|
Post by CF9™ on Jun 20, 2010 17:17:32 GMT -5
All this freedom with tables made me want to break out Day of Reckoning 2. And I couldn't find it. .
|
|
|
Post by alexgg on Jun 20, 2010 17:39:55 GMT -5
As long as the table dosnt break when you put someone on it.
|
|
coog316
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 17, 2007 11:20:18 GMT -5
Posts: 1,193
|
Post by coog316 on Jun 20, 2010 18:20:52 GMT -5
table's look awesome this year!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 7, 2024 15:34:19 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2010 19:02:40 GMT -5
Watch that be one of the drawbacks to the new physics, you can't actually lay someone onto a table.
|
|
|
Post by OverTheEdge on Jun 20, 2010 21:06:11 GMT -5
Watch that be one of the drawbacks to the new physics, you can't actually lay someone onto a table. That would be incredibly ironic. I really do hope that's not the case though.
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Jun 20, 2010 21:18:57 GMT -5
Watch that be one of the drawbacks to the new physics, you can't actually lay someone onto a table. DAMMIT! Now you've said it, that's going to happen now.
|
|
|
Post by Old School NWA Fan on Jun 20, 2010 21:51:36 GMT -5
So pumped to use Sheamus now.......
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Jun 20, 2010 22:35:26 GMT -5
^ Because he just won the belt?
That makes me think:
Who does everyone think will be the starting champs:
Like -
WWE - Cena WHT - Swagger Womens - McCool
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Jun 20, 2010 23:02:46 GMT -5
^ Because he just won the belt? That makes me think: Who does everyone think will be the starting champs: Like - WWE - Cena WHT - Swagger Womens - McCool Womens Champ will be Layla as she won the title. At least I hope she makes it in.
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Jun 21, 2010 0:06:51 GMT -5
As long as the table dosnt break when you put someone on it. Unfortunately, i can see that being the reason why you cant lay people on tables anymore. They are designed to react upon ANY impact so im guessing putting them on would cause a normal collapse without actually performing a move. Oh oh, i hope this isnt the case....
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 7, 2024 15:34:19 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2010 0:26:19 GMT -5
^ Because he just won the belt? That makes me think: Who does everyone think will be the starting champs: Like - WWE - Cena WHT - Swagger Womens - McCool Womens Champ will be Layla as she won the title. At least I hope she makes it in. Not necessarily since last years default champions weren't updated after Judgment Day which took place in mid-May.
|
|
|
Post by Guy Incognito on Jun 21, 2010 0:29:18 GMT -5
Does it really matter who the starting champs are, we'll just be changing them anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hammers on Jun 21, 2010 1:25:17 GMT -5
As long as the table dosnt break when you put someone on it. Unfortunately, i can see that being the reason why you cant lay people on tables anymore. They are designed to react upon ANY impact so im guessing putting them on would cause a normal collapse without actually performing a move. Oh oh, i hope this isnt the case.... If Sabu is in the match, it would seem perfectly normal.
|
|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on Jun 21, 2010 1:33:03 GMT -5
I hope they made some new post-match celebrations. I'm tired of the same clips year after year after year of Undertaker and that terrible looking "tongue" sticking out of his mouth after every match he wins, or the fact that no matter what character you win the belt with they jump around like giddy teenager that just won the spelling bee.
|
|
|
Post by alexgg on Jun 21, 2010 3:14:56 GMT -5
They are the same in the demo, but I hope for the final product everyone has a after match celebration.
|
|
|
Post by OverTheEdge on Jun 21, 2010 5:01:37 GMT -5
As long as the table dosnt break when you put someone on it. Unfortunately, i can see that being the reason why you cant lay people on tables anymore. They are designed to react upon ANY impact so im guessing putting them on would cause a normal collapse without actually performing a move. Oh oh, i hope this isnt the case.... I really don't think that would be the case. I mean we can stack tables, so if we can do that without the table breaking/collapsing, I see no reason why we couldn't lay someone out on it.
|
|
|
Post by Elliot on Jun 21, 2010 5:56:05 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure they aren't that sensitive. We haven't seen nobody drag their opponent into a table yet, which in 2010 result in then been thrown into it read for a grapple. I'm pretty sure it's the same in 2011 with a grapple which places your opponent on it. They would be extremely stupid to remove such a feature.
|
|
|
Post by alexgg on Jun 21, 2010 6:07:00 GMT -5
I think they will lay on it in different positions, not just straight on. Still want to see if a normal finisher can go through a table, like if you stood near a table as Batista and Batista Bombed your opponment, can it target the table?
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Jun 21, 2010 6:09:20 GMT -5
Unfortunately, i can see that being the reason why you cant lay people on tables anymore. They are designed to react upon ANY impact so im guessing putting them on would cause a normal collapse without actually performing a move. Oh oh, i hope this isnt the case.... I really don't think that would be the case. I mean we can stack tables, so if we can do that without the table breaking/collapsing, I see no reason why we couldn't lay someone out on it. Thats true, all depends on how it works, surely they wont forget something so basic like putting people on a table but we'll see.
|
|
|
Post by Guy Incognito on Jun 21, 2010 6:22:38 GMT -5
I think we should be able to do all the same things we could do previously PLUS more.
Also, I think I've attended this thread enough to be a threadhead, so threadhead sig here I come.
|
|