the hell demon
Main Eventer
i must possess all, or i possess nothing
Joined on: Nov 16, 2006 12:48:46 GMT -5
Posts: 3,592
|
Post by the hell demon on Dec 5, 2010 5:07:39 GMT -5
I feel making it 40 feet tall or whatever they did ruined it TBH. They might as well do the Ready To Rumble triple cage with all that room.  |
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Dec 5, 2010 7:22:50 GMT -5
They ruined it by re-structuring it and making it more safe and professional looking. Then they over-used it for pointless Matches and made a PPV out of it. It should of been used literally once every three to four years, to settle the biggest of Fueds.
I feel the only way they can really salvage the Hell in a Cell Match now would be for them to not use it for about three years, and bring it back for an Armageddon Hell in a Cell Match.
For a new concept though, I like the idea of the three Hell in a Cells stacked on top of each other with the objective to get to the top of the third one. Not sure if anything would really work though with the Company being PG.
|
|
|
|
Post by skribbel24 on Dec 5, 2010 7:23:24 GMT -5
As long as it's not a Punjabi Prison!
|
|
Sonnen
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 16, 2010 8:42:36 GMT -5
Posts: 3,261
|
Post by Sonnen on Dec 5, 2010 7:28:04 GMT -5
Okay guys, I've got this concept, we get a steel cage, a hell in a cell and... DOGS! I mean wouldn't that be awe-... oh crap wait.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian from 616Entertainment. on Dec 5, 2010 9:23:28 GMT -5
What about the Triple Cage? They used it in that WCW movie "Ready to Rumble" and then I think they actually used it twice in WCW for real, I remember marking for it big time.  Or, even though it's similar to a Scaffold match, what if WWE tried to copy The Pit from Mortal Kombat? Obviously without spikes at the bottom, lets be real here. TNA made it work with Elevation X a few years ago. I'm sure WWE's people could get an idea going with a platform or ring on a high level or something. Whatever. Leave it to them.  |
|
|
|
Post by alexgg on Dec 5, 2010 9:27:18 GMT -5
Its the the match its the damn ppv named after match giving us less then surprising matchs in the cell that dont need the cell at all.
If they didnt have any gimmick ppvs a hiac match or a tlc match would be a shock and people would want to see it.
Like kane vs edge at TLC it would be more surprising if the ppv wasnt called TLC and was still named Armageddon.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 23:42:16 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2010 9:48:22 GMT -5
Or, even though it's similar to a Scaffold match, what if WWE tried to copy The Pit from Mortal Kombat? Obviously without spikes at the bottom, lets be real here. TNA made it work with Elevation X a few years ago. I'm sure WWE's people could get an idea going with a platform or ring on a high level or something. Whatever. Leave it to them. "The following contest.... is MORTAL KOMBAT!!!!!!!" *begins playing techno music* |
|
|
|
Post by Eat Defeat. on Dec 5, 2010 11:15:52 GMT -5
A Steel Punjabi Chamber in a Cell match.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheNinthCloud on Dec 5, 2010 12:42:10 GMT -5
No ladder match Cell stuff. Just terrible. Steel Cage was amazing until the whole win by pinfall or submission crap came into play.
|
|
MikeMillenium
Main Eventer
I LOVE THE WWE AND EVERYTHING ABOUT IT
Joined on: Jul 21, 2010 13:45:54 GMT -5
Posts: 1,622
|
Post by MikeMillenium on Dec 5, 2010 12:56:48 GMT -5
Am I the only one who thinks having a HIAC pay per view isn't bad at all? The ONLY thing is that whatever feud is forced to be HIAC, rather than at the most opportune time. But, it's not like the cell matches are happening way too often now. They've pretty much happened every year since they first started, as well as three times in 1998 and twice in 2000, 2002 and 2005.
I just don't see how having a HIAC ppv is much different. It's not like they usually keep it a secret to get PPV buyers. It's announced and marketed the same way, just that it has it's own PPV. The only thing is that whatever feud is happening is forced to be in the cell.
What's the difference between HIAC, TLC & Extreme Rules PPVs and Survivor Series, Royal Rumble, & King Of The Ring PPVs?
