|
Dejavu?
Feb 26, 2011 12:02:45 GMT -5
Post by The Undertaker on Feb 26, 2011 12:02:45 GMT -5
TNA is an overall better company than WWE. From a production and business standpoint. Check yourself into a mental facility. Immediately.
|
|
|
Dejavu?
Feb 26, 2011 12:05:45 GMT -5
Post by ASR (therockisback) on Feb 26, 2011 12:05:45 GMT -5
^ LMAO that austin gif is legendary
all you tna fans are just old angry attitude era fans who hate wwe for being pg so you watch tna as a attitude era version 2 or you are bitter wwe fans and are angry that vince put wcw out of business and won the monday night wars so you watch tna as wcw version 2 or ecw version 2
they have some great talent but dont use them. look at there world champ a washed up 52 year old and before that? a junky and before that? a fired wwe superstar and before that? a 40 year old who is a former wwe ecw superstar. who will be the next tna champ? fatt hardy? hogan flair bischoff russo?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 0:56:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Dejavu?
Feb 26, 2011 12:23:26 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2011 12:23:26 GMT -5
TNA is an overall better company than WWE. From a production and business standpoint. LMAO! Delusional TNA fan is delusional. LOL obvious joke is obvious.
|
|
|
Dejavu?
Feb 26, 2011 13:58:42 GMT -5
Post by Joey Cush on Feb 26, 2011 13:58:42 GMT -5
i really cant take TNA serious anymore. People claim its a parody? A parody is making fun something, TNA was totally serious. They are a joke of a company and is run by ing morons. Yeah, Biggest Shocker of the Year huh? At least TNA does something regularly, that is being the ultimate let down week in and week out. But of course, TNA fanboys will defend this, like always. Because they are probably half intellectually- disabled, whatever...
|
|
|
Dejavu?
Feb 26, 2011 14:01:37 GMT -5
Post by slappy on Feb 26, 2011 14:01:37 GMT -5
Their shocking surprise was a joke, literally.
|
|
|
Dejavu?
Feb 26, 2011 14:04:26 GMT -5
Post by cjskittles4 on Feb 26, 2011 14:04:26 GMT -5
TNA is an overall better company than WWE. From a production and business standpoint. Maybe not business wise but TNA have most certaintly got better talent and television. Especially the main event and tag team divisions. TNA do alot of stuff better than WWE... TNA's tag division is overrated as The only relevant teams are Beer Money, Ink Inc., Gunner and Murphy and EY and OJ Gen Me are lost in the shuffle, and the MCMG are Sure the tag division in TNA is better, but not that much better The Main Event Picture is a cluster dude And TNA seems to have forgotten how to do good television. It's been a few of years since the TNA product could put up any kind of argument as to being better than WWE's. In fact that was in mid 2006
|
|
|
Dejavu?
Feb 26, 2011 14:36:29 GMT -5
Post by wabarrett on Feb 26, 2011 14:36:29 GMT -5
What's TNA?
|
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Dejavu?
Feb 26, 2011 14:57:47 GMT -5
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Feb 26, 2011 14:57:47 GMT -5
TNA is an overall better company than WWE. From a production and business standpoint. I like TNA and had no problem with the 3.3.11 promo as a nice little parody (since a lot of folks NOT on here other than one or two kept saying it would be Sting and what not), but even I can say what the heck are you smoking? lol WWE is FAR superior business and production wise. That doesn't mean TNA is bad (necessarilly, all comes down to personal opinion of course), but to say BETTER than WWE with its millions and millions of dollars, sponsors and investors... that's not a very wise statement. In their defense, Gen Me were supposed to challenge for the number one contender spot for the X Title, then travel issues kept that from happening, and from there, who knows what's going on, I will agree. And as for MCMG, Alex Shelley is injured, so not much TNA can do about that.
|
|
|
Dejavu?
Feb 26, 2011 15:03:51 GMT -5
Post by mrrocky619 on Feb 26, 2011 15:03:51 GMT -5
so far, only one person has said stong u ppl sicken me...
|
|
|
Dejavu?
