Deleted
Joined on: Nov 29, 2024 23:28:07 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2010 19:01:58 GMT -5
I just can't take the 6-sided ring seriously. It seemed like a gimmick when they first did it, and I'm just too old-school to get used to it. Just show me good wrestling done by compelling personalities instead of goofy gimmicks and I'm happy. I don't need 6-sided rings, burning ropes, mega-super-duper electrified cage of doom (with a shark moat) matches, or anything like that. I am, of course, aware that my day has come and gone when it comes to wrestling.
|
|
|
|
Post by mnm213 on Jan 6, 2010 19:12:05 GMT -5
6. It sets TNA apart from the other companies and it just looks cool IMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Jan 7, 2010 12:33:54 GMT -5
As much as I respect the 6 Sided Ring, and what it does for TNA in terms of Identity, but I think for it to match the WWE it needs to go back to the 4 Sided Ring.
|
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Jan 7, 2010 12:44:28 GMT -5
The thing about the six-sided ring is that TNA has done nothing with it that they couldn't do with a four-sided ring. It's there purely for the sake of being different, and offers no functional benefit.
I voted for the squared circle.
|
|
Infinite
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 27, 2009 13:49:36 GMT -5
Posts: 2,608
|
Post by Infinite on Jan 7, 2010 13:06:18 GMT -5
to be honest, i sorta like both. the 4 sided ring does feel right, but the 6 sided ring is tna trademark. some people miss the point though. the classic 4 sided isnt what is needed to look more proffessional, a helluva lot more is needed for that.
|
|
|
|
Post by BulletV1 on Jan 7, 2010 13:07:49 GMT -5
Do you all seriously think the number of sides a ring has is gonna effect their ratings, any in noticeable way?
|
|
KRAYZIE BONE
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
Visual.Avenues
Joined on: Jul 20, 2003 22:29:25 GMT -5
Posts: 1,608
|
Post by KRAYZIE BONE on Jan 7, 2010 20:11:47 GMT -5
4 sided.
6 sides is not different or unique considering its been done already.
|
|
