|
|
Post by KMIS™ on Dec 16, 2010 21:58:08 GMT -5
By the way, if you don't like the facial recognition software, you could always ... turn it off. Yeah, I'm sure that works well. It may shut it off publically so that you nor your friends can see it, but Facebook or whoever they give information to could use it. Even if your profile is private people can still access your information. Shutting something off or setting something a certain way doesn't mean what you hope to achieve will happen. The information you provide. If you want your city/date of birth/phone number/credit card number on Facebook, you provide it. The only thing that isn't would be things your friends would tag you in, which you can easily untag yourself. Don't want it, delete your Facebook and stop crying. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Dec 16, 2010 22:06:28 GMT -5
Then I should probably just off myself since I don't want the government intruding more into my life. Don't like them violating my rights? Well then either move to another country or die.
Then again if you do live in another country they can still try and get you on certain crimes.
|
|
|
|
Post by KMIS™ on Dec 16, 2010 22:22:10 GMT -5
Then I should probably just off myself ...  |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Dec 16, 2010 22:25:19 GMT -5
Then I should probably just off myself ... When you edit my quote like that, it makes it seem like I'm saying if I were to delete my facebook, I might as well kill myself. |
|
|
|
Post by KMIS™ on Dec 16, 2010 22:38:49 GMT -5
I might as well kill myself.  |
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Dec 16, 2010 22:40:18 GMT -5
KMIS, just because you "untag" yourself from the photo does not mean that they don't have record of who was tagged in the photo. In fact, I can almost guarantee Facebook has records of that.
|
|
|
|
Post by KMIS™ on Dec 16, 2010 23:00:32 GMT -5
KMIS, just because you "untag" yourself from the photo does not mean that they don't have record of who was tagged in the photo. In fact, I can almost guarantee Facebook has records of that. Well, yes. I give them permission to that when I create an account. I don't mind them having a picture of my girlfriend and I playing in the snow, thus I have no problem giving them permission to store that image on their Big Daddy V sized mega computer. I'm sure when you created a WF account, you didn't read all of the Registration Terms & Rules and such. I'm sure there's a few things in that that you'd not particularly like. That's the internet these days. You sign up for something or create an account somewhere, you give permission for that site to _________. |
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Dec 16, 2010 23:29:51 GMT -5
KMIS, just because you "untag" yourself from the photo does not mean that they don't have record of who was tagged in the photo. In fact, I can almost guarantee Facebook has records of that. Well, yes. I give them permission to that when I create an account. I don't mind them having a picture of my girlfriend and I playing in the snow, thus I have no problem giving them permission to store that image on their Big Daddy V sized mega computer. I'm sure when you created a WF account, you didn't read all of the Registration Terms & Rules and such. I'm sure there's a few things in that that you'd not particularly like. That's the internet these days. You sign up for something or create an account somewhere, you give permission for that site to _________. You need to understand, though, that it's not just about "having a picture of you and your girlfriend playing in the snow." If the government decides that your girlfriend is a "terrorist," based on their hilariously loose definition of the word, you are now committing a federal crime by "playing in the snow" with her. And now you're on camera harboring a terrorist whether you are "tagged" in the picture or not. I know this sounds ridiculous, but I urge you to look into the laws surrounding this stuff. I wish it wasn't true, but it is. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 20:19:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 16, 2010 23:33:09 GMT -5
Really don't see the big deal at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Dec 17, 2010 1:40:49 GMT -5
Well, yes. I give them permission to that when I create an account. I don't mind them having a picture of my girlfriend and I playing in the snow, thus I have no problem giving them permission to store that image on their Big Daddy V sized mega computer. I'm sure when you created a WF account, you didn't read all of the Registration Terms & Rules and such. I'm sure there's a few things in that that you'd not particularly like. That's the internet these days. You sign up for something or create an account somewhere, you give permission for that site to _________. You need to understand, though, that it's not just about "having a picture of you and your girlfriend playing in the snow." If the government decides that your girlfriend is a "terrorist," based on their hilariously loose definition of the word, you are now committing a federal crime by "playing in the snow" with her. And now you're on camera harboring a terrorist whether you are "tagged" in the picture or not. I know this sounds ridiculous, but I urge you to look into the laws surrounding this stuff. I wish it wasn't true, but it is.
