 18:28:50 GMT -5
Hogan was only dreaming for a rating that high in the 3.0's.Too many old fogies were on and not enough of the younger wrestlers were on.There was just way too many of Hogan's friends on.And if Hogan plans to be on every week and make it the HUlk Hogan And Friends show than the ratings will go back down and in a hurry to a 0.9 rating.It doesn't take most fans to get very tired of Hogan and Company and very quickly too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Asia on Jan 5, 2010 18:31:07 GMT -5
i said 1.5 myself
|
|
|
|
Post by White Trash Lucha on Jan 5, 2010 18:31:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 5, 2010 18:33:06 GMT -5
Aren't they getting between a 1 and a 1.3. I wouldn't call this a victory. To go up against RAW and retain your entire core base of an audience while adding another 50% is pretty damn good. Too bad the show completely sucked. How is .2 50% of 1-1.3? When you go out and boast that you are getting a 3 and you only get half of that, it's an epic fail. I wish they'd break it down and show the ratings for the hours, to see if the first hour had a bigger rating when they were unopposed. |
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jan 5, 2010 18:33:47 GMT -5
I thought Hogan in TNA would make the ratings triple?
|
|
|
|
Post by bobsfedder on Jan 5, 2010 18:33:52 GMT -5
What was RAW's rating? Also how do they determine rating, by watchers?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy on Jan 5, 2010 18:34:31 GMT -5
To go up against RAW and retain your entire core base of an audience while adding another 50% is pretty damn good. Too bad the show completely sucked. How is .2 50% of 1-1.3? When you go out and boast that you are getting a 3 and you only get half of that, it's an epic fail. They haven't hit 1.3 in a while and it's fallen back to 1 ever since Bound for Glory. I was going by that. |
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy on Jan 5, 2010 18:35:51 GMT -5
TNA SPIKE TV’S “TNA iMPACT” DELIVERS ITS HIGHEST RATINGS EVER FOR HULK HOGAN’S DEBUT IN SPECIAL LIVE EPISODE
2.2 Million Tune-In For Live Three-Hour Telecast
New York, NY, January 5, 2010 – Hulk Hogan’s first appearance on Spike TV’s special three-hour live “TNA iMPACT” on Monday, January 2 (8:00-11:05pm) drew 2.2 million viewers. This marks the most-watched "TNA iMPACT" in the history of the franchise, totaling 222 episodes dating back to October, 2005. The previous high was 1.97 million viewers reached last April
The event was broadcast from the TNA iMPACT! Zone at Universal Studios in Orlando, Fl. Airing head-to-head with WWE on USA Network, “TNA iMPACT” peaked at 2.9 million viewers from 9:00-9:15pm ET/PT.
Overall, the telecast drew a 1.5 household rating, a 1.8 in Men 18-34, and a 1.6 in Men 18-49. For the time period, “TNA iMPACT” was up a whopping +338% in M18-34, +241% in M18-49, and +84% in average audience versus a year ago.
|
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jan 5, 2010 18:42:25 GMT -5
Success!
|
|
|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on Jan 5, 2010 18:42:46 GMT -5
Early ratings: RAW averaged 5.60 million viewers, Impact averaged 2.20 million viewers.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 5, 2010 18:43:07 GMT -5
How is half of what they said they were going to get a success? |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jan 5, 2010 18:44:09 GMT -5
How is half of what they said they were going to get a success? Hogan said 3.0, not TNA. Hogan. There's a diffrence. Also, if you dn't call this a sucess, you're blind. TNA goes up against RAW and gets a BIGGER number than usual. It is a sucess. |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jan 5, 2010 18:44:34 GMT -5
TNA SPIKE TV’S “TNA iMPACT” DELIVERS ITS HIGHEST RATINGS EVER FOR HULK HOGAN’S DEBUT IN SPECIAL LIVE EPISODE 2.2 Million Tune-In For Live Three-Hour Telecast New York, NY, January 5, 2010 – Hulk Hogan’s first appearance on Spike TV’s special three-hour live “TNA iMPACT” on Monday, January 2 (8:00-11:05pm) drew 2.2 million viewers. This marks the most-watched "TNA iMPACT" in the history of the franchise, totaling 222 episodes dating back to October, 2005. The previous high was 1.97 million viewers reached last April The event was broadcast from the TNA iMPACT! Zone at Universal Studios in Orlando, Fl. Airing head-to-head with WWE on USA Network, “TNA iMPACT” peaked at 2.9 million viewers from 9:00-9:15pm ET/PT. Overall, the telecast drew a 1.5 household rating, a 1.8 in Men 18-34, and a 1.6 in Men 18-49. For the time period, “TNA iMPACT” was up a whopping +338% in M18-34, +241% in M18-49, and +84% in average audience versus a year ago. oh gawd, we'll never hear the end of this  ..we'll see how soon this dips t0 1.0 again |
|
June
Main Eventer
High Fives All Around!!!
Joined on: May 31, 2009 10:54:49 GMT -5
Posts: 4,457
|
Post by June on Jan 5, 2010 18:45:13 GMT -5
Great news. TNA put on a better show, they re-introduced familiar names while also showcasing their homegrown talent. RAW with the exception of Bret Hart was the same ol' same ol'.
|
|
