|
Post by BV on Dec 27, 2010 23:54:18 GMT -5
If only Garrett Hartley wasn't a dick, the Saints would of had this division. Oh well, I'm glad we're headed to the playoffs, hopefully against the NFC West.
|
|
|
Post by Happy Pizza on Dec 27, 2010 23:55:23 GMT -5
After not watching a Monday Night game with complete attention for months, I gotta say that the commercials are out of control. I don't notice it on Sundays because I just watch RedZone but tonight I felt like the game was interrupting my commercials.
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Dec 28, 2010 0:13:27 GMT -5
I take away from this that the Falcons defense played fantastic against a premier offense. The offense didn't play well at all, and they gave the ball away twice on stupid fumbles. Just like the first game, it could have gone either way. I hate that it comes down to the last game. I think they will take care of business against Carolina, but you never know.
But I am encouraged with how great the defense played, and that when the spotlight is on, are able to stand up to a premier offense. Even though we lost, I still think it bodes well for the playoffs.
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Dec 28, 2010 0:13:41 GMT -5
Ok...so then Vick is out, right? Vick is better than Brady in various ways, various stats. But Cassel is not better than Brady in any way whatsoever. Vick is a better rushed. Vick is faster. Vick is more athletic. Whoopie. Not saying Cassel is better than Brady or Vick or anyone. Simply saying if you are gonna talk about people in consideration for the MVP.....Cassel's name deserves to be mentioned. And besides MVP stands for most valuable player.....not who is better, though that seems how its usually determined. And I do believe that Cassel is more valuable to the Chiefs than Brady is to the Pats. But that by no means makes me think Cassel is better than Brady.
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Dec 28, 2010 0:15:29 GMT -5
Anyone not named Tom Brady this year, shouldn't even be able to look at the MVP trophy.
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Ralphio on Dec 28, 2010 0:48:06 GMT -5
I just think its hilarious that Rotoworld and sites were telling people to bench Brady and that he was barely a QB1 because he lost Randy Moss, and all the Pats will do is dink and dunk.
Stuff like that makes me laugh.
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Dec 28, 2010 0:56:19 GMT -5
I just think its hilarious that Rotoworld and sites were telling people to bench Brady and that he was barely a QB1 because he lost Randy Moss, and all the Pats will do is dink and dunk. Stuff like that makes me laugh. Bench Brady? HELL NO! But they werent too far off with dink and dunk. A lot of the Pats offense is running horizontal versus vertical threat. Sure they have had a few to Deion Branch. But it seems a lot of the Pats offense has gone through swing passes, outs, quick slants and crossing patterns.
|
|
BasedGod
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 26, 2005 7:24:58 GMT -5
Posts: 1,600
|
Post by BasedGod on Dec 28, 2010 1:24:29 GMT -5
Hey, whatever works for our team. We had no other choice then to switch our gameplan up. Our whole offense revolved around Moss' threat and Wes Welker. Now Wes isnt even as scary as he used to be.
And in Cassel's defense, heck he's only been in the league for five years. He was a protege under Brady and Belichick and you can totally see it in KC. Thats a good thing for KC fans because he pretty much ran the same offense when he played for NE that year. Im not saying he deserves mvp, but just wait like 2-3 years. Hes already looking like a little Brady out there. He even took the Patriots to a 10-6 record that year, one that would of made the wild card playoffs any other year but 2008....
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Dec 28, 2010 1:37:34 GMT -5
Vick is a better rushed. Vick is faster. Vick is more athletic. Whoopie. Not saying Cassel is better than Brady or Vick or anyone. Simply saying if you are gonna talk about people in consideration for the MVP.....Cassel's name deserves to be mentioned. No, he doesn't. Cassel is not better in ANY WAY than Brady. At least you can make a case that Vick is better at SOMETHING. And I do believe that Cassel is more valuable to the Chiefs than Brady is to the Pats. But that by no means makes me think Cassel is better than Brady. This is so blatantly ridiculous that I don't even have a response for it.
|
|
BasedGod
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 26, 2005 7:24:58 GMT -5
Posts: 1,600
|
Post by BasedGod on Dec 28, 2010 2:09:16 GMT -5
Without Brady, NE would be nothing. Ill admit that. Without Cassel, they'd be just as shitty as they were last year.
|
|
|
Post by Greg Weinstein on Dec 28, 2010 2:15:44 GMT -5
Without Brady, NE would be nothing. Ill admit that. Without Cassel, they'd be just as poopty as they were last year. They had Cassel last year too, though.
|
|
BasedGod
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 26, 2005 7:24:58 GMT -5
Posts: 1,600
|
Post by BasedGod on Dec 28, 2010 2:24:26 GMT -5
i know that, im just proving a point. KC wouldnt really lose anything because no one thought they were even going to be this good to begin with. They just happened to prove us wrong. If they lost Cassel, it it wouldnt be as huge because they did shitty with him last year.
|
|
K Dot
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 5, 2005 10:06:08 GMT -5
Posts: 1,771
|
Post by K Dot on Dec 28, 2010 3:14:04 GMT -5
Thank you. I really needed that laugh tonight. Vick is good, but imo the only reason why hes a threat like he is because of his ability to run the ball. If he couldn't scramble like he can, hed be just another above-average quarterback. His passing game is not the best, and he really only developed it to this level after he came back. Vick has only thrown for 20 TDs one other time in his career. All his other seasons his TD/INT ratio is about the same.I hope you're kidding.
|
|
BasedGod
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 26, 2005 7:24:58 GMT -5
Posts: 1,600
|
Post by BasedGod on Dec 28, 2010 3:54:51 GMT -5
Vick is good, but imo the only reason why hes a threat like he is because of his ability to run the ball. If he couldn't scramble like he can, hed be just another above-average quarterback. His passing game is not the best, and he really only developed it to this level after he came back. Vick has only thrown for 20 TDs one other time in his career. All his other seasons his TD/INT ratio is about the same.I hope you're kidding. Go look at his ing stats. The only other time was 2006 and he ended up throwing 13 picks. In 2005, his TD/INT ratio was 15/13. THe year before 14/12. In 2002 he was 16/8. LOL Vick is such a joke, he's just established himself as a "pretty good" pocket passer this year. Ill give him credit when he performs this good again next season. When he plays all 16 games so you vick nuthuggers cant complain that he didnt play a full season.
|
|
Jamal
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 24, 2005 14:53:44 GMT -5
Posts: 4,877
|
Post by Jamal on Dec 28, 2010 11:05:26 GMT -5
Without Brady, this run wouldn't be possible for me. Not bad for someone who was ranked 2nd last in the pre-season rankings.
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Dec 28, 2010 11:30:33 GMT -5
Your guys got hot at the right time and you made a move to get Steve Johnson.
Ya' did good, kid. Hahaha.
|
|
|
Post by "The Visionary" Eldniw on Dec 28, 2010 13:47:17 GMT -5
WOO! It's on! Going to my first regular season game tonight! Eagles/Vi-Queens. Never been able to afford tickets to go to any others, but tonight's are free-for-me tickets.
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Dec 28, 2010 14:00:15 GMT -5
Vi-queens? Really?
|
|
|
Post by "The Visionary" Eldniw on Dec 28, 2010 14:52:34 GMT -5
Yes I said it. Vi-Queens. LoL. It's a joke, don't take it so serious.
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Dec 28, 2010 15:07:38 GMT -5
I wasn't taking it serious. I just haven't heard that one in a few years.
|
|