|
Post by legendkiller8 on Oct 5, 2010 7:47:48 GMT -5
Ever time I read your reply it depresses me, DTP. DTP offers better replies in my honest opinion. DTP helps the writer point out what he may have done improperly and shares his honest opinion. He isn't afraid to tell us that something sucks. CENA offers replies that pretty much say your show is good and all aspects of it for the most part were great. I highly doubt every show he has ever read has been amazing. DTP wins. Wasn't it obvious? He's a way better replier than I am. My focus was being the most consistent. Congrats on your "win" DTP.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hammers on Oct 5, 2010 8:23:11 GMT -5
I honestly find Dan's replies hypocritical at times to be fair. While they are a lot more helpful than most replies given out, he does tend to say some stuff that deserves a big face palm. One prime example is the "I JUST DON'T FIND YOUR STORYLINE VERY REALISTIC" then he goes and makes Raven the leader of the Main Event Mafia. Bah.
Still love ya, Dan.
|
|
|
Post by chaz on Oct 5, 2010 8:25:43 GMT -5
Dan is the best replier here. He actually puts effort into them. On top of that, he is one of the smartest guys here, so his replies make sense. If anybody is offended by his replies, you need to learn to take criticism.
First Bret Hart entry on its way.
|
|
|
Post by totti on Oct 5, 2010 8:25:57 GMT -5
I honestly find Dan's replies hypocritical at times to be fair. While they are a lot more helpful than most replies given out, he does tend to say some stuff that deserves a big face palm. One prime example is the "I JUST DON'T FIND YOUR STORYLINE VERY REALISTIC" then he goes and makes Raven the leader of the Main Event Mafia. Bah. Still love ya, Dan. shits goin' downnnnnnnnn
|
|
|
Post by DTP. on Oct 5, 2010 9:13:34 GMT -5
I honestly find Dan's replies hypocritical at times to be fair. While they are a lot more helpful than most replies given out, he does tend to say some stuff that deserves a big face palm. One prime example is the "I JUST DON'T FIND YOUR STORYLINE VERY REALISTIC" then he goes and makes Raven the leader of the Main Event Mafia. Bah. Still love ya, Dan. Nice example from eleven months ago, genius. I admit that was a bad idea but to be honest, nobody's ever perfect. I'll admit, I'm absolutely poor at spacing out a storyline and executing it properly, and my layout can be extremely poor [length, which I plan to heal]. Maybe I can be a little hypocritical, but when I reply to a show I take the role of 'Internet wrestling fan reviewer' from YouTube. I'll tone it down a bit for you guys, but I'm just stating whatever is on my mind when I read something. What I think I'll write. Oh, and Raven was just a webbed member of the Mafia, for your info. Love all this talk about me though, I love you guys.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hammers on Oct 5, 2010 9:16:30 GMT -5
Wasn't complaining, just expressing my opinion, as I said, you're one of the better repliers on the board.
|
|
|
Post by DTP. on Oct 5, 2010 9:18:19 GMT -5
I know man, didn't mean anything I said in a negative manner, I like receiving some constructive criticism too. Whenever anybody replies to me, be free to be as harsh as you want. I need to find something more to improve on.
|
|
|
Post by totti on Oct 5, 2010 9:36:44 GMT -5
I honestly find Dan's replies hypocritical at times to be fair. While they are a lot more helpful than most replies given out, he does tend to say some stuff that deserves a big face palm. One prime example is the "I JUST DON'T FIND YOUR STORYLINE VERY REALISTIC" then he goes and makes Raven the leader of the Main Event Mafia. Bah. Still love ya, Dan. Nice example from eleven months ago, genius. I admit that was a bad idea but to be honest, nobody's ever perfect. I'll admit, I'm absolutely poor at spacing out a storyline and executing it properly, and my layout can be extremely poor [length, which I plan to heal]. Maybe I can be a little hypocritical, but when I reply to a show I take the role of 'Internet wrestling fan reviewer' from YouTube. I'll tone it down a bit for you guys, but I'm just stating whatever is on my mind when I read something. What I think I'll write. Oh, and Raven was just a webbed member of the Mafia, for your info. Love all this talk about me though, I love you guys. most of those people are fools.
|
|
|
Post by DTP. on Oct 5, 2010 9:43:08 GMT -5
Nice example from eleven months ago, genius. I admit that was a bad idea but to be honest, nobody's ever perfect. I'll admit, I'm absolutely poor at spacing out a storyline and executing it properly, and my layout can be extremely poor [length, which I plan to heal]. Maybe I can be a little hypocritical, but when I reply to a show I take the role of 'Internet wrestling fan reviewer' from YouTube. I'll tone it down a bit for you guys, but I'm just stating whatever is on my mind when I read something. What I think I'll write. Oh, and Raven was just a webbed member of the Mafia, for your info. Love all this talk about me though, I love you guys. most of those people are fools. Okay Jake..
