|
Post by Gazza on Feb 15, 2011 12:29:52 GMT -5
This isn't a let down at all. People knew the chances were thin for it to be Sting in the first place. I don't get it. Still not a letdown to me. Its not 2.21.11 yet You'll be let down on 2.21.11 then, when it's just Taker.
|
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Feb 15, 2011 12:32:58 GMT -5
Still not a letdown to me. Its not 2.21.11 yet You'll be let down on 2.21.11 then, when it's just Taker. He shouldn't be, because WWE never promised Sting, he just imagined it. I go away for an hour and come back and we're STILL talking about Sting, even after the HBK/Taker thread got shut down? Good lord. Its Undertaker, move along people.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Feb 15, 2011 12:36:34 GMT -5
This isn't a let down at all. People knew the chances were thin for it to be Sting in the first place. I don't get it. Still not a letdown to me. Its not 2.21.11 yet Wow dude, and I thought I was persistent with the whole Daniel Bryan released thing, LOL.
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Feb 15, 2011 12:38:40 GMT -5
To be honest people was just asking to be let down by looking into all these fake clues and believing them. It was bound to happen.
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 15, 2011 12:42:51 GMT -5
They can't show obvious objects to make it look like Sting. They can't show a bat, or the person side face being white. Its a surprise. This is a big deal. If the WWE is bringing in Sting, they're gonna do it big.
Or it can be Triple H. Because the person was holding something on his shoulder.So idk if its a bat or sledge hammer
|
|
|
Post by Yeezy's Mullet: Team X Blades on Feb 15, 2011 12:43:46 GMT -5
Wait. Are you guys actually turning this on us, claiming that we're not sincere wrestling fans because we didn't want to believe? Don't get mad at us because you guys refuse to accept the obvious. This board went to hell a long time ago, so don't try and call the thinkers of this place out for ruining it.
No one ever bashed anyone for beliving it was Sting at first. People got upset because of how over the top it got, how it spilled over into every single thread, and how despite seeing an obvious image of Taker, people still won't let it go.
|
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Feb 15, 2011 12:44:30 GMT -5
They can't show obvious objects to make it look like Sting. They can't show a bat, or the person side face being white. Its a surprise. This is a big deal. If the WWE is bringing in Sting, they're gonna do it big. I think you missed a word in what you just said. IF If they do it will be big, yes, I agree. But they're not.
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 15, 2011 12:45:59 GMT -5
They can't show obvious objects to make it look like Sting. They can't show a bat, or the person side face being white. Its a surprise. This is a big deal. If the WWE is bringing in Sting, they're gonna do it big. I think you missed a word in what you just said. IF If they do it will be big, yes, I agree. But they're not. I said "if" ...
|
|
Jorden
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 22, 2008 1:36:35 GMT -5
Posts: 1,607
|
Post by Jorden on Feb 15, 2011 12:46:29 GMT -5
The people calling this a letdown are ridiculous. Why is it a letdown? Because you let yourself get completely and ridiculously immersed in a rumor that had no legs within the first five minutes of seeing one of these videos? That's your fault. WWE NEVER advertised or hinted at Sting or anyone else, it was all you.. So, if it's a "letdown" then you've no one to blame but yourself unfortunately.
|
|
|
Post by Himmy! on Feb 15, 2011 12:46:33 GMT -5
Oh well! Still happy Undertaker's coming back.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 31, 2024 18:36:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2011 12:47:52 GMT -5
|
|
HoganBai
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 15, 2004 15:06:24 GMT -5
Posts: 4,682
|
Post by HoganBai on Feb 15, 2011 12:48:52 GMT -5
One thing that the "you guys are stupid, of course it was Undertaker" guys don't seem to be saying is that WHY was there such a mystery and build up. Undertaker was the most realistic choice to begin with, and yeah everyone got their hopes up so you were right - but this is completely unlike any Undertaker return build-up we've seen.
