Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 2:40:05 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2011 19:27:48 GMT -5
Whoever ruled this law constitutional doesn't understand the principals of freedom. This. Man, I'd like to talk politics with you sometime.
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Jan 31, 2011 19:45:23 GMT -5
H I hate to break it to you, but we've had crooked politicians as long as we've had politics. I'd challenge anyone to show me an example from modern or ancient history where they didn't have corrupt politicians. Richard Milhous Nixon. Possibly the most honest politician EVER. He did freely admit that he was not a crook.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 31, 2011 19:49:09 GMT -5
Whoever ruled this law constitutional doesn't understand the principals of freedom. This. Man, I'd like to talk politics with you sometime. As I you.
|
|
|
Post by 1992 on Jan 31, 2011 19:49:30 GMT -5
H Richard Milhous Nixon. Possibly the most honest politician EVER. He did freely admit that he was not a crook. Exactly. And when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal. Simple.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 31, 2011 19:49:56 GMT -5
H Richard Milhous Nixon. Possibly the most honest politician EVER. He did freely admit that he was not a crook. Exactly.
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Jan 31, 2011 19:55:06 GMT -5
Personally, when a politician claims he is not a crook, we should always believe them.
|
|
|
Post by 1992 on Jan 31, 2011 20:05:52 GMT -5
Personally, when a politician claims he is not a crook, we should always believe them. It's your patriotic duty. You're not red now are ya?
|
|
|
Post by extreme on Feb 1, 2011 11:57:49 GMT -5
I'm waiting to see this get tossed out completely. Forcing people to buy a product is BS.
|
|
hbkrules
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
Joined on: Jun 18, 2002 11:49:32 GMT -5
Posts: 2,115
|
Post by hbkrules on Feb 3, 2011 15:59:38 GMT -5
happy dance, no way should the gov have the right to force anyone to buy a product.
|
|
|
Post by TheNinthCloud on Feb 3, 2011 17:00:19 GMT -5
Wait, I thought they ruled in unconstitutional because a part of it wasn't, so they said no to the whole thing.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 3, 2011 17:55:45 GMT -5
Wait, I thought they ruled in unconstitutional because a part of it wasn't, so they said no to the whole thing. The judge just threw out the entire law.
|
|
|
Post by TheNinthCloud on Feb 3, 2011 22:30:53 GMT -5
Wait, I thought they ruled in unconstitutional because a part of it wasn't, so they said no to the whole thing. The judge just threw out the entire law. Judges be crazy.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 3, 2011 22:32:13 GMT -5
A judge in Missouri threw out a challenge to the law that it was unconstitutional.
|
|