|
Post by steveoskillz on Feb 5, 2011 17:28:05 GMT -5
I'm actually quite relived he's not facing Barret, would'nt have gone down in his streak as well as names like HHH, Micheals, ect. And it would've been even worse if he was to end the streak. p.s Taker IS facing a returning Chuck Palumbo.
|
|
|
Post by kahnspiricy on Feb 5, 2011 17:29:27 GMT -5
NEW STING PLAYED BY TYLER BLACK VS UNDERTAKER
HELL YEA BITCHES
|
|
|
Post by heatofthemoment on Feb 5, 2011 17:31:20 GMT -5
NEW STING PLAYED BY TYLER BLACK VS UNDERTAKER HELL YEA BITCHES FIRST WOMAN UNDERTAKER FACES AT MANIA OH THE RECORD BOOKS
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Feb 5, 2011 17:53:29 GMT -5
Right, so this should be taken as proof that Barrett definitely isn't facing The Undertaker at Wrestlemania, and Sting definitely is.
I'm so tired of this crap.
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Feb 5, 2011 19:18:23 GMT -5
Of course, because why wouldn't he spoil the revealing of a major match for Wrestlemania? Logic at it's finest. Well done good sir...well done.
|
|
codebreaker22
Superstar
Best In The World
Joined on: Oct 29, 2010 18:02:55 GMT -5
Posts: 604
|
Post by codebreaker22 on Feb 5, 2011 19:51:02 GMT -5
I'll be happy if this is true, because although I am a big Barrett fan I don't want to see this. To me Barrett just does not feel like a legitimate threat to Taker.
|
|
|
Post by Eat Defeat. on Feb 5, 2011 19:56:13 GMT -5
I never really wanted to see this at WM, good. Maybe another ppv down the line, at least it would be less predictable: if it happens at Mania then obviously Taker would win, the match would be boring.
|
|
|
Post by 3Lephant (Naptown Icon) on Feb 5, 2011 20:03:01 GMT -5
YEAH WHAT DO YOU HATERZ THING OF THIS CRAZY NEWS SCOOP HUH HATERZ STONE COLD STONE COLD STONE COLD
|
|
|
Post by Lewscher on Feb 5, 2011 20:03:12 GMT -5
Wait so since Taker "wont" be facing Barrett you automatically assume it's going to be Taker vs Sting? No more saying That it's more pheasable either way i would have thought it's too soon for him,
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Feb 5, 2011 20:07:08 GMT -5
I really hope Wade doesn't get to face Taker at Mania.
He should be beaten on SD..
No need to give him WM when there is a good chance Sting could face Taker.
|
|
|
Post by joker123 on Feb 5, 2011 20:08:32 GMT -5
|
|
JWC
Main Eventer
JWC'2010-Forever'
Joined on: Sept 27, 2010 18:39:33 GMT -5
Posts: 1,237
|
Post by JWC on Feb 5, 2011 20:21:45 GMT -5
i freaking hate you man. i really do
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 5, 2011 20:25:54 GMT -5
Just because its one source saying he didn't sign with the WWE doesn't mean anything.
|
|
|
Post by joker123 on Feb 5, 2011 20:27:35 GMT -5
Just because its one source saying he didn't sign with the WWE doesn't mean anything. It has a little more substance to it then there being a scorpion carved on the damn house!
|
|
|
Post by JTG on Feb 5, 2011 20:32:10 GMT -5
Okay...just throwing this out there...but does it not make sense that Barrett, a worker for WWE, would try and swerve the audience into thinking he wouldn't be wrestling The Undertaker since the storyline hasn't even begun yet. He wont come right out and say "Yeah, should be a blast wrestling The Undertaker" when the two aren't even in a program yet.
|
|
|
Post by cjskittles4 on Feb 5, 2011 20:45:45 GMT -5
Meltzer, he isn't always right
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 30, 2024 4:32:12 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2011 20:48:57 GMT -5
You people assuming Taker will face Sting are idiots......
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Feb 5, 2011 20:50:30 GMT -5
Sting didn't sign with WWE for years, so why the would he do it now? LOL.
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 5, 2011 21:29:49 GMT -5
Just because its one source saying he didn't sign with the WWE doesn't mean anything. It has a little more substance to it then there being a scorpion carved on the damn house! But that promo screams Sting. I'm sorry.... One thing i heard that scared me. Was that house that the person walked in could be the house Taker and Kane grew up in.
|
|