|
|
Post by rko88 on Jun 30, 2007 22:10:35 GMT -5
So i was watchin a bio on Hogan and got to thinking that thats what TNA keeps trying to get. Just like WCW they want that TOP ELITE guy that they stole from WWE. So Who in your guys opion do you think could do that.Make a BIG impact(no pun intended) and basically totally change TNA. They Tried Sting,Angle,Cage you can even say Team 3D...So once again who do you think from WWE old or new who could actaully switch it around for them?
|
|
|
|
Post by wwemark1 on Jun 30, 2007 22:39:19 GMT -5
They didn't steal anyone. I don't understand where you people get that. WWE fired them or released them or they quit. They was free & TNA signed them. They was fair game. One of the Bashams work for IWA-MS (I think that's the one) but you don't hear "They stole them from WWE" do you? No.
|
|
|
|
Post by Heresy on Jun 30, 2007 22:52:06 GMT -5
First off, when WCW signed WWE/ECW guys, they reinvented their characters. TNA 'copy-and-pastes' former WWE/WCW/ECW guys onto their roster. Why? Because TNA is more concerned with preserving individual name-value/gimmicks than creating an identity for itself like WCW did. Taking that into account, TNA won't turn itself around by signing another big name and throwing them in the main event as is. What TNA needs to do is create its own identity and stop leaching off of past promotions' ideas and gimmicks... maybe then TNA will start to garner more interest. But right now, TNA is more "Look who we've got" than "Look what we have to show you"...
|
|
|
|
Post by comebackkid on Jun 30, 2007 22:54:30 GMT -5
First off, when WCW signed WWE/ECW guys, they reinvented their characters. TNA 'copy-and-pastes' former WWE/WCW/ECW guys onto their roster. Why? Because TNA is more concerned with preserving individual name-value/gimmicks than creating an identity for itself like WCW did. Taking that into account, TNA won't turn itself around by signing another big name and throwing them in the main event as is. What TNA needs to do is create its own identity and stop leaching off of past promotions' ideas and gimmicks... maybe then TNA will start to garner more interest. But right now, TNA is more "Look who we've got" than "Look what we have to show you"... Thats why this man is my tag partner |
|
|
|
Post by Flava Dave on Jun 30, 2007 22:58:00 GMT -5
I could only see them making a huge impact in ratings is if they signed someone like John Cena. I don't know of any other current superstar that would garner as much of the mainstream demographic as he most likely would.
|
|
capncharisma
Main Eventer
Because they are Nexus, and they're AWESOME!
Joined on: Jul 6, 2005 0:11:54 GMT -5
Posts: 1,264
|
Post by capncharisma on Jul 1, 2007 12:52:48 GMT -5
i think its fine. im sure they are getting new fans weekly. hell i've been caring more about tna than wwe lately.
|
|
|
|
Post by taihyll on Jul 1, 2007 14:59:29 GMT -5
Unlesss they get HHH(which obviously wont happen) no names will change the face of TNA. They need to work on there actual product instead
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 23, 2024 10:31:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2007 15:18:59 GMT -5
ROH is like WCW
|
|
|
|
Post by manstration on Jul 1, 2007 17:08:15 GMT -5
No matter how many times you say that, it doesn't make it true. Is it like the Crockett Era NWA? Maybe. WCW? No. |
|
|
|
Post by Eyce on Jul 2, 2007 1:41:53 GMT -5
TNA is like WCW.
Except, people actually watched WCW.
|
|
|
|
Post by THE *Legendary* STINGER on Jul 2, 2007 3:46:37 GMT -5
First off, when WCW signed WWE/ECW guys, they reinvented their characters. TNA 'copy-and-pastes' former WWE/WCW/ECW guys onto their roster. Why? Because TNA is more concerned with preserving individual name-value/gimmicks than creating an identity for itself like WCW did. Taking that into account, TNA won't turn itself around by signing another big name and throwing them in the main event as is. What TNA needs to do is create its own identity and stop leaching off of past promotions' ideas and gimmicks... maybe then TNA will start to garner more interest. But right now, TNA is more "Look who we've got" than "Look what we have to show you"... beautifully put. |
|
|
|
Post by specterkev on Jul 3, 2007 3:26:25 GMT -5
IMO noone will make TNA big until they get a two hour time slot.
|
|
|
|
Post by voltage123 on Jul 3, 2007 3:32:56 GMT -5
Shawn Michaels, The Rock, and maybe Goldberg
|
|
Nitro
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 29, 2006 18:50:40 GMT -5
Posts: 3,839
|
Post by Nitro on Jul 3, 2007 16:55:16 GMT -5
I think TNA should re-package their whole image..
the impact zone looks so cheap and small plus theirs adverts everywere you look
and whats the point in two entrance stages that dont even look good?
the list goes on and on...
|
|
