|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jul 11, 2010 19:47:27 GMT -5
Joe's cool and all.... but what a  ing letdown. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 22:53:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2010 19:47:51 GMT -5
Hopefully Joe won't tag in Rob Terry, at all.
I wish this was a Joe-Kaz-AJ triple threat.
|
|
|
|
Post by P@ul on Jul 11, 2010 19:47:57 GMT -5
This has been a friggin' terrible PPV so far.
|
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jul 11, 2010 19:48:06 GMT -5
The rule was set this past Thursday that if any interference from TBP that Madison would be DQ'd and lose the title. The helmeted person wouldn't let the ref see them so he took it as it was a some from TBP and DQ'd her for outside inference by TBP and Angelina is the new champ. Which is still stupid, because WE DON'T KNOW who's under the helmet. Stupid stipulation in the first place. That's my problem with the finish, Madison should have been awarded the belt but lost the match. Then on iMPACT leading into Hard Justice they could set up Love/Rayne again while Love try to find out who is under the helment and then at Hard Justice it's revealed to be ____. Mickie James would be free, why not? |
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Jul 11, 2010 19:48:23 GMT -5
HAHAHAHAHA. Funny they come up with this seeing everyone else's guesses. Daniels, really? heh.
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafanboy44 on Jul 11, 2010 19:48:34 GMT -5
Terry and Joe?  ? I called it!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
*Ye@h B@by*
Main Eventer
Natalya ❤
Joined on: Jul 28, 2008 0:44:15 GMT -5
Posts: 2,969
|
Post by *Ye@h B@by* on Jul 11, 2010 19:48:52 GMT -5
The rule was set this past Thursday that if any interference from TBP that Madison would be DQ'd and lose the title. The helmeted person wouldn't let the ref see them so he took it as it was a some from TBP and DQ'd her for outside inference by TBP and Angelina is the new champ. Which is still stupid, because WE DON'T KNOW who's under the helmet. Stupid stipulation in the first place. I'm taking it as this female wouldn't show herself so the referee took it as they were from TBP, the reason they weren't revealing, and he DQ'd Madison for it. That's the only logical answer I have. |
|
|
|
Post by Odafin Tutuola on Jul 11, 2010 19:48:59 GMT -5
TNA always had shitty booking
|
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Jul 11, 2010 19:49:29 GMT -5
Someone wanna explain what went down with Madison/Angelina? I'm intrigued. Some biker chick came down and attacked Angelina, she wouldnt take her helmet off so the ref assumed it was one of tbp, Angelina won the belt and Madison rode off with Velvet (thats who i think anyway, too short for lacey) |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jul 11, 2010 19:49:40 GMT -5
Ugh, Rob Terry and Samoa Joe? Makes no sense. Way to drop the ball again, TNA. - Triple S How exactly did they drop the ball? They promised mystery opponents for Styles and Kazarian. Son of a gun, they're mystery opponents.. |
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jul 11, 2010 19:49:48 GMT -5
Which is still stupid, because WE DON'T KNOW who's under the helmet. Stupid stipulation in the first place. I'm taking it as this female wouldn't show herself so the referee took it as they were from TBP, the reason they weren't revealing, and he DQ'd Madison for it. That's the only logical answer I have. But didnt Madison ride away with her or something? |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jul 11, 2010 19:50:01 GMT -5
Someone wanna explain what went down with Madison/Angelina? I'm intrigued. Some biker chick came down and attacked Angelina, she wouldnt take her helmet off so the ref assumed it was one of tbp, Angelina won the belt and Madison rode off with Velvet (thats who i think anyway, too short for lacey) I don't know why you say Velvet.. she was darker than velvet and seemed to have dark hair.  |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 22:53:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2010 19:50:34 GMT -5
Normally I would be completely against this, but I think it will serve it's purpose by making AJ/Kaz earn their win against two "badasses".
|
|
|
|
Post by Jord on Jul 11, 2010 19:50:49 GMT -5
Which is still stupid, because WE DON'T KNOW who's under the helmet. Stupid stipulation in the first place. I'm taking it as this female wouldn't show herself so the referee took it as they were from TBP, the reason they weren't revealing, and he DQ'd Madison for it. That's the only logical answer I have. It makes sense that way. I think you hit the nail on the head. |
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jul 11, 2010 19:50:32 GMT -5
Ugh, Rob Terry and Samoa Joe? Makes no sense. Way to drop the ball again, TNA. - Triple S How exactly did they drop the ball? They promised mystery opponents for Styles and Kazarian. Son of a gun, they're mystery opponents.. Because they could have actually had a good surprise. I they were smart and wanted the same team, they could have said Joe and a mystery partner. |
|
*Ye@h B@by*
Main Eventer
Natalya ❤
Joined on: Jul 28, 2008 0:44:15 GMT -5
Posts: 2,969
|
Post by *Ye@h B@by* on Jul 11, 2010 19:50:56 GMT -5
Which is still stupid, because WE DON'T KNOW who's under the helmet. Stupid stipulation in the first place. That's my problem with the finish, Madison should have been awarded the belt but lost the match. Then on iMPACT leading into Hard Justice they could set up Love/Rayne again while Love try to find out who is under the helment and then at Hard Justice it's revealed to be ____. Mickie James would be free, why not? Yeah. That would have been good. Even though it wasn't actually Mickie tonight, it could be revealed to "have been" her at that PPV. By then her 90 day clause will be up so it would work well, like you said. |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jul 11, 2010 19:51:20 GMT -5
Normally I would be completely against this, but I think it will serve it's purpose by making AJ/Kaz earn their win against two "badasses". Agreed. |
|
|
|
Post by Flava Dave on Jul 11, 2010 19:50:37 GMT -5
Someone wanna explain what went down with Madison/Angelina? I'm intrigued. TNA signed Undertaker's ex-wife, Sara, and she rolled in on one of the bikes she got in the divorce. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 22:53:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2010 19:51:46 GMT -5
SG, you can't tell me they didn't have the chance to actually pull out a shocker. Even for a one-shot appearance, from someone like Bentley, Daniels, etc. Instead, their opponents are Joe and a waste of payroll.
- Triple S
|
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Jul 11, 2010 19:52:20 GMT -5
Ugh, Rob Terry and Samoa Joe? Makes no sense. Way to drop the ball again, TNA. - Triple S How exactly did they drop the ball? They promised mystery opponents for Styles and Kazarian. Son of a gun, they're mystery opponents.. Because it's a stupid team. |
|
