|
Post by sxe on Oct 22, 2010 16:42:40 GMT -5
Yea I am sure that is why they held it there. ![::)](http://www.wrestlingfigs.com/images/rolleyes.gif) Sorry S.G. It is similar to the NWO. TNA is not orginial. I'm sorry, am I not entitled to my opinion? I'm not wrong, because it's an opinion, so, stop blowing smoke and trying to tell me I am wrong. You should really just move on because it's obvious you have no argument other than "oh... the music is the same.. oh no". Move on. Despite the fact that Hardys reasons for doing waht he did..and Hogans reasons for doing what he did are similar. So, yea you are wrong. So just shut the hell up. No S.G. you are the last person entitled to an opinion because I hate you. You are trying to argue for why they are not the same and push it off as a fact. When it can clearly be seen that it is similar to the NWO.
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Oct 22, 2010 16:44:29 GMT -5
Jeff Hardy is like Hogan. When Hogan came back he said the fans could stick it...more or less Hardy said the same thing. Fortune can be the infulx of talent that joins the group just because. It is funny to S.G. when ever you want to grasp at straws to defend the company that is alright. Face it, TNA ebayed a used copy of WCW's play book. But hardy isnt really the leader of the group/ He's the centerpiece but the leaders are bischoff/Hogan. The other members arent following Jeff, they are following Hogan/bischoff. Jeff is just a piece of the puzzle that adds cohesiveness to a strong faction. You can draw alot of similarities to the nwo, but I dont think enough to make a strong case that it's an exact copy. It's the joining of two groups instead of 3 guys then other members of the roster joining in. Perhaps a variation of the nwo in terms of purpose is a better case to be made? But with bischoff/jarret barking that this is for the betterment of TNA, even that is debateable. For all we know, this could turn out to be a good thing for TNA ![:-/](http://www.wrestlingfigs.com/images/undecided.gif)
|
|
|
Post by sxe on Oct 22, 2010 16:46:02 GMT -5
Jeff Hardy is like Hogan. When Hogan came back he said the fans could stick it...more or less Hardy said the same thing. Fortune can be the infulx of talent that joins the group just because. It is funny to S.G. when ever you want to grasp at straws to defend the company that is alright. Face it, TNA ebayed a used copy of WCW's play book. But hardy isnt really the leader of the group/ He's the centerpiece but the leaders are bischoff/Hogan. The other members arent following Jeff, they are following Hogan/bischoff. Jeff is just a piece of the puzzle that adds cohesiveness to a strong faction. You can draw alot of similarities to the nwo, but I dont think enough to make a strong case that it's an exact copy. It's the joining of two groups instead of 3 guys then other members of the roster joining in. Perhaps a variation of the nwo in terms of purpose is a better case to be made? But with bischoff/jarret barking that this is for the betterment of TNA, even that is debateable. For all we know, this could turn out to be a good thing for TNA ![:-/](http://www.wrestlingfigs.com/images/undecided.gif) Going out of business would be a great thing for TNA. Hogan was the center piece of the NWO. Much like Hardy is for this group. Bischoff was the one calling most of the shots, remember?
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Oct 22, 2010 16:48:40 GMT -5
I'm sorry, am I not entitled to my opinion? I'm not wrong, because it's an opinion, so, stop blowing smoke and trying to tell me I am wrong. You should really just move on because it's obvious you have no argument other than "oh... the music is the same.. oh no". Move on. Despite the fact that Hardys reasons for doing waht he did..and Hogans reasons for doing what he did are similar. So, yea you are wrong. So just shut the hell up. No S.G. you are the last person entitled to an opinion because I hate you. You are trying to argue for why they are not the same and push it off as a fact. When it can clearly be seen that it is similar to the NWO. Wow, you hate me? I am honored that I have had that much effect on your personal life that you can honestly HATE me. I am almost flattered that I, someone you have never met nor know personally, have made you so angry that you HATE me because I have a difference of opinions than you. You really should considering seeing someone about that, hate isn't good. I also laughed at how your tune has changed from last week when you PMed me to ask "No hard feelings". My, oh, my how things have changed. EDIT: Also, being similar does not make it the same thing for crying out loud. I can cook french fries that are similar to those at Zaxby's but it isn't the same thing.