So if I took a photo of Charles Manson back years ago and photoshopped my head onto one of the people he's standing by, then I was there..
If I photoshopped my head onto Godzilla destroying Japan... I WAS THERE.....
MY GAWD.. It's brilliant.  |
|
|
|
Post by DMO™ on Dec 17, 2010 1:41:55 GMT -5
By the way, if you don't like the facial recognition software, you could always ... turn it off. When one of my friends "tags" me in a picture, there's not really much I can do. Untag yourself? |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 20:19:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2010 1:43:13 GMT -5
all of my ifo is fake anyways  |
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Dec 17, 2010 1:43:30 GMT -5
When one of my friends "tags" me in a picture, there's not really much I can do. Untag yourself? As mentioned in other posts, Facebook would have record of who has been "tagged" in a photo, even if you 'untag' yourself. |
|
Captain d00m - Mr. 3000
Main Eventer
Bringing death and destruction since 2005!
Joined on: Dec 2, 2005 20:52:43 GMT -5
Posts: 3,376
|
Post by Captain d00m - Mr. 3000 on Dec 17, 2010 4:17:04 GMT -5
You need to understand, though, that it's not just about "having a picture of you and your girlfriend playing in the snow." If the government decides that your girlfriend is a "terrorist," based on their hilariously loose definition of the word, you are now committing a federal crime by "playing in the snow" with her. And now you're on camera harboring a terrorist whether you are "tagged" in the picture or not. I know this sounds ridiculous, but I urge you to look into the laws surrounding this stuff. I wish it wasn't true, but it is.
So if I took a photo of Charles Manson back years ago and photoshopped my head onto one of the people he's standing by, then I was there..
If I photoshopped my head onto Godzilla destroying Japan... I WAS THERE.....
MY GAWD.. It's brilliant. I demand you come to my house and clean up all the water I just spit out because of your post. That was great. I really dont think anythings gonna happen with this. Will the government track us? Oh, yeah. Theyre already listening and watching everything we do. Will they be breaking into our house and taking us to Gitmo for our pictures? More than likely not. |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Dec 17, 2010 6:47:14 GMT -5
Anyone that doesn't have a problem with this or thinks that it isn't a big deal needs to wake up and smell the coffee. This is definitely NOT cool. I'm seriously considering deleting my facebook account now.
|
|
|
|
Post by wweuniverse47871 on Dec 17, 2010 7:13:47 GMT -5
I honestly couldn't give a  ! I have mates that post things on facebook that they shouldn't like them stealing stuff or going to smoke weed. Has the government done anything? No. I best there is over 1 Million posts a day about Bashing someone, Underage drinking or doing drugs. The government won't send 1 million police to 1 million different houses. Have I made my point? It's not a big deal! |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Dec 17, 2010 7:15:22 GMT -5
I honestly couldn't give a ! I have mates that post things on facebook that they shouldn't like them stealing stuff or going to smoke weed. Has the government done anything? No. I best there is over 1 Million posts a day about Bashing someone, Underage drinking or doing drugs. The government won't send 1 million police to 1 million different houses. Have I made my point? It's not a big deal! If it happens to even one person, it's a big deal. |
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Dec 17, 2010 7:17:48 GMT -5
Seriously, people overreact on the silliest things.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Dec 17, 2010 7:37:38 GMT -5
Seriously, people overreact on the silliest things. Yeah, who cares about privacy and freedom and liberty? We don't really need those things. |
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Dec 17, 2010 8:45:16 GMT -5
Seriously, people overreact on the silliest things. Yeah, who cares about privacy and freedom and liberty? We don't really need those things. I understand that, but this is stupid to go crazy over. If everyone blamed every software update on a social network site as a tool for the government to get information on you, then I consider it overreacting. There not going to check every single profile on the damn site, only the ones with serious criminal records, even then they will only look for information on there when they've committed a crime again. They've been doing this a lot longer than we've known, don't know why people are getting pissed off now. And deleting your profile won't solve anything either, as Facebook just deactivates it and keeps all your information sorted until the next time you sign in with the same email and password you used so they will reactive your account. |
|
