|
Post by TheChamp617 on Mar 21, 2011 15:22:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by wabarrett on Mar 21, 2011 15:27:04 GMT -5
It could work. Next lets see Joe Hennig actually be Joe Hennig and not McSillysurname.
|
|
|
Post by DMO™ on Mar 21, 2011 15:41:48 GMT -5
It's....ummm... different? he looks like he just came out of a 1997 ECW match.
|
|
|
Post by Kyle - legendkilla2k9 on Mar 21, 2011 15:42:55 GMT -5
Damn.
We've already got one talentless, piece of fat crap on the roster.
(Brodus Clay)
|
|
|
Post by OverTheEdge on Mar 21, 2011 15:43:17 GMT -5
Not a fan of that look at all.
|
|
|
Post by darksoul on Mar 21, 2011 15:55:43 GMT -5
I think it's pretty cool but it's obvious, the character is in it's early stages and hasn't been touched up by the WWE creative staff. So it will be interesting to see what the costume and gimmick will be like when he debuts back on the main roster.
|
|
Sonnen
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 16, 2010 8:42:36 GMT -5
Posts: 3,261
|
Post by Sonnen on Mar 21, 2011 15:56:21 GMT -5
Ah I see he is going to be using the "indy worker" gimmick.
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Mar 21, 2011 16:01:32 GMT -5
He better not use the Stunner on TV if he ever makes it back (which I think is doubtful).
|
|
|
Post by chaz on Mar 21, 2011 16:03:38 GMT -5
He looks like a fat ing idiot.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 21, 2011 16:15:17 GMT -5
Damn. We've already got one talentless, piece of fat crap on the roster. (Brodus Clay) lol no. Brodus is actually really good. Especially on the mic.
|
|
The Stranger
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 21, 2007 1:09:47 GMT -5
Posts: 2,200
|
Post by The Stranger on Mar 21, 2011 16:17:20 GMT -5
Reminds me of a shitty Attitude era gimmick. It'll probably never make it to TV.
|
|
|
Post by juicewinslow on Mar 21, 2011 16:28:39 GMT -5
I like it I guess.
No one besides Austin should use the Stunner though. That is just dumb.
|
|
|
Post by Calcifer Boheme on Mar 21, 2011 16:29:00 GMT -5
I like the name a lot, just not the look. I was all for him in the trunks and cowboy boots. He looked different than everyone else and could move. this gimmick just doesn't look like it will work out.
Oh well, we'll see if it ever makes TV. Even if it doesn't, I hope he comes back. I love the fact that we were getting more bulky guys on TV.
|
|
|
Post by wabarrett on Mar 21, 2011 16:29:42 GMT -5
Damn. We've already got one talentless, piece of fat crap on the roster. (Brodus Clay) lol no. Brodus is actually really good. Especially on the mic. lol no.
|
|
zombiesnake
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Feb 23, 2011 17:15:34 GMT -5
Posts: 271
|
Post by zombiesnake on Mar 21, 2011 16:40:55 GMT -5
Like the name, but the look is awful. Give him his old look and move set with the new name.
|
|
|
Post by juicewinslow on Mar 21, 2011 16:46:44 GMT -5
He should be called 'Husky Mulligan'. Husky is a good name in my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by gordon on Mar 21, 2011 16:53:01 GMT -5
lol no. Brodus is actually really good. Especially on the mic. lol no. He is good on the mic. In the ring....not so much.
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Mar 21, 2011 16:54:56 GMT -5
No..
No one but SCSA should use the Stunner as a finisher in wwe for at least a long time to come.
And if they really want to give it to someone let it be someone who is good!
|
|
|
Post by the franchise on Mar 21, 2011 17:06:24 GMT -5
That is different.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 27, 2024 14:03:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2011 17:18:27 GMT -5
Like the name, but the look is awful. Give him his old look and move set with the new name. I agree with this statement. I liked when he used the "Knox Out" as his finisher for like, a week.
|
|