|
Post by James Hetfield on Jun 4, 2011 22:17:56 GMT -5
Guida is a joke. Master of Stalling. Guida just lost a fan.
|
|
Sonnen
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 16, 2010 8:42:36 GMT -5
Posts: 3,261
|
Post by Sonnen on Jun 4, 2011 22:18:57 GMT -5
Guida is a joke. Master of Stalling. Guida just lost a fan. I'm sure he is devastated.
|
|
PdW2kX
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 8, 2007 23:34:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,551
|
Post by PdW2kX on Jun 4, 2011 22:42:53 GMT -5
Well, I'm glad Ferguson won. He shows a lot of promise and I think it's going to be very interesting to see how far he can go if he keeps winning.
All in all, this show felt pretty average to me. Some good fights, some average, some boring. Nothing to really write home about, other than the supremely underwhelming co-main. I don't even care that Pettis lost, this is one of those fights where I wished neither one had to lose, but this fight just fell so far short of my expectations that I'm left very let down.
|
|
|
Post by 1992 on Jun 4, 2011 22:52:09 GMT -5
Guida vs Pettis: "The Wrestle Heard Round the World"
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Jun 4, 2011 23:28:23 GMT -5
The hate Guida is getting is sad.
|
|
PdW2kX
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 8, 2007 23:34:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,551
|
Post by PdW2kX on Jun 4, 2011 23:45:50 GMT -5
I disagree wholeheartedly Nick, which is a rare thing.
Guida had a few good moments, but for the most part, he lived up to the worst criticisms of Greg Jackson fighters. He constantly shot for and got the takedown, then proceeded to do virtually nothing except lay on top and hammer with pillow hands.
You're honestly telling me that the Clay Guida we saw tonight was the one that won over so many fans? No way it was.
|
|
PrideFcF
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 7, 2008 13:26:21 GMT -5
Posts: 3,807
|
Post by PrideFcF on Jun 5, 2011 1:13:14 GMT -5
This fight was definitely bland, but still the sudden Guida hate is indeed rather odd. He finished his last 3 opponents, then had this one uneventful fight. Now he's a joke and the king of stalling/lay-n-pray/wrestlef*cking? Come on now.
|
|
hammer
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 12, 2009 2:30:31 GMT -5
Posts: 2,619
|
Post by hammer on Jun 5, 2011 1:14:25 GMT -5
i didnt think guida/pettis was THAT bad. it wasnt a jon fitch lay n pray. guida tried to lnp, sure, but pettis kept battling off his back for submissions, and guida kept escaping. it wasnt anything near what i expected, but i wasnt bored.
fergusons ko was BRUTAL. ramsey stiffened up while he was still standing up.
and kingsbury/maldonado was real fun too. somebody compared the fighters bodies, and if that was the way fights were judged, it shouldve been a blowout. maldonado impressed me too though, those were some stiff body shots.
|
|
MuffFuzz
Main Eventer
Where is he?!
Joined on: Feb 21, 2004 14:56:16 GMT -5
Posts: 2,995
|
Post by MuffFuzz on Jun 5, 2011 1:23:04 GMT -5
Meh, was decent at best. But hey, it was free right?
Ferguson's KO of Ramsey was sick. Yeah, he was a douche on the show but I wish him well and can't wait to see what he does in the future.
Guida did what he had to do to win. I was rooting for Pettis, but after the first round I figured he was going to get grinded out.
Can't wait for next weekend though!
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Old School™ on Jun 5, 2011 1:52:10 GMT -5
So, if Guida is a joke, then what does that make the guy that just lost to him??
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Jun 5, 2011 2:14:59 GMT -5
I disagree wholeheartedly Nick, which is a rare thing. Guida had a few good moments, but for the most part, he lived up to the worst criticisms of Greg Jackson fighters. He constantly shot for and got the takedown, then proceeded to do virtually nothing except lay on top and hammer with pillow hands. You're honestly telling me that the Clay Guida we saw tonight was the one that won over so many fans? No way it was. No, he wasn't the "exciting" fighter that we've been hyping and the fight didn't live up to the hype, either... But I've been reading people saying that they should cut Clay Guida after his performance tonight. He played it smart and won the fight. I think people need to think about what they really want. It's funny because a lot of the people who are pissed about Guida tonight are the same people who cheer for Georges St-Pierre.
|
|
Sonnen
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 16, 2010 8:42:36 GMT -5
Posts: 3,261
|
Post by Sonnen on Jun 5, 2011 12:48:43 GMT -5
So, if Guida is a joke, then what does that make the guy that just lost to him?? Yea that's what thought when it happened, the amount of hate on Sherdog for the guy, pathetic. One matrix kick does not make you a champion, I heard someone say and I couldn't agree more. Guida was set up to fall as far as I can see it, Dana wanted to showcase this guy and ed up. Good, I'm a Guida fan and I'm glad he score the won.
