|
|
Post by spearjack24 on Jan 19, 2010 22:02:06 GMT -5
good win for republicans but im sure the Dems will try to push something in very quickly they are pretty Bipartisan right? About as bipartisan as the Republicans. The Republicans have a better record of being bi-partisan than the DEMONcrats do. I mean look at Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac, the Bailouts...ect. Repubs were roped into voting the way of the dems to try and work together for the common good, and what happens??? The DEMONcrats stab the 'Pubs in the back and blame ever thing on them! |
|
|
|
Post by spearjack24 on Jan 19, 2010 22:28:34 GMT -5
BROWN WINS!!! THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 19, 2010 22:33:17 GMT -5
BROWN WINS!!! THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN!!! Yeah, I already said he won, last page. Not new news any more. Do you blame them for voting against a shitty candidate? |
|
|
|
Post by spearjack24 on Jan 19, 2010 22:39:15 GMT -5
BROWN WINS!!! THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN!!! Yeah, I already said he won, last page. Not new news any more. Do you blame them for voting against a poopty candidate? No I don't. From what I have seen from her campaign; she is one of the dirtiest Dems (next to Teddy, and Obammy) to ever run. |
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Jan 19, 2010 23:05:12 GMT -5
Good for republicans. Sucks for the lady but the people obviously liked the guy more at least a majority.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Jan 19, 2010 23:07:37 GMT -5
your right im not gonna say your not , but Democrats in congress have been absolutly horrid recently Only because the Republicans have said they are going to oppose stuff no matter how great the deal was for them. Are Democrats to blame? Sure, they have some blame. But Republicans are the bigger problem as they don't want to work with Democrats, they just want to make sure nothing gets done. Not entirely true and you're smart enough to know that. When Bush was in office he was good at getting bi-partisan support for his agenda and pushing things true. Democrats are the ones who are refusing to work with anyone or make any concessions. They're in power now though so they don't have to make concessions. It's how the game is played. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 19, 2010 23:16:22 GMT -5
Only because the Republicans have said they are going to oppose stuff no matter how great the deal was for them. Are Democrats to blame? Sure, they have some blame. But Republicans are the bigger problem as they don't want to work with Democrats, they just want to make sure nothing gets done. Not entirely true and you're smart enough to know that. When Bush was in office he was good at getting bi-partisan support for his agenda and pushing things true. Democrats are the ones who are refusing to work with anyone or make any concessions. They're in power now though so they don't have to make concessions. It's how the game is played. When you have something called the Patriot Act and try to pass off those against it as Anti-Americans, they are going to want to cave so they can be seen as Pro-American. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 19, 2010 23:17:39 GMT -5
Yeah, I already said he won, last page. Not new news any more. Do you blame them for voting against a poopty candidate? No I don't. From what I have seen from her campaign; she is one of the dirtiest Dems (next to Teddy, and Obammy) to ever run. Yeah, they were really dirty. |
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Jan 19, 2010 23:22:57 GMT -5
Not entirely true and you're smart enough to know that. When Bush was in office he was good at getting bi-partisan support for his agenda and pushing things true. Democrats are the ones who are refusing to work with anyone or make any concessions. They're in power now though so they don't have to make concessions. It's how the game is played. When you have something called the Patriot Act and try to pass off those against it as Anti-Americans, they are going to want to cave so they can be seen as Pro-American. And when you have a young, idealistic, inexperienced President, you want to be hardline so his agenda doesn't pass and you can paint him as a failure. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 19, 2010 23:23:58 GMT -5
When you have something called the Patriot Act and try to pass off those against it as Anti-Americans, they are going to want to cave so they can be seen as Pro-American. And when you have a young, idealistic, inexperienced President, you want to be hardline so his agenda doesn't pass and you can paint him as a failure. Sounds about right. |
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Jan 19, 2010 23:28:23 GMT -5
It's politics as usual. So much for change in Washington. If Obama wanted change, he would make a bipartisan effort on stuff even though he doesn't have to. However, since he has a majority and doesn't have to make compromises, he doesn't do it. This is fine and good as it's how business is done in Washington, but it's no change.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 19, 2010 23:30:13 GMT -5
And the stuff he's wanted to change, he's backed off on.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 17:58:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2010 23:36:30 GMT -5
Well, looks like no healthcare for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Jan 19, 2010 23:37:13 GMT -5
And the stuff he's wanted to change, he's backed off on. Which, again, is typical politics. |
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Jan 19, 2010 23:37:52 GMT -5
Well, looks like no healthcare for me. Pay for it yourself like I do. Why should I be forced to pay for your healthcare? |
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Jan 19, 2010 23:56:50 GMT -5
Well, looks like no healthcare for me. Pay for it yourself like I do. Why should I be forced to pay for your healthcare? Because you love us. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 17:58:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2010 0:02:21 GMT -5
I want a Marxist in congress. I know that there's one socialist, but I'm talking about a full-fledged Marxist. It would be cool.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 17:58:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2010 0:31:26 GMT -5
Well, looks like no healthcare for me. Pay for it yourself like I do. Why should I be forced to pay for your healthcare? They won't tax you anymore than they already do, assuming we're all middle class here. Hopefully they tax lazy businessmen who sit behind desks with networths of a trillion dollars, underpaying their laborers. |
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Jan 20, 2010 11:49:13 GMT -5
Pay for it yourself like I do. Why should I be forced to pay for your healthcare? They won't tax you anymore than they already do, assuming we're all middle class here. Hopefully they tax lazy businessmen who sit behind desks with networths of a trillion dollars, underpaying their laborers. Yeah. Those guys don't work at all. They just woke up some day and discovered that they made a ton of money. We should punish them for that. How dare they just wake up one day and make tons of money. Bastards. |
|
|
|
Post by Mike Giggs' Munchies on Jan 20, 2010 15:37:54 GMT -5
They won't tax you anymore than they already do, assuming we're all middle class here. Hopefully they tax lazy businessmen who sit behind desks with networths of a trillion dollars, underpaying their laborers. Yeah. Those guys don't work at all. They just woke up some day and discovered that they made a ton of money. We should punish them for that. How dare they just wake up one day and make tons of money. Bastards. I love you  |
|
