|
Post by gordon on Jun 23, 2010 15:10:59 GMT -5
Why is it that TNA fans think everything WWE does is a crime, a Rip Off, Bad for Business, etc. The WWE isnt losing fans, even with the PG Rating. lets see. WWE Sells out Madison Square Gardens, Staples Center, Conseco Field. and TNA only books shows on Sound Stages and in Bingo Halls. at least Paul Heyman and ECW never Claimed to be better then the WWE, they just made something diffrent. and thats WHAT TNA and their fans need to do, Create something diffrent. Right now its a water'd down version of WCW and WWE combined from Ten years ago. there is absolutely nothing Revelant about TNA Creating an Extreme Stable.....Done Creating another version of the Horseman....Done whomever is writing TNA, needs to Dig further. and find something Unique, not rehashing the Same ol. Stop Slamming WWE. obvisously, people are still fans First and foremost, nice way to put everyone in a group and claim that all TNA fans slam the WWE. Second off, the bolded part can go to some of the WWE fanbase that comes on here and complains about everything TNA does is "bad booking", a "WWE rip-off", etc. People who live in glass houses, shouldn't throw stones. What about people who live in stone houses? Should they throw glass?
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Jun 23, 2010 15:30:34 GMT -5
Michelle McCool is definitely not the most talented Diva on the WWE roster. Beth Phoenix, Melina, Gail Kim, Jillian Hall, Natalya, and Tamina are a million times better than she is. She's probably the best of all the Diva Search Rejects though, but that's not saying much. Jillian Hall? Really? Have you been watching? The woman in a trainwreck in the ring now. Beth is out, Melina is out, Natalya barely just had her first match in months, and Tamina isn't fantastic either. I'm just going to assume you rarely pay any attention to women's matches at all, because if you did it'd be very easy for you to see McCool is easily at the top. Go watch her series with Victoria, or her '09 series with Melina. I do pay attention to women's wrestling, but only good women's wrestling. To me Michelle McCool is not as good as any of the other Diva's I mentioned, including Jillian Hall. They all trained in OVW/FCW, what did Michelle McCool do? Lose a stupid Diva Search competition and then put out for the Undertaker. I'm sorry, I just can't stand Michelle McCool and I think she's a waste.
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Jun 23, 2010 16:45:43 GMT -5
Boy did I open up a can of worms.
Oh well. Go WWE.
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 23, 2010 17:55:33 GMT -5
TNA BP 10x> Laycool. that said, It is a blatant rip off that doesnt work. However, TNA really has no room to talk rippin off another company.
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jun 23, 2010 18:07:22 GMT -5
TNA BP 10x> Laycool. that said, It is a blatant rip off that doesnt work. However, TNA really has no room to talk rippin off another company. How is a (possibly fake) Angelina Love comment on FaceBook relate to TNA saying it? It doesn't.
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Jun 23, 2010 18:12:51 GMT -5
Jillian Hall? Really? Have you been watching? The woman in a trainwreck in the ring now. Beth is out, Melina is out, Natalya barely just had her first match in months, and Tamina isn't fantastic either. I'm just going to assume you rarely pay any attention to women's matches at all, because if you did it'd be very easy for you to see McCool is easily at the top. Go watch her series with Victoria, or her '09 series with Melina. I do pay attention to women's wrestling, but only good women's wrestling. To me Michelle McCool is not as good as any of the other Diva's I mentioned, including Jillian Hall. They all trained in OVW/FCW, what did Michelle McCool do? Lose a stupid Diva Search competition and then put out for the Undertaker. I'm sorry, I just can't stand Michelle McCool and I think she's a waste. So because of how McCool got here no matter how hard she trains in your mind she can never be great? That is kinda dumb because it is evident that she is a good women's wrestler. Tamina better than her? Please she can maybe turn into a good wrestler but have you watched any of her matches? Crap. Natalya saves the recent ones but all of her recent FCW stuff was very unimpressive to say the least.. Jillian is a good wrestler she just never is pushed. Having said that I still think McCool is better than her. Probably: Beth, Gail, Natalya, Melina, and McCool are the top 5 overall women in wwe [in no order] but atm only McCool is really being pushed to a belt [so called co champ...].
