|
Post by BØRNS on Jan 10, 2010 0:29:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Jan 10, 2010 0:31:35 GMT -5
Yeah, you just might be. I haven't seen anybody else with it yet. Nice find!!
|
|
|
Post by skullmaniac1990 on Jan 10, 2010 0:33:17 GMT -5
Nice! I haven't seen that Evan Bourne anywhere. When I saw it on WWE.com as a background I thought maybe it was a future release.
|
|
|
Post by BuckDenaro7: Elite Trader on Jan 10, 2010 0:33:51 GMT -5
nice figure, me being a bourne completionist thus far, i may get it
|
|
DKR
Main Eventer
It's all good...
Joined on: Feb 13, 2008 13:23:53 GMT -5
Posts: 3,916
|
Post by DKR on Jan 10, 2010 0:39:53 GMT -5
Nice man, where did you get it?
|
|
|
Post by BØRNS on Jan 10, 2010 0:42:11 GMT -5
Nice man, where did you get it? I found it at Wal Mart. I also live in California.
|
|
|
Post by MC2 on Jan 10, 2010 0:53:54 GMT -5
It looks like basic style?
|
|
DKR
Main Eventer
It's all good...
Joined on: Feb 13, 2008 13:23:53 GMT -5
Posts: 3,916
|
Post by DKR on Jan 10, 2010 0:58:08 GMT -5
It looks like basic style? He clearly stated it was a Flex Force about 13 times in his post...
|
|
|
Post by BØRNS on Jan 10, 2010 0:59:56 GMT -5
It looks like basic style? Yeah, it's in scale with Basic and looks Basic except the arms don't have the ball shoulder joint, the torso doesn't move side to side, the legs don't move forward, the wrists don't go up and down, and the feet don't move. Don't get me wrong, because what it lacks in articulation, the detail and leg FF action makes up for it.
|
|
|
Post by Dan88 on Jan 10, 2010 1:02:01 GMT -5
Nice find, even without all the articulation he details still make it nicer than the jakks bourne.
|
|
|
Post by cobraviper81 on Jan 10, 2010 1:13:14 GMT -5
awesome! i haven't seen that yet!
|
|
|
Post by BigDaddyChacon on Jan 10, 2010 2:12:21 GMT -5
Awesome find!!! Congrats.
|
|
|
Post by Raoul the Great on Jan 10, 2010 3:44:20 GMT -5
It looks good, but I doubt I would buy it because of the action feature.
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Jan 10, 2010 4:54:48 GMT -5
Wasnt that shown on wwe.com in their mattel celebration or sometthing? I missed it but read it was. Either way it looks fantastic and would certainly qualify for throwing away RA39 bourne. Its shorter, better scan, better deco, heck its got the molds and everything.
|
|
|
Post by divafan30 on Jan 10, 2010 5:09:20 GMT -5
I really Don't like flex force But that Bourne looks awesome the color of the pants looks better than the basics one
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Jan 10, 2010 5:15:40 GMT -5
Cool find that I have never seen before. I actually went to Target today but again had bad luck. I need to go buy a lucky rabbit foot or something.
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Jan 10, 2010 6:05:30 GMT -5
Very cool. must be FlexForce Series 2. Do you know who else was in the set? Also are his arms able to be straightened out? and put down at his side?
|
|
richversion1
Superstar
Devourer of Worlds
Joined on: May 1, 2007 4:53:32 GMT -5
Posts: 680
|
Post by richversion1 on Jan 10, 2010 6:39:12 GMT -5
Flex Force isn't my cup of tea but that looks really cool, i'd have to pick it up if I see itin stores, good pick up....
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jan 10, 2010 7:35:45 GMT -5
What? Nice. havent seen one yet
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Jan 10, 2010 9:42:39 GMT -5
It looks like basic style? He clearly stated it was a Flex Force about 13 times in his post... He said it LOOKS like a Basic style , and it really does.
|
|