|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Aug 24, 2010 15:05:01 GMT -5
Advertising for the Bound for Glory PPV suggests the TNA Heavyweight title tournament will come down to Kurt Angle vs. Mr. Anderson, which, as things stand, is the planned finals for the vacant championship.
-----
Whoop!
|
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Aug 24, 2010 15:20:34 GMT -5
GAY
|
|
|
|
Post by Jord on Aug 24, 2010 15:22:31 GMT -5
I feel like Hardy/Angle should have been the main event because they are TNA's top draws currently. But, Angle/Anderson will still be a great match.
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan17: The Total Package on Aug 24, 2010 16:57:31 GMT -5
I also feel that Hardy should be in the Main Event. But then remembered the stip if Kurt loses to him at No Surrender he's done....sounds like a good main event nonetheless.
|
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Aug 24, 2010 17:02:50 GMT -5
Anderson better not win this.
|
|
|
|
Post by ttr23 on Aug 24, 2010 17:30:39 GMT -5
yay it's not like we havent seen that macth 100000 times before
|
|
|
|
Post by raabhimselffanv2 on Aug 24, 2010 17:36:00 GMT -5
The Pope > Anderson
|
|
|
|
Post by Thick Justice on Aug 24, 2010 18:55:11 GMT -5
yay it's not like we havent seen that macth 100000 times before Who cares it was an awesome series. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 21, 2024 5:33:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2010 16:25:52 GMT -5
Yawn. We've already seen this match 3-5 times this year, why do it AGAIN.
|
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Aug 26, 2010 6:30:04 GMT -5
Yawn. We've already seen this match 3-5 times this year, why do it AGAIN. Because it was awesome? *shrugs*. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 21, 2024 5:33:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2010 8:48:59 GMT -5
Yawn. We've already seen this match 3-5 times this year, why do it AGAIN. Because it was awesome? *shrugs*. I don't remember their one on one, no gimmick matches being awesome tbh. AJ/Daniels/Joe was TNA's best match. But look how long they left it for a rematch. Doing loads of the same match in one year just ruins it. If RVD wasn't dead, they should've done RVD vs. Angle. |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan17: The Total Package on Aug 26, 2010 12:50:42 GMT -5
Because it was awesome? *shrugs*. I don't remember their one on one, no gimmick matches being awesome tbh. AJ/Daniels/Joe was TNA's best match. But look how long they left it for a rematch. Doing loads of the same match in one year just ruins it. If RVD wasn't dead, they should've done RVD vs. Angle. I like that idea |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Aug 27, 2010 2:38:20 GMT -5
Because it was awesome? *shrugs*. I don't remember their one on one, no gimmick matches being awesome tbh. AJ/Daniels/Joe was TNA's best match. But look how long they left it for a rematch. Doing loads of the same match in one year just ruins it. If RVD wasn't dead, they should've done RVD vs. Angle. Yeah, uh, they left Joe/Daniels/Styles alone for five months before having the rematch at AAO '05. Angle/Anderson hasn't wrestled (one-on-one) since Lockdown which will be five months next month. |
|
|
|
Post by American Phenom on Aug 27, 2010 3:25:07 GMT -5
The problem is, all of Anderson and Angle's matches sucked (except for Lockdown).
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 21, 2024 5:33:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2010 9:49:49 GMT -5
I don't remember their one on one, no gimmick matches being awesome tbh. AJ/Daniels/Joe was TNA's best match. But look how long they left it for a rematch. Doing loads of the same match in one year just ruins it. If RVD wasn't dead, they should've done RVD vs. Angle. Yeah, uh, they left Joe/Daniels/Styles alone for five months before having the rematch at AAO '05. Angle/Anderson hasn't wrestled (one-on-one) since Lockdown which will be five months next month. AAO 2005 was AJ vs Daniels in the 30 min iron man... If you're gonna try and prove me wrong, at least get your year right  Ok so I used a bad example, but my point is still valid. Only their Lockdown match was anything beyond "ok". So why do it again, in the same year as their last feud, at TNA's WrestleMania. |
|
|
|
Post by ttr23 on Aug 27, 2010 10:11:46 GMT -5
Yeah, uh, they left Joe/Daniels/Styles alone for five months before having the rematch at AAO '05. Angle/Anderson hasn't wrestled (one-on-one) since Lockdown which will be five months next month. AAO 2005 was AJ vs Daniels in the 30 min iron man... If you're gonna try and prove me wrong, at least get your year right Ok so I used a bad example, but my point is still valid. Only their Lockdown match was anything beyond "ok". So why do it again, in the same year as their last feud, at TNA's WrestleMania. why did we see beer money and the motor citcy machine guns wrestle each other 8 times in a month it's because tna is stupid |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Aug 27, 2010 14:31:16 GMT -5