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Oct 22, 2010 16:50:11 GMT -5
But hardy isnt really the leader of the group/ He's the centerpiece but the leaders are bischoff/Hogan. The other members arent following Jeff, they are following Hogan/bischoff. Jeff is just a piece of the puzzle that adds cohesiveness to a strong faction. You can draw alot of similarities to the nwo, but I dont think enough to make a strong case that it's an exact copy. It's the joining of two groups instead of 3 guys then other members of the roster joining in. Perhaps a variation of the nwo in terms of purpose is a better case to be made? But with bischoff/jarret barking that this is for the betterment of TNA, even that is debateable. For all we know, this could turn out to be a good thing for TNA ![:-/](http://www.wrestlingfigs.com/images/undecided.gif) Going out of business would be a great thing for TNA. Hogan was the center piece of the NWO. Much like Hardy is for this group. Bischoff was the one calling most of the shots, remember? Initially, he was not, It was Hogan. bischoff came on later and by that time Nwo had morphed from a faction to practically it's own company/brand. the nwo was something that evolved, immortal just is.
|
|
|
Post by No Brokeback on Oct 22, 2010 16:51:46 GMT -5
But hardy isnt really the leader of the group/ He's the centerpiece but the leaders are bischoff/Hogan. The other members arent following Jeff, they are following Hogan/bischoff. Jeff is just a piece of the puzzle that adds cohesiveness to a strong faction. You can draw alot of similarities to the nwo, but I dont think enough to make a strong case that it's an exact copy. It's the joining of two groups instead of 3 guys then other members of the roster joining in. Perhaps a variation of the nwo in terms of purpose is a better case to be made? But with bischoff/jarret barking that this is for the betterment of TNA, even that is debateable. For all we know, this could turn out to be a good thing for TNA ![:-/](http://www.wrestlingfigs.com/images/undecided.gif) Going out of business would be a great thing for TNA. Hogan was the center piece of the NWO. Much like Hardy is for this group. Bischoff was the one calling most of the shots, remember? Can we just report this guy for trying to start crap in almost every post on this board and not succeeding?
|
|
|
Post by sxe on Oct 22, 2010 16:52:31 GMT -5
Despite the fact that Hardys reasons for doing waht he did..and Hogans reasons for doing what he did are similar. So, yea you are wrong. So just shut the hell up. No S.G. you are the last person entitled to an opinion because I hate you. You are trying to argue for why they are not the same and push it off as a fact. When it can clearly be seen that it is similar to the NWO. Wow, you hate me? I am honored that I have had that much effect on your personal life that you can honestly HATE me. I am almost flattered that I, someone you have never met nor know personally, have made you so angry that you HATE me because I have a difference of opinions than you. You really should considering seeing someone about that, hate isn't good. I also laughed at how your tune has changed from last week when you PMed me to ask "No hard feelings". My, oh, my how things have changed. GAHH I don't really hate you. I don't understand though, on a serious note. As to why you can not see the things planted in front of your face? To say this group is not like the NWO is stupid. When clearly it is. Same design, lets have a hand picked champion. Lets bring a crap load of guys into the group. The reason they held it in the same bulding is a weak excuse as well. Come on man.
|
|
|
Post by sxe on Oct 22, 2010 16:54:56 GMT -5
Going out of business would be a great thing for TNA. Hogan was the center piece of the NWO. Much like Hardy is for this group. Bischoff was the one calling most of the shots, remember? Can we just report this guy for trying to start crap in almost every post on this board and not succeeding? Um no because i've done nothing against the TOS actually...
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Oct 22, 2010 16:56:25 GMT -5
DeskJet or anyone, can you please tell this "dude", that I clearly stated that it is similar in nature to the nWo but it is NOT exactly like the nWo?
|
|
|
Post by sxe on Oct 22, 2010 16:58:12 GMT -5
DeskJet or anyone, can you please tell this "dude", that I clearly stated that it is similar in nature to the nWo but it is NOT exactly like the nWo? VERY VERY similar in nature.
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Oct 22, 2010 17:02:03 GMT -5
Again, you have changed your tune from what YOU said earlier and I quote...: How in the world is "Immortal" like anything that was done in WCW? Are you for real? It's just like the NWO... even down to Hogans theme music...be ![](http://www.wrestlingfigs.com/images/wfcensored.gif) ing serious for a minute... that **** is not orginial. You went from saying it was "just like the nWo" to now it just being "similar". Anything else you want to flip-flop on? You should have said from the start they were similar instead of saying "it's just like the nWo". Being similar in nature (one/two aspects) does not equal "just like the nWo".
|
|
|
Post by No Brokeback on Oct 22, 2010 17:05:11 GMT -5
Again, you have changed your tune from what YOU said earlier and I quote...: Are you for real? It's just like the NWO... even down to Hogans theme music...be ![](http://www.wrestlingfigs.com/images/wfcensored.gif) ing serious for a minute... that **** is not orginial. You went from saying it was "just like the nWo" to now it just being "similar". Anything else you want to flip-flop on? You should have said from the start they were similar instead of saying "it's just like the nWo". Being similar in nature (one/two aspects) does not equal "just like the nWo". I'm glad you're good at defending yourself and all that, especially for those people who just don't stop with their ridiculous accusations, but this guy is not going to stop, no matter what you say. However, it's entertaining to read. Actually, watching what you guys type has shades of Sting vs Hogan all over it. SG being the face and Future Shock being the heel. It's exactly like the NWO angle, or well, at least it's similar in nature.
