|
Post by indy on Aug 15, 2010 23:18:32 GMT -5
I only think this is rediculous because if it was Christians trying to build a church, they wouldn't be allowed. And why does the mosque have to be right next to ground zero? 1. You don't know that, because that's not the situation at hand. 2. Because that's where they legally purchased the land. No, I do know that. Anytime there is a cross or anything anywhere, everyone has a ing fit and demands it be taken down. Everyone is allowed to have their religion except for Christians. And I'm not even Christian by the way. I just call things the way I see them.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Aug 15, 2010 23:31:51 GMT -5
1. You don't know that, because that's not the situation at hand. 2. Because that's where they legally purchased the land. No, I do know that. Anytime there is a cross or anything anywhere, everyone has a ing fit and demands it be taken down. Everyone is allowed to have their religion except for Christians. And I'm not even Christian by the way. I just call things the way I see them. If the cross is on public land then there is something to complain about. But if it is on private land which the church owns, no one complains.
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Aug 16, 2010 3:20:09 GMT -5
I only think this is rediculous because if it was Christians trying to build a church, they wouldn't be allowed. And why does the mosque have to be right next to ground zero? ... When is the last time there was a national outcry about a church being built?
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Aug 16, 2010 11:38:55 GMT -5
I am now pissed off at both the Republicans and Obama. Obama has basically backed off and is now saying, "Umm, I didn't really mean that. I think we should have freedom of religion, but I'm not sure about this mosque thing 'cuz supporting it seems like a politically bad idea even if it is the right thing to do." The Republicans are bashing Obama because he supported it in the first place.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 23, 2024 9:40:56 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2010 11:42:53 GMT -5
Wish someone could should step in and decide one way or the other. For how many straight days am I going to only hear about politicans opinions and not a decision?
|
|
spam
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Jan 31, 2010 13:17:51 GMT -5
Posts: 110
|
Post by spam on Aug 16, 2010 12:16:37 GMT -5
He didnt say they conquered everywhere they built a mosque, he said they build a mosque everywhere they conquerIn the Islamic religion, Muslims always build mosques in the places they conquer. Not trying to be a smart ass either, it's 100% true. So what did they conquer here in Wisconsin where they want to build a new mosque? How about in California? Or even Tennessee?
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Aug 16, 2010 12:20:22 GMT -5
Did Obama speak before he was told what too say about this situation? Or is he really just that stupid.
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Aug 16, 2010 12:38:42 GMT -5
He didnt say they conquered everywhere they built a mosque, he said they build a mosque everywhere they conquerSo what did they conquer here in Wisconsin where they want to build a new mosque? How about in California? Or even Tennessee? Historically, Christians build churches every place they conquer.
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Aug 16, 2010 12:45:15 GMT -5
It is not the best scenario but whatever they own the land so let them do with it however they want as long as it isn't against the law..
|
|
|
Post by Deep Figure Value on Aug 16, 2010 13:00:38 GMT -5
I guess I'm still really torn on this notion. I support their constitutional right to build their mosque, but I still just think it's in really, really bad taste to do so. That said, my daily conservative radio station ran off these ideas that would probably be within rights to build, in bad taste, and it made me laugh.
A Kool-Aid Quality Tasting Facility in Jonestown, Guyana A Ryder Rental Truck Station at 200 N.W. 5th St, Oklahoma City, OK
And my personal favorite....
The Ted Kennedy Memorial Driving School on Chappaquiddick Island.
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Aug 16, 2010 16:10:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Aug 16, 2010 16:19:02 GMT -5
He didnt say they conquered everywhere they built a mosque, he said they build a mosque everywhere they conquerSo what did they conquer here in Wisconsin where they want to build a new mosque? How about in California? Or even Tennessee? It's the same thing. Conquering where you build a mosque and building a mosque where you conquer, doesn't matter how you phrase it, it is the same exact thing.
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Aug 17, 2010 4:22:16 GMT -5
|
|
HoganBai
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 15, 2004 15:06:24 GMT -5
Posts: 4,682
|
Post by HoganBai on Aug 17, 2010 8:26:13 GMT -5
He didnt say they conquered everywhere they built a mosque, he said they build a mosque everywhere they conquer It's the same thing. Conquering where you build a mosque and building a mosque where you conquer, doesn't matter how you phrase it, it is the same exact thing. I think he means that they have mosque's wherever, and not every place has been "conquered" but in a place that they conquer they will build a mosque there. So while nothing has happened in Wisconsin, the one in NYC is right where they have conquered, hence the mosque being built. I must say I've never heard that being said about mosque's being built on conquered land but meh.
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Aug 17, 2010 9:45:17 GMT -5
It's the same thing. Conquering where you build a mosque and building a mosque where you conquer, doesn't matter how you phrase it, it is the same exact thing. I think he means that they have mosque's wherever, and not every place has been "conquered" but in a place that they conquer they will build a mosque there. So while nothing has happened in Wisconsin, the one in NYC is right where they have conquered, hence the mosque being built. I must say I've never heard that being said about mosque's being built on conquered land but meh. ***Alert!! Alert!!! Alert!!!*** This just in!!! Muslims conquer NYC!!! Details at a 11!!!
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Aug 17, 2010 9:44:38 GMT -5
I don't see a problem with it.
I'm sure some Muslims also grieve after what had happened on 9/11. Their lives were affected too.
|
|
|
Post by Mole on Aug 17, 2010 9:50:40 GMT -5
I think he means that they have mosque's wherever, and not every place has been "conquered" but in a place that they conquer they will build a mosque there. So while nothing has happened in Wisconsin, the one in NYC is right where they have conquered, hence the mosque being built. I must say I've never heard that being said about mosque's being built on conquered land but meh. ***Alert!! Alert!!! Alert!!!*** This just in!!! Muslims conquer NYC!!! Details at a 11!!! And afterward, a Paranoid American special report: Are the Japanese People Moving in Next Door Spies of the Rising Sun?
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Aug 17, 2010 15:54:47 GMT -5
I don't see a problem with it. I'm sure some Muslims also grieve after what had happened on 9/11. Their lives were affected too. And I'm sure at least one Muslim, who was not a terrorist, was killed on that day as well.
|
|
ZT
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 1, 2008 20:50:05 GMT -5
Posts: 3,631
|
Post by ZT on Aug 20, 2010 11:17:31 GMT -5
It is not a mosque, it is a community center, and it's 3 blocks away in an old Burlington Coat Factory. What is the ing issue here?
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Aug 20, 2010 11:49:47 GMT -5
It's a mosque.
Anyone have a map of the WTC Grounds and where this will actually be?
|
|