Yeah, uh, they left Joe/Daniels/Styles alone for five months before having the rematch at AAO '05. Angle/Anderson hasn't wrestled (one-on-one) since Lockdown which will be five months next month. AAO 2005 was AJ vs Daniels in the 30 min iron man... If you're gonna try and prove me wrong, at least get your year right Ok so I used a bad example, but my point is still valid. Only their Lockdown match was anything beyond "ok". So why do it again, in the same year as their last feud, at TNA's WrestleMania. Sorry, hit the 5 instead of 6. . When you look at it though, it's the only option they had for a less predictable match. - Jeff Hardy: I think everyone is aware of the fact that he won't be getting the TNA World Title anytime soon. Could he have main evented BFG? Sure. But, for what reason? He might be over with kids/women but those kids/women aren't new viewers as they ratings haven't shot up nor have the buyrates. TNA is playing it safe (and smart) by not pushing him to the main event so sudden as it would come back to bite them. There's a difference between using someone with pending drug charges and rewarding that person. When wrestling (TNA included) is under a micro-scope, it's better to play it safe than sorry. - D'Angelo Dinero: Dinero is ready to main event, but not carry the strap. If he wouldn't have gotten injured in April, yes but not anytime soon imo. Anderson vs. Angle is the only other option because everyone else that could main event is in another angle.l Sting is feuding with Jeff Jarrett so that takes those two away. AJ Styles is feuding with EV 2.0 and has the TV title. I also think it works because Angle will have actually still worked through the Top 10 (with the exception of one) with this method. I'm not saying it's the best idea in the world.. but it's the only option. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 21, 2024 5:33:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2010 16:01:47 GMT -5
AAO 2005 was AJ vs Daniels in the 30 min iron man... If you're gonna try and prove me wrong, at least get your year right Ok so I used a bad example, but my point is still valid. Only their Lockdown match was anything beyond "ok". So why do it again, in the same year as their last feud, at TNA's WrestleMania. Sorry, hit the 5 instead of 6. . When you look at it though, it's the only option they had for a less predictable match. - Jeff Hardy: I think everyone is aware of the fact that he won't be getting the TNA World Title anytime soon. Could he have main evented BFG? Sure. But, for what reason? He might be over with kids/women but those kids/women aren't new viewers as they ratings haven't shot up nor have the buyrates. TNA is playing it safe (and smart) by not pushing him to the main event so sudden as it would come back to bite them. There's a difference between using someone with pending drug charges and rewarding that person. When wrestling (TNA included) is under a micro-scope, it's better to play it safe than sorry. - D'Angelo Dinero: Dinero is ready to main event, but not carry the strap. If he wouldn't have gotten injured in April, yes but not anytime soon imo. Anderson vs. Angle is the only other option because everyone else that could main event is in another angle.l Sting is feuding with Jeff Jarrett so that takes those two away. AJ Styles is feuding with EV 2.0 and has the TV title. I also think it works because Angle will have actually still worked through the Top 10 (with the exception of one) with this method. I'm not saying it's the best idea in the world.. but it's the only option. Well when you put it that way, you're right. Compared the other options actually available, I suppose they didn't have much choice. |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Aug 27, 2010 16:27:31 GMT -5
Sorry, hit the 5 instead of 6. . When you look at it though, it's the only option they had for a less predictable match. - Jeff Hardy: I think everyone is aware of the fact that he won't be getting the TNA World Title anytime soon. Could he have main evented BFG? Sure. But, for what reason? He might be over with kids/women but those kids/women aren't new viewers as they ratings haven't shot up nor have the buyrates. TNA is playing it safe (and smart) by not pushing him to the main event so sudden as it would come back to bite them. There's a difference between using someone with pending drug charges and rewarding that person. When wrestling (TNA included) is under a micro-scope, it's better to play it safe than sorry. - D'Angelo Dinero: Dinero is ready to main event, but not carry the strap. If he wouldn't have gotten injured in April, yes but not anytime soon imo. Anderson vs. Angle is the only other option because everyone else that could main event is in another angle.l Sting is feuding with Jeff Jarrett so that takes those two away. AJ Styles is feuding with EV 2.0 and has the TV title. I also think it works because Angle will have actually still worked through the Top 10 (with the exception of one) with this method. I'm not saying it's the best idea in the world.. but it's the only option. Well when you put it that way, you're right. Compared the other options actually available, I suppose they didn't have much choice. I know I'm right! I am always right   |
|
|
|
Post by sonofanarchy on Aug 27, 2010 17:51:55 GMT -5
Until TNA takes advantage of "card subject to change" And the title match gets changed to Sharkboy Vs Sabu for the TNA title.
|
|