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Jun 23, 2010 18:33:12 GMT -5
McCool's title don't mean shit.
|
|
|
Post by thegenius on Jun 23, 2010 19:11:43 GMT -5
Well, Nattie is wrestling again, so no... Michelle is not the most talented diva currently wrestling. I'm not denying she had some great matches, but there is a reason she is on top of the division and Nattie isn't.
... Because Nattie's boyfriend isn't the Undertaker. Besides that, Gail Kim is a better wrestler than Michelle McCool.
|
|
|
Post by AdamBomb on Jun 23, 2010 19:50:02 GMT -5
Well, Nattie is wrestling again, so no... Michelle is not the most talented diva currently wrestling. I'm not denying she had some great matches, but there is a reason she is on top of the division and Nattie isn't. ... Because Nattie's boyfriend isn't the Undertaker. Besides that, Gail Kim is a better wrestler than Michelle McCool. Well that's funny you bring up her and Taker again, when someone who was on the inside and has no reason to lie, has said that her relationship has nothing to do with the spot she has.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 5, 2024 7:20:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2010 20:56:48 GMT -5
Well, Nattie is wrestling again, so no... Michelle is not the most talented diva currently wrestling. I'm not denying she had some great matches, but there is a reason she is on top of the division and Nattie isn't. ... Because Nattie's boyfriend isn't the Undertaker. Besides that, Gail Kim is a better wrestler than Michelle McCool. Well that's funny you bring up her and Taker again, when someone who was on the inside and has no reason to lie, has said that her relationship has nothing to do with the spot she has. Maybe they were friends, and she didn't want to sell her out?
|
|
|
Post by AdamBomb on Jun 23, 2010 21:18:06 GMT -5
Well that's funny you bring up her and Taker again, when someone who was on the inside and has no reason to lie, has said that her relationship has nothing to do with the spot she has. Maybe they were friends, and she didn't want to sell her out? Maybe, but I'm more inclined to believe someone who has actually been in the WWE, than I am to believe some random person on the internet.
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Jun 23, 2010 22:17:15 GMT -5
I seriously dont see how anyone thinks McCool or Layla puts on good matches. She might be a hard worker but just because you work hard doesnt mean you have talent. No she's not the worse on the roster but she really doesnt have that great of matches. Very bland and basic
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 23, 2010 22:36:40 GMT -5
TNA BP 10x> Laycool. that said, It is a blatant rip off that doesnt work. However, TNA really has no room to talk rippin off another company. How is a (possibly fake) Angelina Love comment on FaceBook relate to TNA saying it? It doesn't. Does it matter? It's obvious laycool is a rip off on BP, Whether someone from tna or tna themsleves said it or not does not take away that TNA should never say anything about rippin off of another company.
|
|
|
Post by AdamBomb on Jun 23, 2010 22:39:55 GMT -5
I seriously dont see how anyone thinks McCool or Layla puts on good matches. She might be a hard worker but just because you work hard doesnt mean you have talent. No she's not the worse on the roster but she really doesnt have that great of matches. Very bland and basic Go watch McCool vs. Melina from 2009 at The Bash, and then at Night of Champions. Youtube it, I don't care - but don't say, "I don't see how blah blah blah" if you're not willing to make a conscience effort on your own to watch something. Don't watch it all negatively, watch both matches with an openmind, and actually pay attention. A LOT of fans called those two matches the best women's matches since Trish/Mickie at WM, and for good reason.