|
|
DWright
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 7, 2005 18:30:58 GMT -5
Posts: 3,839
|
Post by DWright on Jun 5, 2011 14:03:00 GMT -5
So, if Guida is a joke, then what does that make the guy that just lost to him?? Yea that's what thought when it happened, the amount of hate on Sherdog for the guy, pathetic. One matrix kick does not make you a champion, I heard someone say and I couldn't agree more. Guida was set up to fall as far as I can see it, Dana wanted to showcase this guy and ed up. Good, I'm a Guida fan and I'm glad he score the won. So you're glad that fights like these give others ideas to game-plan and be content to just blanket a fighter for three rounds while earning "shoulder strikes" (which is the most ridiculous thing ever) and rarely working to improve position? Good job. Outside of Guida "controlling the fight," I honestly don't feel he won this at all. Pettis was NEVER in trouble. Pettis was never "controlled" as he worked off his back a LOT more than Guida worked from guard or pushed up against the fence...and on the feet, even Pettis was more effective. I'm sorry, but sitting in someones guard for 3 rounds, while not being able to even remotely put your opponent in danger is not a victory. Guida didn't win, he just made sure he didn't lose. I can't stand when someone with Guida's conditioning does stuff like this.
|
|
Sonnen
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 16, 2010 8:42:36 GMT -5
Posts: 3,261
|
Post by Sonnen on Jun 5, 2011 14:22:27 GMT -5
Yea that's what thought when it happened, the amount of hate on Sherdog for the guy, pathetic. One matrix kick does not make you a champion, I heard someone say and I couldn't agree more. Guida was set up to fall as far as I can see it, Dana wanted to showcase this guy and ed up. Good, I'm a Guida fan and I'm glad he score the won. So you're glad that fights like these give others ideas to game-plan and be content to just blanket a fighter for three rounds while earning "shoulder strikes" (which is the most ridiculous thing ever) and rarely working to improve position? Good job. Outside of Guida "controlling the fight," I honestly don't feel he won this at all. Pettis was NEVER in trouble. Pettis was never "controlled" as he worked off his back a LOT more than Guida worked from guard or pushed up against the fence...and on the feet, even Pettis was more effective. I'm sorry, but sitting in someones guard for 3 rounds, while not being able to even remotely put your opponent in danger is not a victory. Guida didn't win, he just made sure he didn't lose. I can't stand when someone with Guida's conditioning does stuff like this. Well Pettis was attacking off his back constantly, also very good at attempting submissions and gaining wrist control. It's not always easy to work to improve you position against someone who was doing a very good job off his back. People can hate on Guida all they like for not liking his performance, but at the end of the day his game plan got him the win. And quite honestly people who cheer and like GSP need to take a serious look at themselves if they attack Guida for his performance.
|
|
DWright
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 7, 2005 18:30:58 GMT -5
Posts: 3,839
|
Post by DWright on Jun 5, 2011 14:36:29 GMT -5
So you're glad that fights like these give others ideas to game-plan and be content to just blanket a fighter for three rounds while earning "shoulder strikes" (which is the most ridiculous thing ever) and rarely working to improve position? Good job. Outside of Guida "controlling the fight," I honestly don't feel he won this at all. Pettis was NEVER in trouble. Pettis was never "controlled" as he worked off his back a LOT more than Guida worked from guard or pushed up against the fence...and on the feet, even Pettis was more effective. I'm sorry, but sitting in someones guard for 3 rounds, while not being able to even remotely put your opponent in danger is not a victory. Guida didn't win, he just made sure he didn't lose. I can't stand when someone with Guida's conditioning does stuff like this. That's an awful excuse. The majority of the fight, Guida was head to chest/chest to chest, so there was no spacing to get caught. He was content with throwing "shoulder strikes" and letting the time tick off the clock. Guida would very rarely attempt to move into half guard, and even that was basically acting to show the ref he was "working." Sorry, but...what? Outside of the Thiago Alves fight (which yes, was quite boring), GSP is just finding himself struggling to finish a fight. GSP at least TRIES to finish fights. He causes a lot of damage to his opponents. The Alves fight, he apparently got hurt and played it safe. Was it boring? Yes. Was it smart? Yes. The Shields fight was a standup battle where St. Pierre could hardly see after the first round. It still wasn't two fighters laying on the ground for 3+ minutes basically in the same position. You can't compare Guida causing absolutely no damage during a fight (nor even really trying) to GSP dominating his opponents. Do I think GSP could finish more of these fights? (IE - Koscheck) Sure, and I wish he did. I think he could have taken a basically blind Kos down and finished him, but at least he was the aggressive fighter and showed he wanted to actually be active to win the fight. GSP does that every fight. Guida is one of the many fighters lately who game plan to drag out a fight. That's a HUGE difference between the two.
