|
Post by rkokixas on Mar 30, 2010 12:39:54 GMT -5
Heres a link to a funny vid of Orton from Axxess a few days ago.At about 3:40 he talks about Mr.kennedy/Anderson and shoots on him good.Pretty funny stuff.The vid link is
|
|
|
Post by thegenius on Mar 30, 2010 12:47:14 GMT -5
Ken > Orton. Couldn't care less what anybody says, Ken is more entertaining in TNA than Orton has been in about 6 years now. He also is
- Faster in the ring. - Better in the mic. - Better moveset. - Better looking. - Better actor. - Better character.
Of course, this is my opinion. And I'm not changing it, no matter who argues with me.
|
|
|
Post by ~*Young $ Money*~ on Mar 30, 2010 12:50:29 GMT -5
Ken > Orton. Couldn't care less what anybody says, Ken is more entertaining in TNA than Orton has been in about 6 years now. He also is - Faster in the ring. - Better in the mic. - Better moveset. - Better looking.- Better actor. - Better character. Of course, this is my opinion. And I'm not changing it, no matter who argues with me. Are you really serious? Kennedy looks like he has been sitting on a couch the past 3 years.
|
|
|
Post by ortonrko on Mar 30, 2010 12:51:46 GMT -5
Ken > Orton. Couldn't care less what anybody says, Ken is more entertaining in TNA than Orton has been in about 6 years now. He also is - Faster in the ring. - Better in the mic. - Better moveset. - Better looking. - Better actor. - Better character. Of course, this is my opinion. And I'm not changing it, no matter who argues with me. LOL! There's no changing your mind, is there! Cheers for the link, kixas
|
|
Jamal
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 24, 2005 14:53:44 GMT -5
Posts: 4,877
|
Post by Jamal on Mar 30, 2010 12:51:53 GMT -5
Ken > Orton. Couldn't care less what anybody says, Ken is more entertaining in TNA than Orton has been in about 6 years now. He also is - Faster in the ring. - Better in the mic. - Better moveset. - Better looking.- Better actor. - Better character. Of course, this is my opinion. And I'm not changing it, no matter who argues with me. And that makes him a better wrestler how?
|
|
|
Post by thegenius on Mar 30, 2010 12:52:20 GMT -5
Ken > Orton. Couldn't care less what anybody says, Ken is more entertaining in TNA than Orton has been in about 6 years now. He also is - Faster in the ring. - Better in the mic. - Better moveset. - Better looking.- Better actor. - Better character. Of course, this is my opinion. And I'm not changing it, no matter who argues with me. Are you really serious? Kennedy looks like he has been sitting on a couch the past 3 years. That's probably because he has? He hasn't been 100% active since 2007, till now really.
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Mar 30, 2010 12:53:58 GMT -5
Ken > Orton. Couldn't care less what anybody says, Ken is more entertaining in TNA than Orton has been in about 6 years now. He also is - Faster in the ring. - Better in the mic. - Better moveset. - Better looking. - Better actor. - Better character. Of course, this is my opinion. And I'm not changing it, no matter who argues with me.You say that every time like people are trying to, when they actaully don't. They say they don't like him, then you tell them they are wrong. I like Mr.Anderson as well, but you kinda put yourself into arguments once you get on the defensive when topics of him pop up. As for whose better, I say Orton. He has became super popular with the crowd this year, and him playing the Tweener (Yes, I think he is a tweener, not a face) is great. Like many have said, he has the same role as Austin had in the late 90's, he doesn't care who he faces or pairs with, he is in the match to win it. Anderson comes close but I need to see him in a decent feud in TNA. So far, all his done is talk about winning the TNA World title, beat up Jarrett and had a few matches with Angle.
|
|
|
Post by Yeezy's Mullet: Team X Blades on Mar 30, 2010 12:54:45 GMT -5
Ken > Orton. Couldn't care less what anybody says, Ken is more entertaining in TNA than Orton has been in about 6 years now. He also is - Faster in the ring. - Better in the mic. - Better moveset. - Better looking. - Better actor. - Better character. Of course, this is my opinion. And I'm not changing it, no matter who argues with me. Well, my opinion is that Kennedy sucks and Orton doesn't.
|
|
|
Post by thegenius on Mar 30, 2010 12:55:02 GMT -5
Ken > Orton. Couldn't care less what anybody says, Ken is more entertaining in TNA than Orton has been in about 6 years now. He also is - Faster in the ring. - Better in the mic. - Better moveset. - Better looking.- Better actor. - Better character. Of course, this is my opinion. And I'm not changing it, no matter who argues with me. And that makes him a better wrestler how? I'm just saying. Anderson has the full package where-as Orton doesn't. People say he does, but not in my eyes. Orton is bland, talks... really... slowwwly.... walks... really... slowwly and has terrible facial expressions. He's also a pretty bad actor. Yeah, I'd rather watch Anderson kicking somebody's ass with a microphone and spitting gum on their head in sick fashion over Orton acting like he has a seizure.
