|
Post by mrindy on Nov 20, 2007 16:03:27 GMT -5
Attitude
|
|
|
Post by taker1 on Nov 20, 2007 19:05:59 GMT -5
Without the nWo era, the Attitude Era would have never happened..
|
|
|
Post by The Assassin on Nov 24, 2007 13:58:26 GMT -5
nWo by FAR
who the hell is voting for the attitude era?
like T1 said, WCW/nWo was the "first attitude era" in wrestling
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Nov 24, 2007 14:33:17 GMT -5
I gotta give it to the early nWo...Ive watched wrestling every monday night since primetime wrestling but when the nwo started i turned it off raw and started watching Nitro. Another reason i saw nWo is watch the Monday night wars on 24/7 or old raw/nitro tapes if you have them. Count how many Austin 316 shirts you see in the NITRO crowd (even later on when Raw was getting better ratings) and then count and see how many nWo shirts were in the Raw Crowd.....There was twice as many nWo shirts....EVERYBODY had one
|
|
KRAYZIE BONE
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
Visual.Avenues
Joined on: Jul 20, 2003 22:29:25 GMT -5
Posts: 1,608
|
Post by KRAYZIE BONE on Nov 24, 2007 16:42:20 GMT -5
nwo/wcw > wwf
|
|
Dwight
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 10, 2007 11:02:46 GMT -5
Posts: 2,686
|
Post by Dwight on Nov 27, 2007 6:40:33 GMT -5
Being "the first attitude" doesnt mean its the better of the two. Which it wasn't.
|
|
|
Post by Groundswell on Nov 27, 2007 11:50:22 GMT -5
Attitude obviously, WCW was a terrible product, Kinda like TNA is now.
|
|
|
Post by Iron Man on Nov 27, 2007 12:04:47 GMT -5
Well it depends, nWo Era sure as hell made more of an impact and changed everything but got very stale a few months after. The Attitude Era was great the whole time it lasted, new stars, good matches, great feuds...
But i guess I might be a bit bias as I only watched WWF, but I am currently watching WCW nitro on 24/7 and it is really cool and I still never know what happens as I never watched or followed WCW, but it is getting old really fast in 1997.
|
|