|
|
Post by wabarrett on Jan 11, 2011 12:01:55 GMT -5
I can't workout, for the life of me, why people so desperately want the PG era to end. I will admit, Superstars never being able to say son of a bitch or ass does take some intensity out of rivalries, and I will admit that a bit of blood in a big match situation wouldn't be unwelcomed...
But surely the PG era has done us a favour, by getting rid of the kind of crap we used to see when it was TV-14... Mae Young giving birth to a hand; Triple H simulating necrophilia with a doll; Dawn Marie trying to do Torrie Wilson and showing the footage to her dad... I could go on. I think WWE can do without things like that.
Edgy is one thing, I'd welcome more edge... some of the s*** that has happened on WWE television has just been uncomfortable to watch.
|
|
|
|
Post by tonylentelli on Jan 11, 2011 12:07:02 GMT -5
I wish RAW was TV-MA. The raunchier the better.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yeezy's Mullet: Team X Blades on Jan 11, 2011 12:36:24 GMT -5
I wish RAW was TV-MA. The raunchier the better. And what exactly does that have to do with wrestling? Go watch some porn. |
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy on Jan 11, 2011 12:43:39 GMT -5
I also wish WWE was TV-MA but not for sexual content. Basically I would take episodes of The Shield, Mad Men, Breaking Bad, and all sorts of other awesome cable shows and adapt their storylines for RAW.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yeezy's Mullet: Team X Blades on Jan 11, 2011 12:50:56 GMT -5
I also wish WWE was TV-MA but not for sexual content. Basically I would take episodes of The Shield, Mad Men, Breaking Bad, and all sorts of other awesome cable shows and adapt their storylines for RAW. TV-MA wouldn't bother me. But trying to apply a "the raunchier the better" tag line to wrestling is absurd. |
|
|
|
Post by BuckDenaro7: Elite Trader on Jan 11, 2011 13:06:35 GMT -5
I would be fine with raw going back to tv14 but it needs to be done really soon.
|
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Jan 11, 2011 13:18:25 GMT -5
To the ppl who think that PG isn't doing WWE bad, well think again cause it is. This is wrestling where guys are suppose to be tough and competitive and that can bring blood and cursing sometimes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yeezy's Mullet: Team X Blades on Jan 11, 2011 13:25:07 GMT -5
To the ppl who think that PG isn't doing WWE bad, well think again cause it is. This is wrestling where guys are suppose to be tough and competitive and that can bring blood and cursing sometimes. Compelling argument you brought to the table there. |
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Jan 11, 2011 13:28:38 GMT -5
Btw, this was when the WWE Attitude era began.
|
|
wwestevo07
Main Eventer
4 Time WF Ani World Champion
Joined on: Oct 17, 2006 14:15:28 GMT -5
Posts: 1,142
|
Post by wwestevo07 on Jan 11, 2011 13:43:26 GMT -5
Looked to me like the they tried to censor cena saying ass but failed
|
|
|
|
Post by joker123 on Jan 11, 2011 14:09:14 GMT -5
Btw, this was when the WWE Attitude era began. Wow, thank you for your insight. But seriously, cursing and blood don't make good wrestling. If that's all you're bothered about then go watch a poorly-written and acted action film. Or watch TNA. Whatever. |
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Jan 11, 2011 14:29:50 GMT -5
Btw, this was when the WWE Attitude era began. Wow, thank you for your insight. But seriously, cursing and blood don't make good wrestling. If that's all you're bothered about then go watch a poorly-written and acted action film. Or watch TNA. Whatever. No, its sad that they can even say "ass" in the WWE. Its sad that we can't even have fake blood. I'm not saying we need to have porn on raw, but they need to break the rules a little bit. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 30, 2024 2:20:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2011 14:32:57 GMT -5
But he did say ASS...he could have said BUTT...however....he said ASS....not BOOTY....or KEISTER....but ASS I love you and your sig. That is all.  |
|
|
|
Post by Irish Wrestling Entertainment on Jan 11, 2011 17:37:48 GMT -5
Btw, this was when the WWE Attitude era began. Wow, thank you for your insight. But seriously, cursing and blood don't make good wrestling. If that's all you're bothered about then go watch a poorly-written and acted action film. Or watch TNA. Whatever. You're 100% correct. Cursing and blood don't make good wrestling. But they certainly make a much more entertaning product than the current sugar-coated crap that WWE produce. By the way guys, please stop using the 'A' word that Cena said last night in this thread. Some little kids can use the Internet now, and they may be visiting these forums. |
|
|
|
Post by rkokixas on Jan 11, 2011 17:40:44 GMT -5
Did Taker and HBK need blood in their Mania matches for them to be good?
|
|
|
|
Post by ozzytorezwrestling on Jan 11, 2011 17:56:21 GMT -5
I hope it ends. Wrestling is for guys, not kids
|
|
|
|
Post by jfinnomore on Jan 11, 2011 17:56:50 GMT -5
Did Taker and HBK need blood in their Mania matches for them to be good? very fine point. |
|
|
|
Post by Byron F'N Saxton Fan on Jan 11, 2011 19:05:02 GMT -5
Did Taker and HBK need blood in their Mania matches for them to be good? very fine point. That Match actually did have some blood, if I recall. It was accidental and on Undertaker's arm, but that's not really the point. HBK and Undertaker weren't really in a blood feud, and neither were Bryan and Ziggler, to bring up another good Match since Summer 2008. Edge and Undertaker's Cell Match was fine, but the sight of all of Undertaker's hatred coming out and resulting in a blood-covered face for Edge would have been a gripping sight that would have told you it was personal, but instead we get spots that were there to circumvent the lack of blood. Kane/Undertaker, Cena/Batista and Orton, Nexus/WWE and John Cena and Alberto Del Rio/Mysterio were/are all feuds that could have used blood and mature language to enforce the hatred, but instead we get nothing of the kind, which makes it look like just another feud. Gimmick Matches mean so little nowadays, and the least they could do is be the Matches where someone could be busted open, but we don't even get that, and if we do, the Referee and Trainers are there the second a speck of blood appears on a Wrestler to make sure children aren't shocked that something they see on their knee during Recess is on John Cena's face. |
|
|
|
Post by jfinnomore on Jan 11, 2011 19:08:49 GMT -5
That Match actually did have some blood, if I recall. It was accidental and on Undertaker's arm, but that's not really the point. HBK and Undertaker weren't really in a blood feud, and neither were Bryan and Ziggler, to bring up another good Match since Summer 2008. Edge and Undertaker's Cell Match was fine, but the sight of all of Undertaker's hatred coming out and resulting in a blood-covered face for Edge would have been a gripping sight that would have told you it was personal, but instead we get spots that were there to circumvent the lack of blood. Kane/Undertaker, Cena/Batista and Orton, Nexus/WWE and John Cena and Alberto Del Rio/Mysterio were/are all feuds that could have used blood and mature language to enforce the hatred, but instead we get nothing of the kind, which makes it look like just another feud. Gimmick Matches mean so little nowadays, and the least they could do is be the Matches where someone could be busted open, but we don't even get that, and if we do, the Referee and Trainers are there the second a speck of blood appears on a Wrestler to make sure children aren't shocked that something they see on their knee during Recess is on John Cena's face. IDK the Cena/Orton I Quit Match had no blood and was still rather brutal and really had a sadistic feel to it. I think if the spots are done right and weapons are used to an extent it can still give you a feel or real hatred and violence. |
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Jan 11, 2011 19:09:30 GMT -5
I swear we get this thread with the same thread title every week.
|
|