The western theme, the fact we see him yet the promos are all refering to something happening on the date, the overall "feel" of the promos, is there somebody outside. Yeah, Undertaker's back on Monday but I think there is something more to it, not Sting, probably not HBK but there is SOMETHING more to this then just Undertaker is back. And THAT will be the letdown if Undertaker does just show up - we've seen Undertaker returns SOOOOOO many times, there must be something to make THIS return more interesting, it's simple.
*EDIT* This thread was originally just to show the WWE's goof. The letdown is what sparked a lot of intrigue and mystery (regardless as to who it was - the first promo was like the first Save US promo, it came out of nowhere) is just going to turn out to be Undertaker return 101
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Feb 15, 2011 12:49:05 GMT -5
The people calling this a letdown are ridiculous. Why is it a letdown? Because you let yourself get completely and ridiculously immersed in a rumor that had no legs within the first five minutes of seeing one of these videos? That's your fault. WWE NEVER advertised or hinted at Sting or anyone else, it was all you.. So, if it's a "letdown" then you've no one to blame but yourself unfortunately. Glad to see others have common sense.
|
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Feb 15, 2011 12:53:41 GMT -5
I think you missed a word in what you just said. IF If they do it will be big, yes, I agree. But they're not. I said "if" ... I said you missed a word in what you SAID. You said if it is Sting, it will be big. The problem is, you keep acting like it IS Sting, when it CLEARLY has nothing to do with him. Its just Undertaker.... again... for the umpteenth time in 5 years
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 15, 2011 13:02:33 GMT -5
These promos are trying to tell us something. YES ITS THE UNDERTAKER. A 4 year old would of figure that out.
But this has to be more to it. Why can't they just show the person in the trench coats face ?? Why they only show Taker face and chest. Something the person in the trench coat hasn't shown.
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Feb 15, 2011 13:04:18 GMT -5
These promos are trying to tell us something. YES ITS THE UNDERTAKER. A 4 year old would of figure that out. But this has to be more to it. Why can't they just show the person in the trench coats face ?? Why they only show Taker face and chest. Something the person in the trench coat hasn't shown. .....because undertaker IS the person in the trench coat.
|
|
|
Post by Yeezy's Mullet: Team X Blades on Feb 15, 2011 13:07:28 GMT -5
These promos are trying to tell us something. YES ITS THE UNDERTAKER. A 4 year old would of figure that out. But this has to be more to it. Why can't they just show the person in the trench coats face ?? Why they only show Taker face and chest. Something the person in the trench coat hasn't shown. You have got to be kidding me.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 31, 2024 18:36:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2011 13:09:19 GMT -5
ok deff 2 ppl in the 3 promo it you look at 40 seconds its go to someone out side and just as he takes his first step look at the window to the left of the body but on the right side of the window ....just to be clear i dont think its sting i think its HHH or HBK or both maybe the return of DX???
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 15, 2011 13:12:41 GMT -5
These promos are trying to tell us something. YES ITS THE UNDERTAKER. A 4 year old would of figure that out. But this has to be more to it. Why can't they just show the person in the trench coats face ?? Why they only show Taker face and chest. Something the person in the trench coat hasn't shown. .....because undertaker IS the person in the trench coat. No its not. I don't why people just don't try a little.... lol. I mean, ok, if you think its just Taker. Fine. But, just think about this a little.
|
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Feb 15, 2011 13:15:37 GMT -5
These promos are trying to tell us something. YES ITS THE UNDERTAKER. A 4 year old would of figure that out. But this has to be more to it. Why can't they just show the person in the trench coats face ?? Why they only show Taker face and chest. Something the person in the trench coat hasn't shown. You have got to be kidding me. Here's the thing. Undertaker shows up so many times, if they say 'TUNE IN TO SEE THE UNDERTAKER RETURN!!!" Most people will go "Again? Meh..." You show something more mysterious and less direct, more people will tune in. The problem is, so many people thought it was Sting, they HAD to be a bit more specific with where they were going with it, just so they wouldn't get their hopes up.
|
|