|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 15, 2011 17:32:55 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 22:34:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2011 17:33:58 GMT -5
It's because of Snooki, not the Must Pee Champion.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 15, 2011 17:35:30 GMT -5
Grandmaster Sexay = Ratings
|
|
|
|
Post by jbarqu88 on Mar 15, 2011 17:39:54 GMT -5
Grandmaster Sexay = Ratings I've been saying that for years. |
|
|
|
Post by DMO™ on Mar 15, 2011 17:40:03 GMT -5
"The Must Pee Champion was advertised for the show thats why the rating is down from last week also because all of Orton's St.Lous fans were at the arena and couldn't contribute to the TV rating"
|
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Mar 15, 2011 17:40:30 GMT -5
That Rock segment did a 10.1, easy, for the first hour! the 2nd hour did a .03. I'm no math-magician but that makes sense to me.  |
|
|
|
Post by johnnydirtbag on Mar 15, 2011 17:41:34 GMT -5
It's because the smart WWE fans knew that jobber Ryder could possibly have a segment with Snooki.
Man, that dude is such a jobber.
|
|
|
|
Post by jbarqu88 on Mar 15, 2011 17:42:58 GMT -5
It's because the smart WWE fans knew that jobber Ryder could possibly have a segment with Snooki. Man, that dude is such a jobber. You really are a Dirtbag, aren't you?  ;D |
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Mar 15, 2011 17:43:34 GMT -5
It's because the smart WWE fans knew that jobber Ryder could possibly have a segment with Snooki. Man, that dude is such a jobber. Long Island Iced Z said it himself. He's helping the economy, by doing all the jobs. |
|
|
|
Post by kahnspiricy on Mar 15, 2011 18:32:45 GMT -5
Randy Orton caused ratings drop.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Mar 15, 2011 18:38:16 GMT -5
Randy Orton caused ratings drop. But I thought everyone turned Raw off after Orton had been on  |
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Mar 15, 2011 18:39:15 GMT -5
Can't wait to see the quarter ratings to see who gained viewers and who dropped viewers.
|
|
|
|
Post by breakthewallsdown on Mar 15, 2011 18:46:02 GMT -5
Can't wait to see the quarter ratings to see who gained viewers and who dropped viewers. haha dude that pic in ur sig is awesome |
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Mar 15, 2011 19:22:59 GMT -5
Not bad but it was not as great as previous weeks.  |
|
|
|
Post by oriolesfan4life on Mar 15, 2011 20:00:33 GMT -5
I dont get all this Miz and Orton talk in here but I did see that the 2nd hour did have more viewers than the 1st one if that helps. And Orton was in the 2nd hour and Miz was in the 1st one(and the overrun which always has a good # ratings wise).
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 15, 2011 20:14:08 GMT -5
I dont get all this Miz and Orton talk in here but I did see that the 2nd hour did have more viewers than the 1st one if that helps. And Orton was in the 2nd hour and Miz was in the 1st one(and the overrun which always has a good # ratings wise). You aren't even trying to hide who you really are are you? |
|
|
|
Post by DMO™ on Mar 15, 2011 20:17:30 GMT -5
I dont get all this Miz and Orton talk in here but I did see that the 2nd hour did have more viewers than the 1st one if that helps. And Orton was in the 2nd hour and Miz was in the 1st one(and the overrun which always has a good # ratings wise). You aren't even trying to hide who you really are are you? Stong? Last night’s episode of Monday Night Raw scored a 3.7 cable rating, down from the previous week’s 3.92. It did hours of 3.55 and 3.74. |
|
|
|
Post by HugoOne on Mar 15, 2011 20:32:31 GMT -5
I dont get all this Miz and Orton talk in here but I did see that the 2nd hour did have more viewers than the 1st one if that helps. And Orton was in the 2nd hour and Miz was in the 1st one(and the overrun which always has a good # ratings wise). You aren't even trying to hide who you really are are you? lmfao, LOVE IT.  |
|
|
|
Post by oriolesfan4life on Mar 15, 2011 21:36:24 GMT -5
What are you talking about? All I did was give more info on the subject at hand.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 22:34:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 16, 2011 9:07:55 GMT -5
What are you talking about? All I did was give more info on the subject at hand. Oh come on now. |
|