|
|
|
Post by Elliot on Oct 5, 2010 11:34:07 GMT -5
I feel like crying... Edge to SmackDown? Get the out of my mind, WWE!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 25, 2024 8:22:42 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 5, 2010 11:36:47 GMT -5
u is teh copier.
|
|
|
Post by shiftyeyes on Oct 5, 2010 11:53:59 GMT -5
I feel like crying... Edge to SmackDown? Get the out of my mind, WWE! this is how Soda feels about TNA, just that he books things before they do it xD As for replying, I think Dan does the best ones, since he actually spends time to read over them, gives good advice as well as an honest opinion, and gives them out pretty regularly, which is something some of the better repliers on here, such as Chaz and Duaner don't always do (not a criticism there btw). Some of you I get the feeling that you skim over, read the results, and say whether you liked it or not, which isn't really that helpful, nor is it a good reply. I try to give good replies, but I'm still learning, so mine won't always be the 'best' as such.
|
|
Jack.
Main Eventer
Probably out Skating
Joined on: Feb 23, 2009 11:06:38 GMT -5
Posts: 4,907
|
Post by Jack. on Oct 5, 2010 12:59:27 GMT -5
Meh, I was really into WWE 2009 but since I've have computer issues over the past week I've been drawn away from it, I'd like to do a WWE 2010 starting from Bragging Rights with a backstory. This would put me ahead of WWE and make the diary more original. What do you guys think? It seems that WWE diaries last longer when started at the end of the year than post-Mania.
|
|
|
Post by Rule 30 on Oct 5, 2010 13:40:31 GMT -5
Ever time I read your reply it depresses me, DTP. DTP offers better replies in my honest opinion. DTP helps the writer point out what he may have done improperly and shares his honest opinion. He isn't afraid to tell us that something sucks. CENA offers replies that pretty much say your show is good and all aspects of it for the most part were great. I highly doubt every show he has ever read has been amazing. DTP wins. I was kidding around, as DTP seems to always be that negative guy. I must of forgot this IS NOT A CHAT thread.
|
|
|
Post by Elliot on Oct 5, 2010 13:52:29 GMT -5
Meh, I was really into WWE 2009 but since I've have computer issues over the past week I've been drawn away from it, I'd like to do a WWE 2010 starting from Bragging Rights with a backstory. This would put me ahead of WWE and make the diary more original. What do you guys think? It seems that WWE diaries last longer when started at the end of the year than post-Mania.Or when done by me. Yeah, take that.
|
|
|
Post by duan on Oct 5, 2010 14:23:53 GMT -5
DTP offers better replies in my honest opinion. DTP helps the writer point out what he may have done improperly and shares his honest opinion. He isn't afraid to tell us that something sucks. CENA offers replies that pretty much say your show is good and all aspects of it for the most part were great. I highly doubt every show he has ever read has been amazing. DTP wins. I was kidding around, as DTP seems to always be that negative guy. I must of forgot this IS NOT A CHAT thread.
|
|
|
Post by DTP. on Oct 5, 2010 14:42:16 GMT -5
DTP offers better replies in my honest opinion. DTP helps the writer point out what he may have done improperly and shares his honest opinion. He isn't afraid to tell us that something sucks. CENA offers replies that pretty much say your show is good and all aspects of it for the most part were great. I highly doubt every show he has ever read has been amazing. DTP wins. I was kidding around, as DTP seems to always be that negative guy. I must of forgot this IS NOT A CHAT thread. I can't help that I'm a pessimistic thinker. When I predict things will be bad in a future show in a diary, and then turns out good, it cheers me up and my outlook is better. I honestly think though, harsher criticism could make this board more competitive and maybe exciting for simmers to improve.
|
|
|
Post by ✖ AJ on Oct 5, 2010 14:55:02 GMT -5
Meh, I was really into WWE 2009 but since I've have computer issues over the past week I've been drawn away from it, I'd like to do a WWE 2010 starting from Bragging Rights with a backstory. This would put me ahead of WWE and make the diary more original. What do you guys think? It seems that WWE diaries last longer when started at the end of the year than post-Mania.Or when done by me. Yeah, take that. Or Kev and I.
|
|
|
Post by shiftyeyes on Oct 5, 2010 15:41:46 GMT -5
Expect to see the 2005 make a return at some point in the next couple of days, with Smackdown's PPV No Mercy up. (:
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Oct 5, 2010 15:42:36 GMT -5
I feel like crying... Edge to SmackDown? Get the out of my mind, WWE! this is how Soda feels about TNA, just that he books things before they do it xD As for replying, I think Dan does the best ones, since he actually spends time to read over them, gives good advice as well as an honest opinion, and gives them out pretty regularly, which is something some of the better repliers on here, such as Chaz and Duaner don't always do (not a criticism there btw). Some of you I get the feeling that you skim over, read the results, and say whether you liked it or not, which isn't really that helpful, nor is it a good reply. I try to give good replies, but I'm still learning, so mine won't always be the 'best' as such. Yeah, I should be getting royalty checks off "Ink Inc", it was my idea!
|
|