|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 14, 2011 18:29:21 GMT -5
Yeah, it's WWE's fault people read too much into it and thought it was Sting.... Indeed There's no 2.21.11 thread because you killed it with your Sting talk YF. Seriously dude, there is opinion, and there is obsession, and you are obsessed with it being Sting. Are you trying to get under my skin.....!?!? First of all, that was the first week, whenever sooooo pumped for Sting. And i was just interested in this whole thing. Obsession is over doing it. Its...like... you're trying to get me mad...? But maybe i post about Zack Ryder or his twitter page, i'd be loved.
|
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Feb 14, 2011 18:32:36 GMT -5
Indeed There's no 2.21.11 thread because you killed it with your Sting talk YF. Seriously dude, there is opinion, and there is obsession, and you are obsessed with it being Sting. Are you trying to get under my skin.....!?!? First of all, that was the first week, whenever sooooo pumped for Sting. And i was just interested in this whole thing. Obsession is over doing it. Its...like... you're trying to get me mad...? But maybe i post about Zack Ryder or his twitter page, i'd be loved. No, I'm not "trying to get under your skin". I'm telling you that you are irritating a ton of people. Its not Sting, get over it, or stop being so incessant to others about it and just wait and see what happens. I honestly don't care if you're mad or not, I just wish you would shut up about Sting already, because you seem to have the ability to make intelligent posts, but can't when this whole "2.21.11 conspiracy" is involved. Now, as far as the actual topic goes, Barret vs. Undertaker makes the most sense at this stage of the game. I don't think it will be a great match, but I don't think it will be half bad either, provided Undertaker is mobile enough.
|
|
|
Post by thewrestlecritic on Feb 14, 2011 18:41:00 GMT -5
I have heard rumors that it's going to be HHH vs. Taker with HBK as the ref. If that's the case, then I honestly hope Hunter ends his streak. I know a lot of people don't like him, but I think it would be a great addition to the many achievements he has already accomplished.
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 14, 2011 18:43:26 GMT -5
Are you trying to get under my skin.....!?!? First of all, that was the first week, whenever sooooo pumped for Sting. And i was just interested in this whole thing. Obsession is over doing it. Its...like... you're trying to get me mad...? But maybe i post about Zack Ryder or his twitter page, i'd be loved. No, I'm not "trying to get under your skin". I'm telling you that you are irritating a ton of people. Its not Sting, get over it, or stop being so incessant to others about it and just wait and see what happens. I honestly don't care if you're mad or not, I just wish you would shut up about Sting already, because you seem to have the ability to make intelligent posts, but can't when this whole "2.21.11 conspiracy" is involved. You and others act like i make 5 threads a day about Sting. You just expect me to talk about that because of the 2.21.11 thread. And i was talking about all the Sting talk on...... the 2.21.11 thread where it should be on. And its mostly about the promos. And like i've said before, ppl keep quoting me, and the more they quote i'm gonna answer. There should be nothing wrong with that. Its so odd how everyone gets so mad about this. Also, if the 2.21.11 thread was still alive, i could of just talked all that on there but if it wasn't for members who can't handle a discussion. I don't even make threads on Sting, which you're overreacting about. You just follow what everyone else says.
|
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Feb 14, 2011 18:46:06 GMT -5
No, I'm not "trying to get under your skin". I'm telling you that you are irritating a ton of people. Its not Sting, get over it, or stop being so incessant to others about it and just wait and see what happens. I honestly don't care if you're mad or not, I just wish you would shut up about Sting already, because you seem to have the ability to make intelligent posts, but can't when this whole "2.21.11 conspiracy" is involved. You and others act like i make 5 threads a day about Sting. You just expect me to talk about that because of the 2.21.11 thread. And i was talking about all the Sting talk on...... the 2.21.11 thread where it should be on. And its mostly about the promos. And like i've said before, ppl keep quoting me, and the more they quote i'm gonna answer. There should be nothing wrong with that. Its so odd how everyone gets for this. Also, if the 2.21.11 thread was still alive, i could of just talked all that on there but if it wasn't for members who can't handle a discussion. I don't even make threads on Sting, which you're overreacting about. You just follow what everyone else says. I never said you made threads about Sting. The point is, this had NOTHING to do with Sting, yet here we are still talking about him. Especially the one thread you DID make about the video, and despite everyone telling differently, you refused to listen to any sort of reason. The Triple H vs. Undertaker with HBK as ref intrigues me, but I don't think there's enough buildup time for it. Maybe at WrestleMania 28? Either way, I'm very curious as to just who Undertaker will be facing at my first live WrestleMania! ;D
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 14, 2011 18:49:04 GMT -5
You and others act like i make 5 threads a day about Sting. You just expect me to talk about that because of the 2.21.11 thread. And i was talking about all the Sting talk on...... the 2.21.11 thread where it should be on. And its mostly about the promos. And like i've said before, ppl keep quoting me, and the more they quote i'm gonna answer. There should be nothing wrong with that. Its so odd how everyone gets for this. Also, if the 2.21.11 thread was still alive, i could of just talked all that on there but if it wasn't for members who can't handle a discussion. I don't even make threads on Sting, which you're overreacting about. You just follow what everyone else says. I never said you made threads about Sting. The point is, this had NOTHING to do with Sting, yet here we are still talking about him. Especially the one thread you DID make about the video, and despite everyone telling differently, you refused to listen to any sort of reason. The Triple H vs. Undertaker with HBK as ref intrigues me, but I don't think there's enough buildup time for it. Maybe at WrestleMania 28? Either way, I'm very curious as to just who Undertaker will be facing at my first live WrestleMania! ;D Didn't listen ? Ppl didn't listen to me ! Lol. They just kept bashing me. What was there to listen to ? Besides, i believe in my theory. Just because say so, i'm not gonna follow everyone else. I'm sticking to my guns.
