|
Post by No Brokeback on Mar 17, 2010 5:34:53 GMT -5
I'd rather watch TNA fail with decent wrestling television than WWE succeed with the same crap put on my TV, all of which feels and has felt empty and pointless for the last 5 years.
|
|
orpheous
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 6, 2010 21:06:59 GMT -5
Posts: 1,406
|
Post by orpheous on Mar 17, 2010 12:21:43 GMT -5
hopefully the ratings get better... the shows are getting better...but I do feel maybe they should have waited until AFTER wrestlemania for the monday switch
|
|
|
Post by mdf2349 on Mar 17, 2010 12:59:14 GMT -5
hopefully the ratings get better... the shows are getting better...but I do feel maybe they should have waited until AFTER wrestlemania for the monday switch them getting ratings they are getting for the past two weeks has nothing to do with wrestlemania the reason the rattings are so bad for the past two weeks has to do with the fact of them not beeing as well know as wwe and people just don't wanna stray from Vinnie Mac. and along with spike tv doing a horrible job of promting the move to monday nights Seriously the smart move for tna would have been going live on Thursdays untill they started carving out a niche and than thinking about moving to mondays
|
|
|
Post by juicewinslow on Mar 17, 2010 13:12:12 GMT -5
hopefully the ratings get better... the shows are getting better...but I do feel maybe they should have waited until AFTER wrestlemania for the monday switch If they did that, they would have started out Mondays not only competing with WWE but Monday Night Football as well.
|
|
|
Post by jfinnomore on Mar 17, 2010 19:26:36 GMT -5
hopefully the ratings get better... the shows are getting better...but I do feel maybe they should have waited until AFTER wrestlemania for the monday switch If they did that, they would have started out Mondays not only competing with WWE but Monday Night Football as well. huh? theres 5 months between Mania and the start of the NFL season so they'd have plenty of time to gain momentum before they had to compete with both.
|
|
|
Post by cmpunk09 on Mar 18, 2010 19:52:24 GMT -5
This is just deplorable for TNA. They should stay on Thursdays with ratings like this. And this is coming from a huge TNA fan.
|
|
|
Post by THE *Legendary* STINGER on Mar 18, 2010 20:23:19 GMT -5
the went up against AUSTIN as the guest host.. even a huge fan like myself tuned into RAW that night.
|
|
|
Post by Byron F'N Saxton Fan on Mar 19, 2010 14:46:22 GMT -5
A fan asked Eric Bischoff the following question on his Facebook page: Why aren't you commenting on your thoughts on this week's ratings. They weren't better but I think everyone would like to hear what you think. Bischoff replied with this: Markus...you need to get a life.
-WZROnline.com
I'm sure Markus would have had a life if TNA got a 1.1 or 1.2.
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Mar 19, 2010 14:53:23 GMT -5
A fan asked Eric Bischoff the following question on his Facebook page: Why aren't you commenting on your thoughts on this week's ratings. They weren't better but I think everyone would like to hear what you think. Bischoff replied with this: Markus...you need to get a life. - WZROnline.comI'm sure Markus would have had a life if TNA got a 1.1 or 1.2. lmao
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 13:52:10 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2010 22:26:52 GMT -5
Last night's replay of the March 15 TNA Impact episode averaged 1.16 million viewers, which was more than the number of viewers for the first-run airing on Monday night opposite WWE Raw. Monday's airing drew 1.10 million viewers and scored a 0.84 TV rating, which was the lowest rating since November 2006. credit pwtorch ----------------------------------------------------------------- Wake Up TNA!
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Mar 19, 2010 22:56:57 GMT -5
TNA's getting better numbers than they are going up against RAW?
REALLY? Of course they are, TNA knows it's not going to be two weeks of a turn around.