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jun 23, 2010 22:42:49 GMT -5
How is a (possibly fake) Angelina Love comment on FaceBook relate to TNA saying it? It doesn't. Does it matter? It's obvious laycool is a rip off on BP, Whether someone from tna or tna themsleves said it or not does not take away that TNA should never say anything about rippin off of another company. But, TNA didn't say anything about it. I've already pointed out how Angelina Love's myspace says her FaceBook is for her family, friends, etc so I doubt she would post something like that on it much less someone have access to it to send it into a dirt sheet but even so, TNA didn't say anything about it. You act like TNA posted it on their website or announced it on iMPACT. I don't see how you can say TNA should never say anything about rippin off another company" when TNA didn't say anything..
|
|
|
Post by Byron F'N Saxton Fan on Jun 23, 2010 23:22:15 GMT -5
Does it matter? It's obvious laycool is a rip off on BP, Whether someone from tna or tna themsleves said it or not does not take away that TNA should never say anything about rippin off of another company. But, TNA didn't say anything about it. I've already pointed out how Angelina Love's myspace says her FaceBook is for her family, friends, etc so I doubt she would post something like that on it much less someone have access to it to send it into a dirt sheet but even so, TNA didn't say anything about it. You act like TNA posted it on their website or announced it on iMPACT. I don't see how you can say TNA should never say anything about rippin off another company" when TNA didn't say anything.. Angelina Love represents TNA, and if she did make the rip-off comment, then it reflects upon TNA. If TNA didn't want that kind of thing said publicly, tell talent not to discuss WWE and/or other Wrestling Companies. Simple Internet ground rules like the WWE rule that none of their Wrestlers can post on Twitter after 12:00am to avoid controversial and regretful statements, because if one were to be made, they(WWE) knows it would reflect upon them as one of their Contracted-talents tweeted it.
|
|
|
Post by AdamBomb on Jun 23, 2010 23:39:15 GMT -5
Angelina Love represents TNA, and if she did make the rip-off comment, then it reflects upon TNA. If TNA didn't want that kind of thing said publicly, tell talent not to discuss WWE and/or other Wrestling Companies. Simple Internet ground rules like the WWE rule that none of their Wrestlers can post on Twitter after 12:00am to avoid controversial and regretful statements, because if one were to be made, they(WWE) knows it would reflect upon them as one of their Contracted-talents tweeted it. That'd go over terribly, TNA themselves as a company can't go a couple of weeks without mentioning WWE. lmao
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jun 23, 2010 23:51:39 GMT -5
But, TNA didn't say anything about it. I've already pointed out how Angelina Love's myspace says her FaceBook is for her family, friends, etc so I doubt she would post something like that on it much less someone have access to it to send it into a dirt sheet but even so, TNA didn't say anything about it. You act like TNA posted it on their website or announced it on iMPACT. I don't see how you can say TNA should never say anything about rippin off another company" when TNA didn't say anything.. Angelina Love represents TNA, and if she did make the rip-off comment, then it reflects upon TNA. If TNA didn't want that kind of thing said publicly, tell talent not to discuss WWE and/or other Wrestling Companies. Simple Internet ground rules like the WWE rule that none of their Wrestlers can post on Twitter after 12:00am to avoid controversial and regretful statements, because if one were to be made, they(WWE) knows it would reflect upon them as one of their Contracted-talents tweeted it. Who says Angelina Love even said that? See the FaceBook fact that I've posted twice now. That's my entire point.
|
|
|
Post by Byron F'N Saxton Fan on Jun 24, 2010 0:06:09 GMT -5
Angelina Love represents TNA, and if she did make the rip-off comment, then it reflects upon TNA. If TNA didn't want that kind of thing said publicly, tell talent not to discuss WWE and/or other Wrestling Companies. Simple Internet ground rules like the WWE rule that none of their Wrestlers can post on Twitter after 12:00am to avoid controversial and regretful statements, because if one were to be made, they(WWE) knows it would reflect upon them as one of their Contracted-talents tweeted it. Who says Angelina Love even said that? See the FaceBook fact that I've posted twice now. That's my entire point. I was simply answering to the idea that she did(As evidenced by "If she did" being in my Post), since you and Deskjet started discussing that.
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Jun 24, 2010 1:46:02 GMT -5
I fail to see too many similarities. So because girls act snobby they must be a rip off? Couldn't the same be said for TBP since Vince's Vixens were around years ago? Still I don't see Lay-Cool acting like a bunch of tramps, so what do they have in common exactly?
|
|