|
|
Post by slappy on Oct 12, 2010 19:56:48 GMT -5
"With You I'm Born Again" by Billy Preston and Syreeta.
Two of the characters on Glee sang it and the teacher and other students were appalled that they sang the song and they were offended by the choice of song.
I don't see what is so wrong with it.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 19:58:27 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2010 22:53:16 GMT -5
Well. They said they were more offended by the outfits and how they chose to perform the song. But good point Slap, I was too wondering the same thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Oct 12, 2010 22:54:24 GMT -5
Well. They said they were more offended by the outfits and how they chose to perform the song. But good point Slap, I was too wondering the same thing. Rachel and Finn said they needed to pick an offensive song and they chose that one, so I was just wondering, because the song doesn't seem offensive. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 19:58:27 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2010 22:57:08 GMT -5
This is what I found online about it
"Rachel was dressed as a child and Finn as a priest, and it was a love song. Think about all the controversy with children and priests, and you have your inappropriate-ness."
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Oct 12, 2010 22:59:47 GMT -5
This is what I found online about it "Rachel was dressed as a child and Finn as a priest, and it was a love song. Think about all the controversy with children and priests, and you have your inappropriate-ness." I couldn't tell she was dressed as a child. And plus priests like boys I thought. I never really heard of a priest touching a little girl. But I do understand with that explanation why it would seem offensive. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 19:58:27 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2010 23:01:03 GMT -5
Hahahahah. Regardless though. I find that point to be valid. I don't see any other problems with that. Alot of the comments online are about the same thing. I duno man. It just seems stupid anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by ß®å¢K$ßâ¢k on Oct 13, 2010 1:50:29 GMT -5
This is what I found online about it "Rachel was dressed as a child and Finn as a priest, and it was a love song. Think about all the controversy with children and priests, and you have your inappropriate-ness." I couldn't tell she was dressed as a child. And plus priests like boys I thought. I never really heard of a priest touching a little girl. But I do understand with that explanation why it would seem offensive. *Insert hand over face* |
|
|
|
Post by Barrett on Oct 13, 2010 13:45:28 GMT -5
I thought she was supposed to be a nun.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Oct 13, 2010 15:58:01 GMT -5
I thought she was supposed to be a nun. That's what I figured without the habit so that's why I was confused. |
|
|
|
Post by DgenerationX092 on Oct 13, 2010 16:10:36 GMT -5
wanna hear some offensive music? Credit goes to my Minority Studies class lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lk™ on Oct 14, 2010 17:39:21 GMT -5
it's basically insinuating pedophelia in the church.
|
|