|
|
|
Post by HHH316 on Jun 5, 2011 14:46:09 GMT -5
All of this guida hate is ridiculous. He's finished his last three fights in impressive fashion. If people are going to break his balls about it, there's a laundry list full of guys that should be crucified before him. It's like people expected to see a swanton bomb hammerfist off of the cage. Relax people, not every fight is going to end with something to put in a highlight reel. Don't write the guy off because he used his wrestling skills to get a win. If you are pissed, yell at pettis for not bucking him off. Yea, sounds ridiculous right?
|
|
Sonnen
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 16, 2010 8:42:36 GMT -5
Posts: 3,261
|
Post by Sonnen on Jun 5, 2011 14:57:28 GMT -5
I'm a GSP fan, infact he is my favorite, but I've gotten to the point with GSP where I don't believe he's fighting to finish, I believe he is fighting to win and get the decision, I also don't have a problem with that. He doesn't like putting himself in danger and when he gets in to danger, he seems panicked. I think he had reason to in the Jake Shields fight, but when they went to that corner, you could see it in the mans face that he shook up. He plays it's safe, he fights to score and win, and it works. He causes damage, but that's it he never goes for the finish, and anyone who says GSP throwing that stupid repetitive punch that missed Shields every time trying to finish can piss off.
Clay Guida in this fight took it to the ground and I saw him keeping busy, it's not the old same Clay Guida that I was use to seeing in earlier UFC, and I think that's what's pissed of most fans. But I think Clay Guida was right to be cautious with his ground wrok, Pettis showed to be very dangerous off his back when Guida attempted anything and when Guida did improve position it was because it was the right time to do so. I'm not going to agree with you here, from what I saw I was fine with Guida's performance. Oh, and unlike GSP, he has actually finished fights.
Whilst the rules are the way they are. You're going to get these types of fights, some are boring, but this I didn't mind. I think the Guida hate is ridiculous. And unfair.
|
|
PdW2kX
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 8, 2007 23:34:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,551
|
Post by PdW2kX on Jun 5, 2011 15:00:24 GMT -5
I think the Guida fans are a little confused as to why there's so much hate for him going on now. Personally, I'm not mad that Guida shot for the takedown constantly and kept the fight mostly on the ground. I'm mad that he did all else once the fight got there. As I said before, Guida embodied all the worst qualities Greg Jackson cynics accuse of Greg Jackson fighters: he used his wrestling to hold position and then drained out the clock, doing nothing but minimal damage and just barely enough to not get stood up. For this one fight, Guida became the kind of fighter who would rather win than make it entertaining, who's so focused on keeping his spot that he doesn't care if the fight is boring. That's never been who Clay Guida was, that was never what he was all about. So, when you think about it, a lot of Guida fans are feeling betrayed right now. As I said, I don't care that Guida won by takedowns. I care that he didn't do anything with them afterwards. And I hate to bring up this argument, but think of the way the fight would have been scored in Japan. Guida would have been carded for stalling, and Pettis more than likely would have won because he spent so much time attempting to finish the fight with submissions. Guida used his dominant wrestling and the Unified Rules system to grind out the decision in a very boring fight. Since when does Clay Guida have boring fights? That's why I'm mad at him, that's why I think most people are mad at him. This is the UFC, one bad performance CAN and WILL cause your other good performances to not matter. Even though he's won four straight, even though he's been finishing guys, there's no way that Guida deserves a title shot after that performance. Even Dana White agrees with me, he's not giving Guida the shot. So I say " it", Clay Guida is going to have to go back to being Clay Guida if he wants me to take him seriously in his next fight. And with Pettis no longer getting the title shot that was promised to him (which is total ing , by the way), I'm putting my feet firmly in the Jim Miller war wagon and hoping he gets the next shot.
|
|
Sonnen
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 16, 2010 8:42:36 GMT -5
Posts: 3,261
|
Post by Sonnen on Jun 5, 2011 15:13:39 GMT -5
"PdW2kX" Right I can't really argue with you dude, your reasoning as to why your angry whilst might not be agreeable to some, is understandable. But regarding Clay Guida and title shot, I think if he's not going to be made the number one contender, he should if he gain a win in his next fight.
As far as Pettis goes? This is the UFC, this isn't the WEC, and if he's going to be given a title shot as soon as he walks in to the UFC, he needs to score a win first, hence why Dana set Clay up to loose in my opinion. This didn't go to plan, so rightfully so, he needs to prove to the UFC audience that he belongs there. You don't give a title shot to a guy fresh of a loss in his debut the company at the end of the day.
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Jun 5, 2011 15:30:22 GMT -5
GSP WORKS on the ground. He passes guard, he works for submissions when he can and he does damage. Guida did NONE of that. In round 2, he literally had his head on Pettis' chest for almost 3 minutes straight. Didn't work to pass guard, didn't work for strikes or submissions. He was on the DEFENSE the entire fight, while Pettis was working for the finish with strikes and submissions.
|
|