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Oct 22, 2010 17:08:10 GMT -5
Again, you have changed your tune from what YOU said earlier and I quote...: You went from saying it was "just like the nWo" to now it just being "similar". Anything else you want to flip-flop on? You should have said from the start they were similar instead of saying "it's just like the nWo". Being similar in nature (one/two aspects) does not equal "just like the nWo". I'm glad you're good at defending yourself and all that, especially for those people who just don't stop with their ridiculous accusations, but this guy is not going to stop, no matter what you say. However, it's entertaining to read. Actually, watching what you guys type has shades of Sting vs Hogan all over it. SG being the face and Future Shock being the heel. It's exactly like the NWO angle, or well, at least it's similar in nature. Ha! Anyways, let's get back on-top... you know.. ReAction from last night. I thought it was the best ones yet and felt like a greatly put together documentary. Did anyone notice that Bischoff's clips where done inside the Ocean Center the day of "Bound for Glory"? That's pretty neat.
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Oct 22, 2010 17:08:29 GMT -5
Wow, you hate me? I am honored that I have had that much effect on your personal life that you can honestly HATE me. I am almost flattered that I, someone you have never met nor know personally, have made you so angry that you HATE me because I have a difference of opinions than you. You really should considering seeing someone about that, hate isn't good. I also laughed at how your tune has changed from last week when you PMed me to ask "No hard feelings". My, oh, my how things have changed. GAHH I don't really hate you. I don't understand though, on a serious note. As to why you can not see the things planted in front of your face? To say this group is not like the NWO is stupid. When clearly it is. Same design, lets have a hand picked champion. Lets bring a **** load of guys into the group. The reason they held it in the same bulding is a weak excuse as well. Come on man. You want him to see your points but you're not really taking the time to see his. Not really fair, and is an example of being blind on the other spectrum. Hey, Sg, and others get heat for being one sided but I dont think it's fair we get on them for being one sided but then do the same thing even if it is negative towards tna. The negativity/posivity needs to be at least tempered with the willingness to look at different perspectives. Understanding those perspectives may not change your mind, but it will at least allow you to see where the other person is coming from. That is, and this is the key, if that person has a legitimate argument to back up his claims. Which in this case Sg, does.
|
|
|
Post by sxe on Oct 22, 2010 17:09:20 GMT -5
Again, you have changed your tune from what YOU said earlier and I quote...: You went from saying it was "just like the nWo" to now it just being "similar". Anything else you want to flip-flop on? You should have said from the start they were similar instead of saying "it's just like the nWo". Being similar in nature (one/two aspects) does not equal "just like the nWo". I'm glad you're good at defending yourself and all that, especially for those people who just don't stop with their ridiculous accusations, but this guy is not going to stop, no matter what you say. However, it's entertaining to read. Actually, watching what you guys type has shades of Sting vs Hogan all over it. SG being the face and Future Shock being the heel. It's exactly like the NWO angle, or well, at least it's similar in nature. LOL I am the face...S.G is the heel...
|
|
|
Post by sxe on Oct 22, 2010 17:13:03 GMT -5
I'm glad you're good at defending yourself and all that, especially for those people who just don't stop with their ridiculous accusations, but this guy is not going to stop, no matter what you say. However, it's entertaining to read. Actually, watching what you guys type has shades of Sting vs Hogan all over it. SG being the face and Future Shock being the heel. It's exactly like the NWO angle, or well, at least it's similar in nature. Ha! Anyways, let's get back on-top... you know.. ReAction from last night. I thought it was the best ones yet and felt like a greatly put together documentary. Did anyone notice that Bischoff's clips where done inside the Ocean Center the day of "Bound for Glory"? That's pretty neat. I can honestly say, that if TNA did not air so many promos during Impact. I might watch Reaction.
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Oct 22, 2010 17:37:10 GMT -5
Ha! Anyways, let's get back on-top... you know.. ReAction from last night. I thought it was the best ones yet and felt like a greatly put together documentary. Did anyone notice that Bischoff's clips where done inside the Ocean Center the day of "Bound for Glory"? That's pretty neat. I can honestly say, that if TNA did not air so many promos during Impact. I might watch Reaction. WHile I dint watch reaction, the premise of the show is poorly defined. Rendering impact underused and reaction nearly pointless. If they are gonna have wrestling, then do the bulk of your wrestling on impact and save most of the talk for reaction. They had a better balance this week.
|
|
|
Post by specterkev on Nov 4, 2010 22:06:32 GMT -5
Poor uncle Eric just got clobbered
|
|
|
Post by Mike Bockwinkel on Nov 4, 2010 22:15:47 GMT -5
Nobodys gonna come in here this week either?
|
|
|
Post by specterkev on Nov 4, 2010 22:16:10 GMT -5
probaably
|
|