|
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Feb 14, 2011 18:51:35 GMT -5
I never said you made threads about Sting. The point is, this had NOTHING to do with Sting, yet here we are still talking about him. Especially the one thread you DID make about the video, and despite everyone telling differently, you refused to listen to any sort of reason. The Triple H vs. Undertaker with HBK as ref intrigues me, but I don't think there's enough buildup time for it. Maybe at WrestleMania 28? Either way, I'm very curious as to just who Undertaker will be facing at my first live WrestleMania! ;D Didn't listen ? Ppl didn't listen to me ! Lol. They just kept bashing me. What was there to listen to ? Besides, i believe in my theory. Just because say so, i'm not gonna follow everyone else. I'm sticking to my guns. Just cause you believe it, doesn't mean its right Anyone else wondering what Sheamus will do if it is Triple H vs. Undertaker? Cause Sheamus vs. HHH makes a ton of sense, so if he goes against Taker, what will that leave Sheamus to do? MITB? Will there even be a MITB this year? Probably not since there's a PPV, I'd imagine.
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 14, 2011 18:53:21 GMT -5
Didn't listen ? Ppl didn't listen to me ! Lol. They just kept bashing me. What was there to listen to ? Besides, i believe in my theory. Just because say so, i'm not gonna follow everyone else. I'm sticking to my guns. Just cause you believe it, doesn't mean its right Anyone else wondering what Sheamus will do if it is Triple H vs. Undertaker? Cause Sheamus vs. HHH makes a ton of sense, so if he goes against Taker, what will that leave Sheamus to do? MITB? Will there even be a MITB this year? Probably not since there's a PPV, I'd imagine. Not..saying its right. Lol
|
|
|
Post by TheChamp420 on Feb 14, 2011 18:54:39 GMT -5
As much as I like Barrett, there's no chance he'll beat taker, I'd rather see him fight a more formitable opponent, somebody that puts the streak in danger
|
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Feb 14, 2011 18:54:53 GMT -5
Just cause you believe it, doesn't mean its right Anyone else wondering what Sheamus will do if it is Triple H vs. Undertaker? Cause Sheamus vs. HHH makes a ton of sense, so if he goes against Taker, what will that leave Sheamus to do? MITB? Will there even be a MITB this year? Probably not since there's a PPV, I'd imagine. Not..saying its right. Lol Then why even believe it? lol
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 14, 2011 18:57:15 GMT -5
Not..saying its right. Lol Then why even believe it? lol No i believe it. But i'm not trying to get ppl mad because they "HATE" when you feel so confident about who it is.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 30, 2024 4:32:06 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2011 18:58:55 GMT -5
Then why even believe it? lol No i believe it. But i'm not trying to get ppl mad because they "HATE" when you feel so confident about who it is. IT'S. NOT. ING. STING.
|
|
codebreaker22
Superstar
Best In The World
Joined on: Oct 29, 2010 18:02:55 GMT -5
Posts: 604
|
Post by codebreaker22 on Feb 14, 2011 18:58:59 GMT -5
I personally hope this means it will be Cena vs. Taker. And that Morrison will win the Elimination Chamber to face Miz for the title at Mania.
|
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Feb 14, 2011 19:00:06 GMT -5
As much as I like Barrett, there's no chance he'll beat taker, I'd rather see him fight a more formitable opponent, somebody that puts the streak in danger The problem is that by this point, its hard to see ANYONE breaking the streak. The only time I thought it might be possible before the match was when he faced Orton in the Legend vs. Legend Killer match. Since then, its been obvious he would win, with the exception of HBK vs. Taker, but that's because of the match they put on, rather than the setup itself.
|
|