|
|
hbkrules
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
Joined on: Jun 18, 2002 11:49:32 GMT -5
Posts: 2,115
|
Post by hbkrules on Mar 20, 2010 0:44:06 GMT -5
If they don't change time slots they are crazy. Clearly this is a sizable audience for tna now considering over 2 million people watched impact at some point this week. They need to get in a time slot where everyone can watch. If they ever start getting 3.0s then consider going head to head with raw
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 20, 2010 1:26:14 GMT -5
If they don't change time slots they are crazy. Clearly this is a sizable audience for tna now considering over 2 million people watched impact at some point this week. They need to get in a time slot where everyone can watch. If they ever start getting 3.0s then consider going head to head with raw You really think that everyone that watched on Thursday didn't watch it on Monday, so that it's over 2 million watching? I doubt every single one of those viewers on Thursday didn't watch on Monday. And if what you are saying is the case, then where were these 2 million people when they could only catch it on Thursdays? They won't be getting 3's while going up against Raw. And if they couldn't do it for these past years they've been on TV, I don't think that all of a sudden millions more people are going to start watching TNA.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Mar 20, 2010 2:22:59 GMT -5
A fan asked Eric Bischoff the following question on his Facebook page: Why aren't you commenting on your thoughts on this week's ratings. They weren't better but I think everyone would like to hear what you think. Bischoff replied with this: Markus...you need to get a life. - WZROnline.comI'm sure Markus would have had a life if TNA got a 1.1 or 1.2. he repliiieeed
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 13:52:10 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2010 3:11:19 GMT -5
Why you're all so fascinated with the ratings is beyond me, I mean can't you just enjoy that two main stream wrestling companies are going head to head every Monday and this is the first time in many years that this has happened? The only people who the ratings should really matter to are the TV networks and those who are a part of the wrestling company itself.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 13:52:10 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2010 12:14:35 GMT -5
It's not that anyone is fascinated by it, it's all just discussion. However, showing that the ratings have mostly DROPPED, is quite humorous.
Hogan thought they could give RAW a run for it's money, on Monday's. Yet ( for now ), they haven't really made any progress.
Hell, even the replay is doing better numbers. Which simply shows that wrestling fans would much rather watch RAW, than iMPACT! It shows that the formula TNA is using isn't quite working, to create any kind of "war". It's been said a million times ( including me ), TNA should have gone LIVE on Thursday's, rather than Monday's.
And SG, seriously man... don't act like the replay doing better DOESN'T bother Hogan and Bischoff. Don't act like their main objective isn't to beat RAW in the ratings. Wrestling fans care more about RAW, than iMPACT! and when forced to choose one... most have chosen RAW, clearly. Accept it, TNA made a bad decision of moving to Monday nights.
- Triple S
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Mar 20, 2010 12:17:35 GMT -5
Why you're all so fascinated with the ratings is beyond me, I mean can't you just enjoy that two main stream wrestling companies are going head to head every Monday and this is the first time in many years that this has happened? The only people who the ratings should really matter to are the TV networks and those who are a part of the wrestling company itself. Personally, I want TNA to succeed. But since they base their success on ratings it, it becomes an issue. If TNA and Hogan, Dixie, etc didn't clamor all the time about the importance of ratings and build so much stock in it then I'm sure most people wouldnt care. It's only an issue becasue TNA has made it an issue. As I've said before ratings does not equal quality. I think the thursday night replay showed that in full. 3 million people that tuned into Raw on Monday had a chance to watch impact on thursday...It appears that few if any did. So does that mean TNA's product was junk? imo it was the better show, but fans like what they like. It's like if their are two football teams playing...one on one channel i like and another one I hate on another channel. do you think im gonna watch the team I hate either time? probably not. If TNA would just focus on letting the workers work, and telling storylines then they would all but guarantee the same or better ratings. And the move to Mondays was them focusing on ratings again instead of their own product. they just need to make a show and stop worrying about the frukin ratings! this is not the 90's and there will never be another Monday night war. The best thing for them to do if they do care about ratings is to return to Thursday night, otherwise they need to stop focusing on it and just put a damn wrestling product out there.
|
|
|
Post by 3Lephant (Naptown Icon) on Mar 20, 2010 23:50:35 GMT -5
It's not that anyone is fascinated by it, it's all just discussion. However, showing that the ratings have mostly DROPPED, is quite humorous. Hogan thought they could give RAW a run for it's money, on Monday's. Yet ( for now ), they haven't really made any progress. Hell, even the replay is doing better numbers. Which simply shows that wrestling fans would much rather watch RAW, than iMPACT! It shows that the formula TNA is using isn't quite working, to create any kind of "war". It's been said a million times ( including me ), TNA should have gone LIVE on Thursday's, rather than Monday's. And SG, seriously man... don't act like the replay doing better DOESN'T bother Hogan and Bischoff. Don't act like their main objective isn't to beat RAW in the ratings. Wrestling fans care more about RAW, than iMPACT! and when forced to choose one... most have chosen RAW, clearly. Accept it, TNA made a bad decision of moving to Monday nights. - Triple S You know there has only been 2 shows right?
|
|
|
Post by The Mac on Mar 21, 2010 3:51:11 GMT -5
haha stupid Hogan
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 13:52:10 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2010 3:54:38 GMT -5
Yes, it's only been 2 shows. However, the first week was a decline of the normal Thursday ratings and this past week's did even worse than the first week.
If numbers don't start increasing to a solid 1.0 or more EACH week, they might as well go back to Thursdays. Where WWE fans could easily watch their program, rather than choosing RAW over it.
- Triple S
|
|