Anyways I want WAR GAMES.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheNinthCloud on Dec 5, 2010 12:58:58 GMT -5
Am I the only one who thinks having a HIAC pay per view isn't bad at all? The ONLY thing is that whatever feud is forced to be HIAC, rather than at the most opportune time. But, it's not like the cell matches are happening way too often now. They've pretty much happened every year since they first started, as well as three times in 1998 and twice in 2000, 2002 and 2005. I just don't see how having a HIAC ppv is much different. It's not like they usually keep it a secret to get PPV buyers. It's announced and marketed the same way, just that it has it's own PPV. The only thing is that whatever feud is happening is forced to be in the cell. What's the difference between HIAC, TLC & Extreme Rules PPVs and Survivor Series, Royal Rumble, & King Of The Ring PPVs? Anyways I want WAR GAMES. There is one RR match per year. |
|
Tim Sorenson
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 2, 2005 17:10:18 GMT -5
Posts: 4,521
|
Post by Tim Sorenson on Dec 5, 2010 13:04:11 GMT -5
Triple cage.
|
|
|
|
Post by ✖ AJ on Dec 5, 2010 13:45:49 GMT -5
Steel Cage Ultimate X.
Oh wait...
|
|
|
|
Post by The Assassin on Dec 5, 2010 15:10:56 GMT -5
WAR GAMES obviously... and for those who haven't seen War Games thanks to WWE/Vince pretending WCW never existed - its basically two rings joined together, surrounded by a tight-fitting (goes right upto the apron) fully enclosed cage. the participants are in teams and the wrestlers enter one by one (referee lets them in through the door), every [whatever] minutes. team surrender is the only way the match ends and you usually don't know who's coming out from behind the curtain until the buzzer sounds (like in the royal rumble) War Games was  ing epic. WWE need to quit continiously trying to bury WCW's legacy and instead, embrace it as part of their history, bring back the good ideas and let it's memory live on. |
|
RedwineRaider
Superstar
Joined on: Dec 15, 2005 23:43:15 GMT -5
Posts: 931
|
Post by RedwineRaider on Dec 5, 2010 15:45:47 GMT -5
They milked HIAC dry by running these stupid gimmick PPV's. They also restructured it and made it bigger than before, which killed it's look.
I want 98-05 Hell in a Cell back, the same structure. No added height or size, that's ridiculous. If they don't want combatants on the roof, just don't book it that way. No need to change the entire structure to ensure "there's no way they'll get up there."
Ridiculous. And yes HIAC has been overused and therefore should go away and return in a few years. Hell, 5 years. People will mark like crazy.
War Games is the only thing I can think of. Anything else will suck. Punjabi Prison Match? God, I hate 2006 WWE and on.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Assassin on Dec 5, 2010 16:04:57 GMT -5
^ yeh i agree, you gotta keep these gimmick matches occassional or they lose what makes them special
|
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Dec 5, 2010 16:16:15 GMT -5
War Games cant be done as a PG event. Please dont ruin it. Thunder Dome or Chamber of Horrors. Both are cheesy enough for WWE Weren't the Fall Brawl PPV's rated TV-PG? I know WWE can have blood on a PG show, but if they can have five-straight Cells without Blood, I'm sure they could get away with a bloodless War Games Match. As for the new Cage, God forbid WWE attempts to make a Card worth ordering. The Hell in a Cell has run it's course when Randy Orton and Sheamus are in one on PPV and Undertaker and Kane use it as not even a feud-blowoff. However, as Kenny Powers said, the Cell wouldn't run it's course if it was used when it was needed, not every year, twice or three times with any feud to try and boost PPV buyrates. Blood, violence, hatred, factions is what makes War Games great. WWE has NONE of that right now except for Nexus |
|
|
|
Post by Edge618 on Dec 5, 2010 16:36:50 GMT -5
Its the the match its the damn ppv named after match giving us less then surprising matchs in the cell that dont need the cell at all. If they didnt have any gimmick ppvs a hiac match or a tlc match would be a shock and people would want to see it. Like kane vs edge at TLC it would be more surprising if the ppv wasnt called TLC and was still named Armageddon. Yeah it was like, "Winner of this match on SD! gets to choose the stip at the TLC PPV." Yeah, wonder what the winner will choose  |
|
Vintage ToneBoat
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 27, 2008 14:17:16 GMT -5
Posts: 2,097
|
Post by Vintage ToneBoat on Dec 5, 2010 16:52:36 GMT -5
well according to pg guide lines hell in a cell is too graphic...expect a bouncy tent.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 23:42:16 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2010 17:10:26 GMT -5
|
|