Feb 26, 2011 15:21:01 GMT -5
Post by Gazza on Feb 26, 2011 15:21:01 GMT -5
TNA is an overall better company than WWE. From a production and business standpoint. Then you know nothing about production or business.
|
|
|
Dejavu?
Feb 26, 2011 15:50:26 GMT -5
Post by ✖ AJ on Feb 26, 2011 15:50:26 GMT -5
TNA is an overall better company than WWE. From a production and business standpoint.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 0:56:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Dejavu?
Feb 26, 2011 15:50:30 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2011 15:50:30 GMT -5
Maybe not business wise but TNA have most certaintly got better talent and television. Especially the main event and tag team divisions. TNA do alot of stuff better than WWE... TNA's tag division is overrated as The only relevant teams are Beer Money, Ink Inc., Gunner and Murphy and EY and OJ Gen Me are lost in the shuffle, and the MCMG are Sure the tag division in TNA is better, but not that much better The Main Event Picture is a cluster dude And TNA seems to have forgotten how to do good television. It's been a few of years since the TNA product could put up any kind of argument as to being better than WWE's. In fact that was in mid 2006 Alex Shelley is injured and Gen Me are having a run in the X Division
|
|
|
Dejavu?
Feb 26, 2011 17:00:59 GMT -5
Post by DMO™ on Feb 26, 2011 17:00:59 GMT -5
TNA is an overall better company than WWE. From a production and business standpoint.
|
|
|
Dejavu?
Feb 26, 2011 17:55:19 GMT -5
Post by cjskittles4 on Feb 26, 2011 17:55:19 GMT -5
TNA's tag division is overrated as The only relevant teams are Beer Money, Ink Inc., Gunner and Murphy and EY and OJ Gen Me are lost in the shuffle, and the MCMG are Sure the tag division in TNA is better, but not that much better The Main Event Picture is a cluster dude And TNA seems to have forgotten how to do good television. It's been a few of years since the TNA product could put up any kind of argument as to being better than WWE's. In fact that was in mid 2006 Alex Shelley is injured and Gen Me are having a run in the X Division What X-Division? Sabin's an incredible wrestler, and they have to wait for his partner to heal? Hell, they could add him to this "X-Division" that you speak of
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 18, 2024 0:56:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Dejavu?
Feb 26, 2011 17:57:54 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2011 17:57:54 GMT -5
I used to love TNA, and thought I'd never say this but, WWE > TNA.
Oh and that 3-3-11 vid, is probably the most intellectually- disabled thing they've ever done.
|
|
|
Dejavu?
Feb 26, 2011 18:25:49 GMT -5
Post by v/\v on Feb 26, 2011 18:25:49 GMT -5
TNA as a company and product is dead to me. Just nothing. I care about the goodness still in TNA like Kurt, BMoney, AJ on his better days and Des Wolfe but the shows and vibe and everything else is kafkaesque.
Sting still being there is bewildering - like he could just retire and stonewall E forever too, anybody wanting any part of the way they run is bewildering.
|
|
|
Dejavu?
Feb 26, 2011 18:29:12 GMT -5
Post by HugoOne on Feb 26, 2011 18:29:12 GMT -5
I don't see it but it's cool that some people do.
|
|
|
Dejavu?
Feb 26, 2011 18:36:08 GMT -5
Post by stonecold316 on Feb 26, 2011 18:36:08 GMT -5
to paraphrase a quote/tweet on dixie's page, "take off TNA, & put on ROH!!!"
|
|
|
Dejavu?
Feb 26, 2011 18:36:16 GMT -5
Post by hollywoodscene on Feb 26, 2011 18:36:16 GMT -5
Dejavu is a double rotation headscissors
|
|
|
Dejavu?
Feb 26, 2011 18:40:58 GMT -5
Post by johnnypoopypants on Feb 26, 2011 18:40:58 GMT -5
It wasn't a rip-off, it was a parody. I hate to agree with you but yeah this is obviously supposed to be referencing WWE's video. or maybe tna is just intellectually- disabled. very possible.
|
|