Wuffles
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
Joined on: Jan 19, 2002 13:11:50 GMT -5
Posts: 4,976
|
Post by Wuffles on Feb 10, 2010 14:16:58 GMT -5
I personally think iot would be so over if they did this and Ted DiBiase sr. was in HBKs corner and paid to have Taker lay down and retire the streak WF would explode if that happened, haha. Now I want to see it  |
|
|
|
Post by JTG on Feb 10, 2010 14:26:28 GMT -5
I'm sure HBK/Taker II will be fantastic, but adding the World Championship this time around would make it that much more exciting to be honest. I hope The Undertaker keeps the belt going into Wrestlemania 26 and Edge takes on Sheamus for the WWE Championship.
|
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 10, 2010 15:01:14 GMT -5
I'm sure HBK/Taker II will be fantastic, but adding the World Championship this time around would make it that much more exciting to be honest. I hope The Undertaker keeps the belt going into Wrestlemania 26 and Edge takes on Sheamus for the WWE Championship. Shawn and Taker could still make exciting without the title. And Edge is facing Jericho at Mania . No sence of facing Sheamus |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 5:29:00 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2010 21:11:42 GMT -5
I was unaware that today was 5th Grade day on WF... But wait- don't you get this brilliant, high-wit humor? Instead of his third initial, he used a derogatory term for homosexuals. Get it? Because it rhymes with 'K'. It's uproariously good taste. Well done Sir - you just made my day!  |
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Feb 10, 2010 21:19:27 GMT -5
Nothing really new here but thanks for posting.
I want it to be Jericho as WHC v Edge and I guess it seems to only be heading to the Taker/HBK rematch..
|
|
|
|
Post by Calcifer Boheme on Feb 10, 2010 21:58:59 GMT -5
I don't think WWE has good enough writers to come up with a realistic scenario for Undertaker losing the title. The Undertaker should NEVER just be pinned clean. It should always be with heavy interference or like when they bury him or set him on fire or something. He's the Undertaker, you don't just PIN him. His character can summon lightning bolts to come down and fry your ass, he's not just going to let himself get pinned. That's why I hated when Kozlov just pinned him out of nowhere and then Triple H beat him in the EC last year. Undertaker should pretty much never lose just out of pure continuity. If he loses at the EC and then goes into "unbeatable mode" at Wrestlemania, it makes no sense because except for Jericho and MAYBE Punk everybody in the EC us a schlub. SO if he loses in the EC and then beats HBK who is a 100 times better at WM, it makes no sense why he would lose to lesser wrestlers a month earlier. Because he's gonna be facing 5 other opponents . If they all gang up on him , they can eliminate him. Or HBK can come in and distracted him This is what I was going to say... Also, I don't see why people say that Michaels can't lose two years in a row. Of course he can and in many ways it will be far more compelling if he does. The way he's been acting lately would make him losing the match a perfect continuation, especially if he's going to take time off. I would prefer he keep the belt, but if Jericho gets it and wrestles Edge, I'm ok with that too. |
|
Kenny Powers
Main Eventer
A.k.A Eddie Cash
Joined on: Feb 21, 2004 2:19:20 GMT -5
Posts: 2,527
|
Post by Kenny Powers on Feb 11, 2010 0:36:29 GMT -5
If they do Taker vs HBK II I would like to see a hell in a cell match. I think Jericho will win at the EC ppv and Edge will pick to face him at wm26
|
|
Hedgehulk
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 12, 2003 15:41:42 GMT -5
Posts: 1,856
|
Post by Hedgehulk on Feb 11, 2010 10:01:12 GMT -5
But wait- don't you get this brilliant, high-wit humor? Instead of his third initial, he used a derogatory term for homosexuals. Get it? Because it rhymes with 'K'. It's uproariously good taste. Well done Sir - you just made my day! Look guys, I want to appologize for the nickname I used to describe Shawn Micheals. I really meant no harm in it as I picked it up from an old RAW skit a number of years ago when Shawn was the commissioner of the WWE and was feuding with DX. DX brought Jason Sensation in to impersonate Micheals and Sensation referred to himself as HBGay. As I said, I didn't mean to offend anyone with my remarks. I should have taken the term into consideration before I used it. And although I stand in my response of the Micheals/Undertaker re-match, I will refrain from using such degrading terms on here out of respect for the other members of the board. Once again, I appologize. |
|
|
|
Post by wabarrett on Feb 11, 2010 11:21:54 GMT -5
Well done Sir - you just made my day! Look guys, I want to apologize for the nickname I used to describe Shawn Micheals. I really meant no harm in it as I picked it up from an old RAW skit a number of years ago when Shawn was the commissioner of the WWE and was feuding with DX. DX brought Jason Sensation in to impersonate Micheals and Sensation referred to himself as HBGay. As I said, I didn't mean to offend anyone with my remarks. I should have taken the term into consideration before I used it. And although I stand in my response of the Micheals/Undertaker re-match, I will refrain from using such degrading terms on here out of respect for the other members of the board. Once again, I apologize. People on here always get really heated whenever someone uses that kind of terminology. And don't forget, half of these guys never watched WWE back then, they just pretend they did, that's why they may have missed the references.  |
|
CMPunkSavior
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Feb 4, 2010 18:39:01 GMT -5
Posts: 495
|
Post by CMPunkSavior on Feb 11, 2010 13:47:29 GMT -5
Hell in a Cell will probably never happen again at WrestleMania. It would be better (or at least it was) to be put on another show like a Judgement Day. WrestleMania has drawing power in it's name alone.
|
|
