mgwyn
Superstar
Joined on: Jan 6, 2010 16:54:57 GMT -5
Posts: 665
|
Post by mgwyn on Dec 17, 2010 13:57:47 GMT -5
Yea, WWE always uses a 20 x 20 ring.
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Dec 17, 2010 14:08:07 GMT -5
You bitch and complain alot. It's for your toys.. Not your promotion.. Really!? I cant have an opinion. Just stop. I think this is the first negative thread I've made on the Mattel board. Which is the point I am making. 21x21 was too big for a 6-7". So how can a 5-6" be in scale with a 22x22? And to those who think they know what size a WWE ring is....you're WRONG. WWE rings change. Depending on the venue, whether its tv or a house show, etc. WWE changes the size of the ring they will use. So perhaps for the Nexus attack, they used a 20X20 and other places they may use a larger or smaller one. False. Very false. All WWE rings conform to the same standard. WCW rings were smaller (18 x 18, same as the TNA ring, I believe) but WWE rings are all 20 x 20. Just use a basic spring ring if an actual scaled ring is too big for your needs. Telling silly lies to make yourself feel better about it isn't going to do you any favours. Oh my God. Thank you all knowing in correcting me. Problem is.....I'VE SEEN IT WITH MY OWN EYES and know a couple of the drivers who load the damn rings and unload them in to the arena. So you are false....very false. Telling silly lies in order to try and correct me only makes you look even sillier. As far as a Spring ring, I think thats what I may have to do. I havent tried a Mattel spring ring, but fear if its like Jakks it will be too small. P.S. This is a message board....its for discussion. I posted this topic to get some info and ideas. I then took that info. and ideas and tried to do some math to see if it was actually in scale. It wasnt. Obviously, some folks are going to be happy with the product and some or even very little are not. This is by far not the first instance of it, but I am seeing A LOT of extremely snide remarks directed to anyone on the Mattel board that says something remotely negative towards Mattel, where on the Jakks board people are slamming Jakks left and right and that seems to be the "in" thing. Funny......this time last year, most of the same people swore how they would NEVER switch to Mattel and how the refused to start over. What a difference a year makes. Sincerely, Little Bo Peep
|
|
cyantist
Superstar
Joined on: May 9, 2010 6:47:56 GMT -5
Posts: 950
|
Post by cyantist on Dec 17, 2010 14:21:49 GMT -5
You bitch and complain alot. It's for your toys.. Not your promotion.. Really!? I cant have an opinion. Just stop. I think this is the first negative thread I've made on the Mattel board. False. Very false. All WWE rings conform to the same standard. WCW rings were smaller (18 x 18, same as the TNA ring, I believe) but WWE rings are all 20 x 20. Just use a basic spring ring if an actual scaled ring is too big for your needs. Telling silly lies to make yourself feel better about it isn't going to do you any favours. Amen brother.
|
|