|
|
Post by thephenomenalone on Feb 10, 2011 10:37:41 GMT -5
he Wrestling Observer is reporting that the planned match between The Undertaker and Wade Barrett for WrestleMania has now been scrapped.
The Undertaker is still planned to participate at WrestleMania, and as we've been reporting, his role on the PPV is expected to be very big, and the internal hope is that it will be a major selling point for the PPV.
At this point, Shawn Michaels is expected to play a role in the Undertaker's WrestleMania involvement, however HBK is not expected to wrestle in any capacity.
While The Undertaker's opponent for the big PPV has yet to be revealed, both Sting and Brock Lesnar are reportedly NOT candidates at this time. Lesnar was a dead deal awhile back, and as we've reported Sting and WWE have apparently had no contact with each other regarding a WrestleMania appearance.
|
|
|
|
Post by vertan on Feb 10, 2011 10:38:52 GMT -5
It's gotta be Triple H. I hope this is true, because the Barrett/ Taker match sounds awful.
- Vertan
|
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Feb 10, 2011 10:40:26 GMT -5
Well since Sheamus has been buried every week, we'll probably see Triple H vs Undertaker then. Thats a big name match up that people would see.
|
|
|
|
Post by thephenomenalone on Feb 10, 2011 10:40:49 GMT -5
I was thinking HHH as well , my soul is hoping somehow we'll get HBK v Taker 3 with HBK ending the streak and inducting Taker into the HOF next year...but i am very aware this won't happen =(
|
|
Jacob
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Joined on: May 15, 2006 14:11:26 GMT -5
Posts: 16,577
|
Post by Jacob on Feb 10, 2011 10:50:29 GMT -5
Undertaker vs. Nash, anyone?
|
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Feb 10, 2011 10:55:35 GMT -5
Undertaker vs Triple H or Nash (with HBK as guest referee)?
|
|
|
|
Post by DMO™ on Feb 10, 2011 10:56:13 GMT -5
I want to say HHH, but where does that leave Sheamus?
|
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 10, 2011 10:59:27 GMT -5
I always thought, it would be Undertaker vs Triple H. But now... i don't want that.
|
|
|
|
Post by DMO™ on Feb 10, 2011 11:04:29 GMT -5
I always thought, it would be Undertaker vs Triple H. But now... i don't want that. I think we already know what you want.  |
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 10, 2011 11:26:05 GMT -5
I always thought, it would be Undertaker vs Triple H. But now... i don't want that. I think we already know what you want. ;D i KNOW CHU NO THAT |
|
|
|
Post by Irish Wrestling Entertainment on Feb 10, 2011 12:02:48 GMT -5
It'll likely be Undertaker vs Kane.
|
|
matfin123
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Aug 23, 2010 13:59:25 GMT -5
Posts: 327
|
Post by matfin123 on Feb 10, 2011 12:07:00 GMT -5
i hope it is not taker vs kane the matches they had in late 2010 last year were boring i think it will be HHH vs sheamus so i dont actually no who takerwill be against anymore
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 30, 2024 4:23:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2011 12:12:38 GMT -5
It better not be Taker vs. Kane again. They've already faced off twice at WM and plus they can't work a match together anymore. They're just boring together.
I'm glad they scrapped the plans for him to face Barret. It sounded so awful on paper.
I'm hoping Taker vs. HHH or Taker vs. Nash. Either way Michaels could play a part in both.
|
|
wwestevo07
Main Eventer
4 Time WF Ani World Champion
Joined on: Oct 17, 2006 14:15:28 GMT -5
Posts: 1,142
|
Post by wwestevo07 on Feb 10, 2011 12:15:39 GMT -5
I wouldnt like to see taker take on kane for the third time at WM
Im thinking it will be triple H with HBK trying to get triple H the win
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Feb 10, 2011 12:26:51 GMT -5
In that case, I'm going for either Triple H or Sheamus. I can't see both Undertaker and Triple H Returning at the same time, so it's more likely to be Sheamus.
It must be gutting for Wade Barrett considering all that he had going for him in 2010. It looks like it will simply be The Corre V The New Nexus then. This is what happens when they don't book for the long term and book 2 or 3 weeks behind.
Undertaker V Wade Barrett simply isn't big enough now. It would of been, had Barrett still been the full fledge Leader of the Nexus, and was still dominating Raw. It's literally lost all momentum, people wouldn't care for it.
But, I'm against the idea of HBK being involved in the Match. As much as people would love to see Shawn Michaels at Wrestlemania, there is absolutely no need for him to be involved with the Match what so ever. Undertaker Retired him, and beat him at two consecutive Wrestlemania's. Why come back just to ref the Match.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Feb 10, 2011 12:29:46 GMT -5
In that case, I'm going for either Triple H or Sheamus. I can't see both Undertaker and Triple H Returning at the same time, so it's more likely to be Sheamus. It must be gutting for Wade Barrett considering all that he had going for him in 2010. It looks like it will simply be The Corre V The New Nexus then. This is what happens when they don't book for the long term and book 2 or 3 weeks behind. Booking months ahead would be a stupid idea. Injuries, Fan Reactions, Ratings.. anything could  it up, then they'd be left to change it at last min. Least when they do just book it a few weeks at a time, then they can book to go along with anything that could go wrong. |
|
MikeMillenium
Main Eventer
I LOVE THE WWE AND EVERYTHING ABOUT IT
Joined on: Jul 21, 2010 13:45:54 GMT -5
Posts: 1,622
|
Post by MikeMillenium on Feb 10, 2011 12:49:19 GMT -5
In that case, I'm going for either Triple H or Sheamus. I can't see both Undertaker and Triple H Returning at the same time, so it's more likely to be Sheamus. It must be gutting for Wade Barrett considering all that he had going for him in 2010. It looks like it will simply be The Corre V The New Nexus then. This is what happens when they don't book for the long term and book 2 or 3 weeks behind. Undertaker V Wade Barrett simply isn't big enough now. It would of been, had Barrett still been the full fledge Leader of the Nexus, and was still dominating Raw. It's literally lost all momentum, people wouldn't care for it. But, I'm against the idea of HBK being involved in the Match. As much as people would love to see Shawn Michaels at Wrestlemania, there is absolutely no need for him to be involved with the Match what so ever. Undertaker Retired him, and beat him at two consecutive Wrestlemania's. Why come back just to ref the Match. I don't know if you can be so sure that they don't book long term/for a few weeks. |
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Feb 10, 2011 13:01:15 GMT -5
yep, i'm guessing hbk guest referee, hhh in the match. nash/taker would be slow and botchy as . |
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Feb 10, 2011 13:01:27 GMT -5
I guess HHH gets to lose twice to Taker at WM..
Kinda dumb but I guess it would be a better match than Wade v Taker.
I wonder what Sheamus will do?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Old School™ on Feb 10, 2011 13:06:43 GMT -5
Thank ing god they scrapped the match with Barrett. It would have been WAY too obvious that 'Taker was going to win that one. I mean seriously...'Taker beats some of the best guys ever in the business like Flair, HBK, Orton, Batista, Diesel, Sycho Sid, Triple H and others like King Kong Bundy, Jimmy Snuka, and Jake Roberts and people were supposed to believe that after 'Taker beat those guys that Barrett actually stood a chance?? Give me a friggin' break. Not happening. I don't care who you put in there with 'Taker, he's gonna win no matter what. He's got to make it 20-0 and then retire. |
|