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Mar 30, 2010 12:56:41 GMT -5
Ken > Orton. Couldn't care less what anybody says, Ken is more entertaining in TNA than Orton has been in about 6 years now. He also is - Faster in the ring. - Better in the mic. - Better moveset. - Better looking.- Better actor. - Better character. Of course, this is my opinion. And I'm not changing it, no matter who argues with me. And that makes him a better wrestler how? None of those attributes make Mr Anderson a better wrestler than Orton because Orton is over and Mr Anderson isnt and never was.
|
|
|
Post by thegenius on Mar 30, 2010 12:58:01 GMT -5
So nobody agrees that Anderson's series of matches with Angle were better than Angle's series of matches with Orton? Sometimes, I don't know why I bother with this argument. People hate to prove me right so even if they do like Anderson better, they'll either deny or not say a thing. I rest my case, I have nothing left to say other than what I said above. Anything Orton can do, Anderson can do better. Only difference is Orton is main eventing, and Anderson wasn't.
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy on Mar 30, 2010 12:58:05 GMT -5
"at least get a new gimmick" made me lmfao
|
|
B-Radimus Prime
Main Eventer
R.I.P. Luna :(
Joined on: Jun 20, 2006 21:37:05 GMT -5
Posts: 2,572
|
Post by B-Radimus Prime on Mar 30, 2010 12:59:00 GMT -5
They are both PAINFULLY average in the ring.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Mar 30, 2010 12:59:24 GMT -5
The only thing Orton sucks at that Kennedy is better is the fact Kennedy can work a mic.
Now KK has become lackluster in his matches but i couldcareless
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Mar 30, 2010 13:00:45 GMT -5
Why do people still care what jsyn things? It's not worth arguing with someone so wrong all the time. How about that MVP win at Wrestlemania and Royal Rumble, his new theme music, his push against champ Randy Orton.....oh I could go on forever.
See, it's one thing to give your opinion. It's another to claim things are going to happen as if they are fact, and then they don't happen, so you are proven wrong.
but thats just my opinion, right?
|
|
|
Post by thegenius on Mar 30, 2010 13:01:00 GMT -5
"at least get a new gimmick" made me lmfao That made no sense either. Anderson created that gimmick, that's his thing. It makes no sense for him to change something that got him over in the first place. People know him for doing that, why would he change it? It's like saying "And you would think WWE would give Goldberg a new gimmick..."
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy on Mar 30, 2010 13:01:34 GMT -5
I've been critical of Orton's in-ring work before, but he's still miles ahead of Kennedy. Orton's more boring matches may not be fascinating when putting on the chinlock, but he still gets heat during them. I've seen far too many slow Kennedy matches where the crowd is dead silent throughout.
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Mar 30, 2010 13:01:45 GMT -5
Very cool to hear him talk without using the Viper gimmick.
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Mar 30, 2010 13:02:40 GMT -5
Ken > Orton. Couldn't care less what anybody says, Ken is more entertaining in TNA than Orton has been in about 6 years now. He also is - Faster in the ring. - Better in the mic. - Better moveset. - Better looking. - Better actor. - Better character. Of course, this is my opinion. And I'm not changing it, no matter who argues with me. Kennedy will never be able to put on Orton's jock strap. Believe me, I know this! BMIKT
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Mar 30, 2010 13:02:45 GMT -5
And that makes him a better wrestler how? I'm just saying. Anderson has the full package where-as Orton doesn't. People say he does, but not in my eyes. Orton is bland, talks... really... slowwwly.... walks... really... slowwly and has terrible facial expressions. He's also a pretty bad actor.Yeah, I'd rather watch Anderson kicking somebody's ass with a microphone and spitting gum on their head in sick fashion over Orton acting like he has a seizure. Its called a gimmick. Undertaker walks really slow and talks really slow and pulls terrible facial expressions, but that doesn't make him a bad wrestler.
|
|